BRFID: Toward Byzantine-Robust Federated Intrusion Detection

Federated learning enables privacy-conscious collaboration for network intrusion detection without centralizing sensitive traffic data, yet its deployment in operational environments must simultaneously satisfy three competing requirements: formal differential privacy guaranties, tolerance to Byzantine-adversarial participants, and reliable detection coverage across severely imbalanced attack categories. Existing literature treats these properties as independently composable, an assumption that this paper challenges both theoretically and empirically. In this paper, we study how these requirements interact in class-imbalanced federated NIDS and introduce geometric indistinguishability as a conceptual lens for a regime in which privacy-induced dispersion in client updates can make minority-class signals harder for robust aggregation to preserve. Using UNSW-NB15 as a case study, we evaluate DP-SGD combined with coordinate-wise median under label-flip and model-poisoning attacks, with threat coverage assessed across attack categories. Our results provide initial evidence that the joint use of privacy noise and robust aggregation can disproportionately degrade detection of rare attacks relative to majority classes. We also show that part of the observed collapse under strong privacy can arise from training miscalibration, while a residual performance floor may remain for ultra-rare categories even after epsilon-dependent tuning. These findings motivate studying privacy, robustness, and rare-attack coverage jointly rather than as independently composable properties, and suggest that aggregation-aware modeling and sample-aware evaluation are promising directions for trustworthy federated NIDS.

Most existing Byzantine-robust federated learning (FL) methods suffer from slow and unstable convergence. Moreover, when handling a substantial proportion of colluded malicious clients, achieving robustness typically entails compromising model utility. To address these issues, this work introduces FedIDM, which employs distribution matching to construct trustworthy condensed data for identifying and filtering abnormal clients. FedIDM consists of two main components: (1) attack-tolerant condensed data generation, and (2) robust aggregation with negative contribution-based rejection. These components exclude local updates that (1) deviate from the update direction derived from condensed data, or (2) cause a significant loss on the condensed dataset. Comprehensive evaluations on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that FedIDM achieves fast and stable convergence while maintaining acceptable model utility, under multiple state-of-the-art Byzantine attacks involving a large number of malicious clients.

Personalized Federated Learning (PFL) has emerged as a promising solution for intrusion detection in heterogeneous IoT environments, as it can improve local adaptation under highly Non-Independent and Identically Distributed (non-IID) data distributions. However, existing PFL methods often rely on client-side self-adjustment, which may lead to over-personalization and substantial degradation in out-of-distribution (OOD) attack detection. In this paper, we propose Federated Bandit Intrusion Detection (FBID), a novel adaptive PFL framework to address this limitation through server-side personalization control. In particular, FBID employs a contextual multi-armed bandit at the server to dynamically regulate each client's local training intensity according to its observed behavior and update quality. Moreover, FBID introduces a trust-based blending mechanism to derive client-specific interpolation coefficients between the global and local models, thereby preserving global attack-detection knowledge while still allowing beneficial local specialization. Through extensive experiments on the CICIoT2023 dataset under heterogeneous client distributions and OOD stress-test settings, we show that FBID improves individual client OOD Detection Rate (DR) by up to 7.66% and F1-Score (F1) by up to 5.08% (relative) over the strongest stable baseline, while also improving robustness to previously unseen attack classes.