Uniform discrete diffusion models (UDMs) commonly use explicit time conditioning, but we find that it can often be unnecessary in practice. In this paper, we first show that the population-optimal UDM predictor generally depends on time: time controls how much the model should trust the observed context. We then show that this dependence can become negligible in finite-data settings relevant to language. When a corrupted training sequence remains much closer to its original clean sequence than to competing training sequences, the empirical-optimal predictor is nearly insensitive to time over most of the diffusion trajectory, where the guarantee weakens toward the high-noise endpoint. Empirically, trained language UDMs exhibit limited time sensitivity over most of the trajectory, while time-agnostic predictors remain competitive with, and often outperform, time-conditioned models across datasets and training objectives. These results challenge the use of explicit time conditioning in UDMs: although the population optimum depends on time, explicitly conditioning on it may often be unnecessary in practice.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Empirical separation of OWT training data. Left : distribution of the minimum Hamming distance d(x) from each training sequence to the remaining data, with median d(x)=988 . Right : distribution of the largest post-corruption separation margin Δ across diffusion times. The dashed line marks Δ=6 , which implies an oracle Fisher-sensitivity bound below 10−5 for t≤0.933 . Small separation occurs primarily when z is sampled near the extreme high-noise endpoint.
Figure 2: Left : Fisher sensitivity of Duality and LOO+CE , varying z sampling time tcorruption∈{0.01,0.50,0.99} and evaluating Fisher sensitivity on every time coordinate. Right : Per-time NLL difference between time-agnostic and time-variant UDMs.
Agnostic
Variant
Duality
24.33
25.54
LOO+CE
25.29
25.29
Table 2: Validation PPL on OWT.
Appendix figures & tables2 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 3: Sampling performance of time-variant and time-agnostic UDMs across different numbers of function evaluations (NFEs). We compare generative perplexity as the sampling budget varies under (a) Duality and (b) LOO+CE ; the annotated values report the entropy of generated samples.
Figure 4: Fisher sensitivity under different time-input reparameterizations, where z sampling time and Fisher sensitivity evaluation time are equal. All sensitivities are measured with respect to the original diffusion time t , not reparametrized time t^ for model input.
Discrete diffusion models are often trained through clean-data prediction, but the prediction can be used in different ways to define the reverse dynamics. In Masked Diffusion Models (MDM) these choices largely coincide, whereas in Uniform Diffusion Models (UDM) they do not. We show that the standard plug-in bridge parameterization for UDM is not optimized by the denoising posterior, but by a leave-one-out posterior that predicts each clean token without using its own noisy observation. This identifies a mismatch between the plug-in ELBO and the usual cross-entropy denoising objective. We characterize the leave-one-out target and derive exact conversions between the denoiser, the leave-one-out posterior, and the score. These conversions allow us to disentangle parameterization and training objective. Our results also lead to inference improvements without any additional training through an informed predictor-corrector sampler and improved temperature sampling based on the leave-one-out predictor. We further introduce an absorbing-state reformulation of uniform diffusion that preserves the UDM joint law while decomposing it into masked-diffusion-like sampling operations, with simpler denoising posteriors, carry-over unmasking, and a natural remasking mechanism. On language modeling, leave-one-out parameterizations consistently improve UDM generation, while the absorbing construction matches or surpasses masked diffusion. These results suggest that the empirical gap between masked and uniform diffusion is driven less by the choice of marginals themselves than by parameterization and sampling design. The code and models can be found at https://github.com/samsongourevitch/rev_udm.
Although uniform diffusion language models (UDLMs) represent a promising diffusion paradigm, scaling them remains challenging. We identify the core obstacle as an over-uniform training objective and condition-target confusion during sampling. To address these, we propose Less Uniform Diffusion (LUDI), a novel UDLM framework. Specifically, we (i) introduce a less uniform loss that directs each reverse transition toward the clean token, and (ii) equip the model with per-token time embeddings that supply token-level corruption hints, enabling confidence-based few-step sampling. Experiments across scales show that LUDI yields cleaner supervision and improves few-step generation. We further continue-train a 7B autoregressive model into LUDI-7B, resulting in a UDLM capable of complex reasoning. It achieves a 3-token-per-step speedup over AR decoding and competitive performance compared with masked diffusion baselines, revealing that the full potential of UDLMs for complex generation remains to be unlocked.
Kaibo Wang, Ding Ding, Fangyu Ding +5
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · Huawei Foundation Model Department
When do language diffusion models memorize their training data, and how to quantitatively assess their true generative regime? We address these questions by showing that Uniform-based Discrete Diffusion Models (UDDMs) fundamentally behave as Associative Memories (AMs) with emergent creative capabilities. The core idea of an AM is to reliably recover stored data points as memories by establishing distinct basins of attraction around them. Historically, models like Hopfield networks use an explicit energy function to guarantee these stable attractors. We broaden this perspective by leveraging the observation that energy is not strictly necessary, as basins of attraction can also be formed via conditional likelihood maximization. By evaluating token recovery of training and test examples, we identify in UDDMs a sharp memorization-to-generalization transition governed by the size of the training dataset: as it increases, basins around training examples shrink and basins around unseen test examples expand, until both later converge to the same level. Crucially, we can detect this transition using only the conditional entropy of predicted token sequences: memorization is characterized by vanishing conditional entropy, while in the generalization regime the conditional entropy of most tokens remains finite. Thus, conditional entropy offers a practical probe for the memorization-to-generalization transition in deployed models.
Bao Pham, Mohammed J. Zaki, Luca Ambrogioni +2
1Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) · 2Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University · 3Dynamical Mind +1