cs.LGSep 23, 2026

A Systematic Benchmark of Explainable Methods for Temporal Attribution in Sequential Recommendation Systems

Authors: Akash Pandey, Kanisha Shah, Addrish Roy, Dwipam Katariya, Hongyangyang Shi, Amanda Ding, Kalanand Mishra, Pranab Mohanty

Read PDF
Ask AI
Cite

Copy citation

DOINot available for this paper

Abstract

Sequential RecSys are central to modern personalization, exploiting user's historical interaction sequences to drive next-step decisions. Deep learning models, particularly CNN and Transformer-based architectures, have proven highly effective at capturing temporal dependencies in these histories. For transparency and trust, understanding which past interactions drive a given recommendation is increasingly important --- both for developers auditing model behavior and for users seeking a rationale. However, the non-linearities that give these models their predictive power also render them black boxes, making it difficult to attribute decisions to specific interactions. While gradient-based, perturbation-based, and attention-based explainability methods exist, a systematic benchmark of their faithfulness for sequential recommendation is missing. We address this gap by introducing a dual-model masking metric in which one model supplies per-timestep attribution scores and a separately trained, masking-robust probe measures the resulting change in predicted probability. Using this metric, we benchmark ten XAI methods across CNN, Transformer, SASRec, and BERT4Rec backbones on KuaiRand and MovieLens, complemented by analyses of temporal attribution patterns, item popularity confounding, and robustness to input corruption. Our key findings are: (1) gradient-based methods, particularly GradientSHAP and Integrated Gradients, yield the most faithful and robust attributions; (2) raw attention weights are unreliable, but gradient-weighted attention restores faithfulness on shorter sequences, with degradation on longer horizons as softmax attention probabilities converge toward uniform importance scores, diminishing the method's ability to identify informative interactions; and (3) temporal attribution patterns in faithful methods reflect genuine task structure rather than recency or popularity bias.

Explore similar work

CardsList
May 6, 2026cs.IR

Rethinking Convolutional Networks for Attribute-Aware Sequential Recommendation

Attribute-aware sequential recommendation entails predicting the next item a user will interact with based on a chronologically ordered history of past interactions, enriched with item attributes. Existing methods typically leverage self-attention mechanisms to aggregate the entire sequence into a unified representation used for next-item prediction. While effective, these models often suffer from high computational complexity and memory consumption, limiting their ability to process long user histories. This constraint restricts the model's capacity to fully capture long-term user preferences. In some scenarios, modeling item interactions purely through attention may also not be the most effective approach to extract sequential patterns. In this work, we propose ConvRec, an alternative method with linear computational and memory complexity that employs convolutional layers in a hierarchical, down-scaled fashion to generate compact, yet expressive sequence representations. To further enhance the model's ability to capture diverse sequential patterns, each layer aggregates the neighboring items gradually to reach a comprehensive sequence representation. Extensive experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art sequential recommendation models, highlighting the potential of convolution-based architectures for efficient and effective sequence modeling in recommendation systems. Our implementation code and datasets are available here https://github.com/ismll-research/ConvRec.
Shereen Elsayed, Ngoc Son Le, Ahmed Rashed +1
Multimodal RecommendationSequence ModelingConvolutional Neural NetworksRecommendation
AskPDF
Apr 21, 2026cs.IR

From Top-1 to Top-K: A Reproducibility Study and Benchmarking of Counterfactual Explanations for Recommender Systems

Counterfactual explanations (CEs) provide an intuitive way to understand recommender systems by identifying minimal modifications to user-item interactions that alter recommendation outcomes. Existing CE methods for recommender systems, however, have been evaluated under heterogeneous protocols, using different datasets, recommenders, metrics, and even explanation formats, which hampers reproducibility and fair comparison. Our paper systematically reproduces, re-implement, and re-evaluate eleven state-of-the-art CE methods for recommender systems, covering both native explainers (e.g., LIME-RS, SHAP, PRINCE, ACCENT, LXR, GREASE) and specific graph-based explainers originally proposed for GNNs. Here, a unified benchmarking framework is proposed to assess explainers along three dimensions: explanation format (implicit vs. explicit), evaluation level (item-level vs. list-level), and perturbation scope (user interaction vectors vs. user-item interaction graphs). Our evaluation protocol includes effectiveness, sparsity, and computational complexity metrics, and extends existing item-level assessments to top-K list-level explanations. Through extensive experiments on three real-world datasets and six representative recommender models, we analyze how well previously reported strengths of CE methods generalize across diverse setups. We observe that the trade-off between effectiveness and sparsity depends strongly on the specific method and evaluation setting, particularly under the explicit format; in addition, explainer performance remains largely consistent across item level and list level evaluations, and several graph-based explainers exhibit notable scalability limitations on large recommender graphs. Our results refine and challenge earlier conclusions about the robustness and practicality of CE generation methods in recommender systems: https://github.com/L2R-UET/CFExpRec.
Quang-Huy Nguyen, Thanh-Hai Nguyen, Khac-Manh Thai +6
Recommender SystemsCounterfactual ExplanationRecommendationMultimodal RecommendationReproducibilityTop-K
AskPDF
Jul 12, 2026cs.IR

RecRec: Recursive Refinement for Sequential Recommendation

Sequential recommender systems typically infer user preferences through single-pass encoding of interaction histories without iterative refinement, relying on increasingly deep architectures to capture complex patterns. In this work, we revisit sequential recommendation from a recursive inference perspective: can user preferences be modeled as a persistent latent state that is recursively refined? We propose RecRec (Recursive Recommendation), a lightweight model that maintains a compact latent state and updates it through a shared recursive module conditioned on interaction evidence. Unlike prior recursive models, RecRec introduces an evidence-anchored correction mechanism that stabilizes refinement by grounding each update in the original interaction context, preventing semantic drift during deep recursive reasoning. Experiments on three benchmark datasets under standard evaluation protocols show that RecRec matches or outperforms state-of-the-art sequential, graph-based, and reasoning-enhanced recommenders while using only 3.9M to 14M parameters. Ablation studies demonstrate that both recursive refinement and the evidence-anchored correction gate contribute significantly to performance, highlighting the effectiveness of recursive latent inference as a scalable alternative to deeper or language-based architectures. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/RecRec-6B67/README.md.
Pervez Shaik, Prosenjit Biswas, Abhinav Thorat +2
Sequential RecommendationRecommendationRefinementIterative Self-Correction
AskPDF