This paper proposes an architecture for equipping large language models (LLMs) with audio-understanding capabilities without fine-tuning their weights. The proposed symbiotic architecture employs an injector module that writes audio-conditioned vectors directly into the target LLM's short-term memory, i.e., the key-value (KV) cache, enabling the LLM to behave as an audio language model (ALM). The architectural advantages are twofold. First, it improves the scalability of ALMs: because the proposed method bypasses the LLM during audio injection, the injection cost is governed by the injector width rather than the backbone width, and can therefore scale more slowly than the cost of full-backbone prefilling. Second, since the training scheme does not update the LLM weights, the original capabilities of the LLM are preserved without the risk of degradation from fine-tuning. The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated on both audio-understanding tasks (automatic speech recognition, audio question answering, and acoustic scene classification) and text-only tasks. We confirm that, while activating fewer parameters during audio prefilling, our architecture outperforms the conventional method with a frozen LLM and approaches the performance of a fine-tuned ALM, all while preserving the backbone LLM's original text-only task performance by construction.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: The conventional “monolithic” architecture and the proposed “symbiotic” architecture, which can accommodate both a large decoder and a fast, small injector.
Figure 2: Block diagrams of (a) the injector model, (b) the CNN block, and (c) the adapter block.
#Params
LibriSpeech
Clotho-AQA
CochlScene
Architecture
Total
Audio
Text
dev-clean
dev-other
test-clean
test-other
Encoder-only
1108M
1108M
752M
2.22
4.07
2.33
4.25
62.6
52.9
Symbiotic
1303M
551M
752M
1.91
3.73
2.07
3.91
47.1
41.7
Monolithic
1108M
1108M
752M
2.16
3.68
2.26
4.01
45.4
32.7
Table 1: Error rates (%) on audio and speech tasks. “Audio” and “Text” denote the number of parameters involved during audio prefilling and text prefilling, respectively.
Dataset
#hrs
Mix weight
Task
LibriSpeech [ 16 ]
960
90%
ASR
CompA-R [ 5 ]
159
2.5%
AQA
DCASE2025 Task5 [ 24 ]
7.4
2.5%
AQA
Clotho-AQA [ 13 ]
7.4
2.5%
AQA
CochlScene [ 8 ]
169
2.5%
ASC
Table 2: Training datasets.
Task
Frozen LLM
Audio FT
WikiText-2 (BPB; ↓ )
0.88
1.32
HellaSwag (Accuracy; ↑ )
47.3
38.2
GSM8K (Accuracy; ↑ )
57.8
2.0
Table 3: Benchmark scores on text tasks.
Model
LibriSpeech
Long
Architecture-only
5.68/7.44/6.97/6.37
120.68
+ Noisy RoPE
2.13/3.97/2.21/4.09
10.49
+ KV Scale Matching
1.91/3.73/2.07/3.91
4.70
Table 4: Effect of training techniques on ASR WER (%). The four LibriSpeech values correspond to dev-clean/dev-other/test-clean/test-other.