cs.LGSep 22, 2026

SambaGraph: Action-Reaction Spatio-Temporal Graphs for Soccer Tactical Response Modeling

Authors: Abel A. Reyes-AnguloHenry O. VelesacaSteven Araujo

Abstract

Soccer tactics are interactive: an attacking action changes the opponent's defensive problem, and the observed response depends on the multi-agent match state. We introduce SambaGraph, an action--reaction spatio-temporal graph dataset and benchmark for soccer tactical response modeling. From tracking and event data for all 64 matches of the 2022 FIFA World Cup, we curate 4,070 action-centered episodes represented as temporally aligned 23-node player--ball graph sequences with attack/defense views, response labels, and 26,270 split-safe attack--defense pairs. We study three questions: whether observed responses can be classified from graph episodes, whether successful defenses can be retrieved for a query attack, and whether graph-derived summaries support grounded LLM reasoning. A compact signature MLP obtains 0.796±0.0070.796\pm0.007 macro-F1 for response classification, while a fused graph--signature dual encoder reaches 0.471±0.0290.471\pm0.029 Hit@5 and 0.655±0.0510.655\pm0.051 Hit@10 for full-bank defensive retrieval. Hard negatives maximize pair discrimination but not retrieval quality. Local LLMs underperform supervised encoders for direct classification and do not improve over a strong original order in eight-candidate reranking, but they provide grounded tactical rationales. These results position SambaGraph as a reproducible benchmark for graph-based soccer strategy-response research. Code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/areyesan/SambaGraph.

Explore similar work

Jun 8, 2026cs.CV

SoccerNet 2026 Player-Centric Ball-Action Spotting:Retraining and Post-Processing Extensions to the FOOTPASS Baselines

We describe our system for the SoccerNet 2026 Player-Centric Ball-Action Spotting Challenge, which requires predicting who performs which action and when, across eight classes in broadcast soccer. Building on the three FOOTPASS baselines [1] (TAAD, TAAD+GNN, and TAAD+DST), we contribute four extensions: (1) gradient check pointing to enable full-backbone fine-tuning on a single GPU; (2) fusion of GNN logits into the DST encoder, combining graph-based tactical context with per-player visual features; (3) square-root frequency class weighting to address the 213:1 pass-to-tackle imbalance in the training data; and (4) a post processing pipeline comprising per-class logit gating, temporal frame refinement, jersey re-assignment, and a two-model ensemble. Our system achieves 0.548 Macro F1 on the test set and 0.446 on the challenge set (server evaluation).
Parthsarthi Rawat
Jul 16, 2026cs.AI

SportD: How do VLMs physically strategize?

Vision-language models (VLMs) can describe a scene, but can they act well within one? We study whether VLMs can make sound strategic decisions, using soccer as an objective testbed with quantifiably-valued actions. We introduce SportD, a dataset and evaluation consisting of 1421 decision scenarios across professional men's and women's soccer games, where a VLM must decide what action to take next. Models on average select the optimal action around 27% of the time, less often than the professional players, and capture markedly less of the value at stake. Furthermore, they exhibit a clear preference for safer actions, favoring lower-variance, lower-value choices that also make less physical progress toward goal. Frontier VLMs are better at estimating whether an action will succeed, placing the highest-success-probability action among their top choices in 72-85% of cases. Yet VLMs systematically conflate likelihood with value, assigning higher value to actions that are more likely to succeed (ρ=+0.30ρ=+0.30 to +0.52+0.52), despite no such relationship in the ground truth (ρ=0.08ρ=-0.08). Modifying the deliberation instructions to encourage risk-taking brings the frontier models closer to the players' skill levels. SportD opens a new direction for rigorously evaluating physical strategic decision-making in VLMs, showing that careful decomposition of their choices can reveal the mechanisms underlying systematic biases such as risk aversion.
Jasin Cekinmez, Addison J. Wu, Haotian Xia +6
Jun 23, 2026cs.CV

SoccerNet 2026 Player-Centric Ball Action Spotting: Per-Player Attention with Agreement-Based Ensembling

We present our submission to the SoccerNet 2026 Player-Centric Ball Action Spotting challenge, which uses a two-stage pipeline: a Track-Aware Action Detector (TAAD) produces per-player action logits from broadcast video, and a Denoising Sequence Transduction (DST) transformer converts game-state features and TAAD logits into structured event sequences. We improve the TAAD with a temporal transformer that adds cross-frame context, alongside several training fixes. For the DST stage, we introduce a two-stage per-player attention mechanism operating on game-state features, and show that a spatial-first attention ordering (cross-player attention before temporal attention) improves validation Macro-F1 by 1.87%. To exploit architectural diversity, we train four model variants and combine them with a Weighted Event Fusion ensemble that applies agreement filtering to suppress single-model false positives while preserving recall, plus a dedicated exception for the rare tackle class. Our final system improves the challenge Macro-F1 from a baseline of 48.6 to 58.94.
Faisal Altawijri, Ismail Mathkour