cs.ROSep 20, 2026

Cognitive Action Reasoning for Proactive Robots from Human-Centered Multimodal Observations

Authors: Zhihao GuKechao ZhuYuanfeng WuMohan LiuAnkit Kumar ShawChenDong HongXuanyu ChenDengchen Mei+2 more

Abstract

Robots operating in human-centered environments are typically designed to execute explicit instructions, and most robot-learning datasets likewise pair observations with task instructions or low-level actions. Although recent work has begun to explore proactive embodied assistance, existing resources target different settings and action levels, leaving real-world human-centered multimodal decision-making underexplored. We formulate this problem as \textit{Proactive Robot Action Reasoning} (\textit{ProRobo}), an upstream cognitive decision problem in which a robot must determine which action to take based on multimodal human and environmental cues without explicit action instructions. To support ProRobo, we introduce \textit{ProAction}, a real-world multimodal dataset containing 10K samples of visual observations, audio signals, and text inputs across 12 daily-life scenarios in five common scenes. To construct cognitively grounded high-level action supervision, we develop a two-stage human-in-the-loop pipeline that combines appraisal-guided candidate generation with Affective Theory-of-Mind-guided human refinement, explicitly incorporating contextual judgment about human states, urgency, feasibility, and potential risk into action annotation. Based on this supervision, we benchmark representative Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) and introduce \textit{MMC2Act}, a reference model that implicitly learns the mapping from multimodal observations to cognitively grounded high-level actions. Experiments across modality settings, subject-disjoint generalization, cross-dataset transfer, and human evaluation show that general-purpose MLLMs struggle with proactively reasoning high-level actions from multimodal cues, whereas training on \textit{ProAction} substantially improves performance.

Explore similar work

Oct 20, 2025cs.RO

Robobench: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models as Embodied Brain

Building robots that can perceive, reason, and act in dynamic, unstructured environments remains a central challenge. Recent embodied systems often follow a dual-system paradigm, where System 2 performs high-level reasoning and System 1 handles low-level control. We refer to System 2 as the embodied brain, the cognitive core for decision-making in manipulation. Although evaluating this embodied brain is crucial, existing benchmarks mainly measure execution success or cover only limited aspects of high-level cognition and task realism. We introduce RoboBench, a benchmark for evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) as embodied brains. RoboBench covers five dimensions: Instruction Comprehension, Perception Reasoning, Generalized Planning, Affordance Prediction, and Failure Analysis. It spans 14 capabilities, 25 tasks, and 6,092 QA pairs. To improve realism, it draws from large-scale real robotic data and in-house collection across diverse embodiments, attribute-rich objects, multi-view scenes, and memory-driven navigation. For planning, RoboBench introduces an MLLM-as-world-simulator framework that assesses whether predicted plans can achieve critical object-state changes under physical and visual constraints, enabling more faithful evaluation of long-horizon reasoning than symbolic matching. Experiments on 18 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal persistent limitations in implicit instruction understanding, spatiotemporal reasoning, cross-scenario planning, fine-grained affordance understanding, and failure diagnosis. We further analyze how embodied cognitive abilities relate to downstream robotic control. RoboBench offers a comprehensive scaffold for quantifying high-level cognition and guiding next-generation MLLMs toward more robust robotic intelligence.
Yulin Luo, Chun-Kai Fan, Menghang Dong +19
Feb 3, 2026cs.RO

ProAct: A Benchmark and Multimodal Framework for Structure-Aware Proactive Response

While passive agents merely follow instructions, proactive agents align with higher-level objectives, such as assistance and safety by continuously monitoring the environment to determine when and how to act. However, developing proactive agents is hindered by the lack of specialized resources. To address this, we introduce ProAct-75, a benchmark designed to train and evaluate proactive agents across diverse domains, including assistance, maintenance, and safety monitoring. Spanning 75 tasks, our dataset features 91,581 step-level annotations enriched with explicit task graphs. These graphs encode step dependencies and parallel execution possibilities, providing the structural grounding necessary for complex decision-making. Building on this benchmark, we propose ProAct-Helper, a reference baseline powered by a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) that grounds decision-making in state detection, and leveraging task graphs to enable entropy-driven heuristic search for action selection, allowing agents to execute parallel threads independently rather than mirroring the human's next step. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ProAct-Helper outperforms strong closed-source models, improving trigger detection mF1 by 6.21%, saving 0.25 more steps in online one-step decision, and increasing the rate of parallel actions by 15.58%.
Xiaomeng Zhu, Fengming Zhu, Weijie Zhou +8
Mar 19, 2026cs.CV

ProactiveBench: Benchmarking Proactiveness in Multimodal Large Language Models

Effective collaboration begins with knowing when to ask for help. For example, when trying to identify an occluded object, a human would ask someone to remove the obstruction. Can MLLMs exhibit a similar "proactive" behavior by requesting simple user interventions? To investigate this, we introduce ProactiveBench, a benchmark built from seven repurposed datasets that tests proactiveness across different tasks such as recognizing occluded objects, enhancing image quality, and interpreting coarse sketches. We evaluate 22 MLLMs on ProactiveBench, showing that (i) they generally lack proactiveness; (ii) proactiveness does not correlate with model capacity; (iii) "hinting" at proactiveness yields only marginal gains. Surprisingly, we found that conversation histories and in-context learning introduce negative biases, hindering performance. Finally, we explore a simple fine-tuning strategy based on reinforcement learning: its results suggest that proactiveness can be learned, even generalizing to unseen scenarios. We publicly release ProactiveBench as a first step toward building proactive multimodal models.
Thomas De Min, Subhankar Roy, Stéphane Lathuilière +2