BaseCamp --- An Agentic AI Framework for Automating DNA Sequencing Data Pipelines
Organizations: Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA · Florida International University, USA · AI Motion Labs, Melbourne, Australia · Center for Wireless Communications, University of Oulu, Finland · Deloitte & Touche LLP, USA · Nanyang Technological University, Singapore · University of Colombo, Sri Lanka · Accenture Technology Labs, Arlington, VA, USA · GSI Scandinavia AB · Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Abstract
DNA sequencing pipelines, spanning quality control, alignment, variant calling, and annotation, are now reliably executed by workflow management systems that orchestrate established bioinformatics tools at scale. What remains manual is the decision layer surrounding that execution: selecting quality thresholds appropriate to a sample and platform, adjudicating borderline variant calls, diagnosing anomalies, and determining which findings warrant expert review. These decisions are repetitive, judgment-intensive, inconsistent across operators, and frequently undocumented. This paper introduces BaseCamp, a novel agentic AI framework for automating the decision layer of DNA sequencing pipelines. The framework decomposes the pipeline into six specialized AI agents, covering sample intake and quality control, alignment, variant calling, annotation, cross-stage monitoring, and reporting. Critically, BaseCamp agents do not perform sequence analysis: established tools execute alignment, calling, and annotation, while the agents select among them, configure them, interpret their output, and decide what follows. This confines language model reasoning to the judgment layer where it is reliable and preserves the reproducibility existing tooling guarantees. Agent reasoning is powered by a consortium of fine-tuned, domain-specialized large language models coordinated by a central reasoning LLM, executing locally so no sequencing data leaves the operating environment, under human-in-the-loop orchestration. Evaluation shows agent-generated configurations are concordant with expert practice, that an explicit filtering ledger renders inspectable what filtering otherwise removes without trace, and that cross-stage anomaly detection surfaces conditions execution monitoring misses. BaseCamp offers a generalizable blueprint for agentic automation of scientific data pipelines.
Figures & tables
| Metric | Value |
| Caller selection agreement with expert | 96.2% |
| Filtering threshold agreement (within tolerance) | 88.4% |
| Call set concordance with expert configuration | 99.1% |
| Ledger completeness (filters recorded / applied) | 100% |
| Marginal calls surfaced vs. expert-identified | 91.7% |
| Decisions escalated as insufficient context | 4.3% |
| Anomaly class | Recall | Precision | Correct diagnosis ranked first |
| Coverage shortfall | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.94 |
| Contamination / index hopping | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.77 |
| Aberrant call rate | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.83 |
| Batch effect | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| Cross-stage inconsistency | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.76 |
| Overall | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.80 |