To Trust or Not to Trust: Retrieval-Augmented Fact Checking in Speech

Spoken factual claims often occur within multi-turn conversations, where surrounding dialogue can provide context unavailable from the claim alone. Yet most fact-checking research evaluates isolated text, leaving conversational audio under-studied. We introduce MAD2, a synthetic Multi-turn Audio Dialogues benchmark for spoken claim verification with 1,000 two-speaker dialogues, 1,230 sentence-level check-worthy candidate annotations, and approximately 10 hours of audio. We also propose calibrated multimodal fusion of a context-aware audio encoder and a dialogue-aware text model. Adding dialogue context improves verification across settings, although the gains vary by scenario. Past-only context often approaches local offline performance, suggesting its usefulness when future context is unavailable. Fusion achieves its highest mean advantage over text with full-dialogue context, but does not consistently or significantly outperform text across settings. Under full-dialogue context, exploratory subgroup results show greater performance variation across dialogue scenarios for text and fusion, but across spread styles for audio.

While text-based hallucination detection is well studied, reference-free detection of factual alterations in speech remains underexplored, especially for low-resource languages. Our spoken benchmark comprises 12,013 English, Russian, and Kazakh news samples with three synthetic alteration types and three severity levels, pairing source articles with rewrites as text, synthesized audio, and ASR transcripts. We add 290 fact-checked misinformation items collected in Russian (225) and Kazakh (65), translated into the other language and rendered through the same TTS-ASR pipeline. We evaluate fine-tuned multilingual encoders and zero-shot multimodal decoders on text, transcripts, and audio. Detectors receive only target inputs without source articles or external evidence; the task evaluates reference-free classification rather than evidence-grounded verification. Encoder degradation from source text to transcripts generally tracks per-language ASR error on the binary task. Among decoders, only Gemma-3n exceeds the binary majority-class baseline in macro-F1, on transcripts only; the other four fall below their respective baselines. Comparisons between audio and transcripts are confounded by differences in evaluation coverage and class balance. Synthetic-trained detectors achieve 0.82--0.88 macro-F1 on real-world misinformation source text; Russian provenance analysis reveals veracity-related and model-dependent machine-style signals, a key confound in synthetic hallucination benchmarks.

Audio platforms have evolved beyond entertainment. They have become central to public discourse, from podcasts and radio to WhatsApp voice notes and live streams. With millions of shows and hundreds of millions of listeners, audio platforms are now a major channel for misinformation. Yet existing fact-checking pipelines are mostly designed for written claims, overlooking the unique properties of spoken media. We argue that audio misinformation is not merely textual content with transcripts: it is structurally different because it is both spoken - carrying persuasive force through prosody, pacing, and emotion - and conversational - unfolding across turns, speakers, and episodes. These dual properties introduce verification difficulties that traditional methods rarely face. This position paper synthesizes evidence across modalities and platforms, examines datasets and methods, and highlights why existing pipelines fail on audio. We argue that advancing fact-checking requires rethinking verification pipelines around the spoken and conversational realities of audio.