Hidden not Deleted: How Networks Suppress Entangled Features

Source-free class unlearning erases whole classes using only the forget data, judged at the representation level, where features can leak a class the head no longer predicts. Existing feature-space erasers answer with one fixed projection, yet forget and retain classes share a representation, so deleting one disturbs the other where they overlap. We prove this tension is a frontier. Every fixed projection that deletes pays a retain cost of at least the retain-readout energy along the forget-discriminant subspace, and erasing that subspace alone attains the floor. The leading source-free erasers all instantiate the form it binds, so the frontier limits the whole class. Conditioning the erasure on the input escapes it. Spectral Conditional Projective Erasure (SCOPE) does so with a single gate, suppressing the forget subspace chiefly on inputs its frozen head's weight scores read as a forget class. It is closed form, needs no retain data or gradient training, and costs orders of magnitude less than retraining. Across five object, face, and speaker benchmarks spanning two modalities and both convolutional and transformer backbones, the frontier predicts the measured retain cost. SCOPE leads the source-free erasers on every benchmark and forget-set size, and at the hardest setting it tops every unlearner, trained methods included.

Neural networks can leverage feature superposition to encode more concepts than dimensions, but cross-feature interference constrains the linear accessibility of simultaneously active features. By framing linear accessibility as a compressed sensing problem, we derive high-probability bounds for fixed supports under subgaussian noise, proving the sufficient dimension scales linearly ($d=O_{\varepsilon}(k \log m)$) rather than prior worst-case quadratic limits. We then validate these bounds across system parameters through Gaussian-tail approximations. These results quantify the geometric constraints of the linear representation hypothesis, providing a framework for evaluating sparse autoencoders, compositional generalization, and neural interpretability.

Concept erasure aims to remove a target concept from a representation while preserving the other information encoded in it. This is difficult because representations encode many concepts that are often correlated with the erasure target, so removing the target risks damaging them. We propose the Manifold Constraint Hypothesis (MCH): if natural representations concentrate on a structured, lower-dimensional manifold, then interventions should be constrained to that manifold and better preserve other information encoded in the representation during interventions. We instantiate MCH in a new concept erasure method: MANifold aware Concept Erasure (MANCE). MANCE performs iterative updates to the representations using signals from a classifier that predicts a target concept. We estimate the manifold using representations obtained from natural inputs, and then we project the concept removal update to the estimated manifold. We perform extensive evaluation on 119 settings spanning text and vision, including 13 language models, three NLP concepts, and 40 CelebA-CLIP attributes. Employing MANCE on top of previous methods shows consistent improved leakage results. We also introduce MANCE+ and MANCE++, which prepend a closed-form erasure algorithm before employing MANCE, achieving better leakage--surgicality tradeoffs relative to matched full-space updates. MANCE++, our best method, achieves state-of-the-art results on nonlinear concept erasure. These results support MCH in the erasure setting: interventions should be constrained to the natural representation manifold.