Online platforms have become arenas for the public contestation of climate change, shaping how scientific knowledge, denial, and uncertainty are expressed and disputed. Yet longitudinal evidence remains limited for YouTube, especially for Portuguese-language discourse. Addressing this gap, we characterize how climate stances are expressed and contested over time in a large corpus of Portuguese-language YouTube comments retrieved through Brazil-oriented climate-related searches. To support this analysis in a noisy, imbalanced, and low-resource setting, we collect more than 240,000 comments posted between 2014 and 2024 and formulate stance detection as a three-way classification task (Believer, Denier, and Inconclusive). We operationalize stance attribution through a scalable self-training pipeline based on Llama 3.1, using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and hybrid instance selection to expand the training set with high-confidence pseudo-labeled examples while preserving class diversity. This approach improves coverage and class balance for minority and rhetorically complex classes, enabling large-scale stance attribution without extensive manual annotation. Our results show that polarisation is marked by interactional asymmetries: denialist comments are less prevalent, but they are associated with a comparatively higher share of cross-stance contestation, while pro-consensus discourse is more strongly reinforced within stance-homogeneous threads.
Climate discourse online shapes public understanding of climate change and informs political and policy debate, yet it unfolds across structurally different environments: paid advertising platforms host targeted, institutionally produced messaging, while public social media reflects largely organic, user-driven discussion. We present a comparative analysis of climate discourse across paid advertisements on Meta (previously Facebook) and public posts on Bluesky from July 2024 to September 2025. To support it, we develop an interpretable thematic discovery pipeline that clusters texts by semantic similarity and uses large language models (LLMs) to label clusters with concise, human-interpretable themes, requiring no predefined topic inventory or seed set. Using these themes, we find the two environments diverge systematically: paid advertising centers on strategic promotion of specific solutions in a formal, forward-looking register, whereas organic discourse centers on systemic critique in a crisis-oriented, scientifically grounded one. We also evaluate the utility of the discovered themes through downstream stance prediction and theme-guided retrieval tasks. While our analysis focuses on climate communication, the framework generalizes to comparative thematic analysis across heterogeneous communication environments.
Samantha Sudhoff, Pranav Perumal, Zhaoqing Wu +1
Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
We present SemEval-2026 Task 9, a shared task on online polarization detection, covering 22 languages and comprising over 110K annotated instances. Each data instance is multi-labeled with the presence of polarization, polarization type, and polarization manifestation. Participants were asked to predict labels in three sub-tasks: (1) detecting the presence of polarization, (2) identifying the type of polarization, and (3) recognizing the polarization manifestation. The three tasks attracted over 1,000 participants worldwide and more than 10k submission on Codabench. We received final submissions from 67 teams and 73 system description papers. We report the baseline results and analyze the performance of the best-performing systems, highlighting the most common approaches and the most effective methods across different subtasks and languages. The dataset of this task is publicly available.
Usman Naseem, Robert Geislinger, Juan Ren +31
Macquarie University · University of Hamburg · Zayed University +23
Social media archives are often used to study resistance to climate action, but words, response counters and observed participants do not measure the same social process. We examine four supplied Twitter and Reddit archives by processing all registered files without sampling and applying transparent, non-exclusive lexical rules. The study links frame co-occurrence to source-specific temporal and response models, then separates event-period changes among returning authors from participant turnover. Renewable-energy terms accompany cost-related language on Reddit, yet narrower backlash phrases sharply reduce cross-source contrasts and reverse the sign of the Paris Agreement contrast in submissions. Cross-discourse history does not improve eligible primary-context forecasts. Denial/hoax terms are associated with higher recorded Twitter likes, whereas Reddit response associations depend on frame, outcome and author specification. Around the 2019 global climate strike, returning-author expression and participant turnover both contribute to increased protest-language shares. An archive endpoint prevents the corresponding Climate Twitter migration inference. Most crossed-cluster estimates lack released intervals, and joint author/month response covariance estimates fail, restricting formal inference. These results show how operational definitions, platform-specific response fields and observation boundaries shape what can be claimed about climate backlash. The contribution is an archive-based account of these measurement consequences, rather than a measure of individual opposition, persuasion or advocacy-induced backlash.