TACTIC: Understanding Tactile Encoders and Conditioning for Contact-rich Robot Manipulation Policies
Organizations: University of Technology Nuremberg, Germany. · Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Germany. · Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Germany. · Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany. · University of Tromso, DLR-German Aerospace Center · Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Germany.
Abstract
Tactile information is essential for contact-rich manipulation tasks in robotics. Vision-based tactile sensors make it particularly easy to design end-to-end manipulation policies with tactile sensing, as they enable the use of existing encoders from computer vision. However, this has led to a huge variety of architectures, training datasets, and evaluation protocols, making it difficult to determine which design choices best encode touch. In this work, we address this gap and present a comprehensive study of tactile encoders and fusion strategies across various contact-rich manipulation tasks in real-world experiments. To enable a controlled comparison, we train and evaluate all models under the same pipeline and experimental setup, comprising more than 2000 real-world rollouts. Our results go beyond other studies that only compare simulation performance, which does not necessarily translate to real-world settings, where large-scale evaluations are needed to obtain reliable statistics. Our key finding is that there is no universally optimal representation or fusion strategy for encoding visual-tactile. Instead, the best encoder backbone and fusion scheme depend strongly on the task.
Figures & tables
| Method | Sparsh | T 3 | SARL | UniT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.138 | 0.174 | 0.055 | 0.036 |
| Encoder | Screw (CLIP-R / CLIP-T) | Vase (CLIP-R / CLIP-T) |
|---|---|---|
| SPARSH | 5.16 / 4.25 | 3.40 / 1.60 |
| T 3 | 1.10 / 0.65 | 0.80 / 0.50 |
| SARL | 1.22 / 1.05 | 0.71 / 0.40 |
| UniT | 1.02 / 1.30 | 1.03 / 1.27 |