Organizations: School of Computing and Information Systems, Master of IT in Business (MITB), Singapore Management University, Singapore 178903, Singapore · School of Computer Science and Technology, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China · Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, United States · CSG Digital Operations Software Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, China · School of Cyber Science and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen Campus, Shenzhen 518107, China · College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
Existing text-to-video (T2V) jailbreak methods mainly seek more effective or stealthier attack candidates. In guarded T2V systems, however, video generation and security evaluation are costly, so an attacker often cannot test a large candidate pool. We therefore formulate T2V jailbreak as a query-constrained candidate allocation and ranking problem and propose TempQ-Jail. The method combines heterogeneous attack mechanisms to expand candidate coverage, estimates each candidate's end-to-end attack value from security-gate passage, dangerous visual generation, preservation of the original intent, and temporal validity, and ranks candidates so that high-value attacks appear early in a limited query trajectory. We evaluate TempQ-Jail on CogVideoX-5B using 70 common viable intents derived from T2VSafetyBench and compare it with six representative T2V jailbreak methods under a unified protocol. TempQ-Jail achieves TP-ASR@5 and TP-ASR@10 of 48.9% and 65.4%, improving over the strongest baselines by 4.6 and 4.0 percentage points, respectively. It also obtains the highest AUC-TP (0.469) and the lowest AvgQ (6.3). Analyses of query trajectories, candidate allocation, failure attribution, and ablations show that TempQ-Jail more effectively identifies and prioritises candidates with complete attack potential under limited query budgets.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Under a limited target query budget, the effectiveness of a T2V jailbreak depends not only on whether valid candidates exist, but on whether they are reached before the budget is exhausted. An unguided query order wastes the budget on low-value candidates, whereas TempQ-Jail estimates end-to-end attack utility and ranks candidates so that effective ones enter the query trajectory earlier.
Figure 2: Overall workflow of TempQ-Jail. Heterogeneous Candidate Construction builds a fixed, diverse candidate pool for each unsafe intent; End-to-End Attack Value Estimation scores every candidate on gate passability, hazardous visual risk, temporal persistence, semantic preservation and prediction uncertainty; Budget-Aware Candidate Ranking turns these utilities into a single query priority sequence that is submitted to the guarded T2V system until a TP-Success occurs or the budget Bmax is exhausted.
Method
ASR@5 ↑
TP-ASR@5 ↑
ASR@10 ↑
TP-ASR@10 ↑
AUC-TP ↑
AvgQ ↓
DACA
55.4
43.4
72.9
61.4
0.419
6.8
T2V-OptJail
57.1
44.3
77.1
57.1
0.425
6.8
SceneSplit
18.3
12.9
35.7
24.3
0.143
9.6
SPARK
18.6
17.7
25.7
21.4
0.165
9.4
TFM
19.1
13.1
27.1
20.0
0.129
9.7
BSB
34.3
26.6
47.1
38.6
0.261
8.4
Table 1: Overall attack performance comparison under different target query budgets.
Figure 3: TP-ASR@ B under different target query budgets on the 70 common viable intents. All budgets share one nested query trajectory, so a higher curve at small B means effective candidates are placed earlier in the query sequence.
Candidate Source
Initial Pool
Top-5 Ranked
(%)
(%)
Generic
25
8
DACA-derived
25
34
T2V-OptJail-derived
25
32
Hybrid
25
26
Table 2: Candidate source distributions in the initial pool and the Top-5 ranked candidates.
Figure 4: Failure attribution of the target queries actually executed by each attack method. Every query is assigned to exactly one of five outcomes, and querying stops after the first TP-Success; the TP-Success shares are therefore computed per query and are not directly comparable with the per-intent TP-ASR@ B values in Table 1 .
Variant
TP-ASR ↑
AUC-TP ↑
AvgQ ↓
B=5
B=10
w/o HCC
45.2
61.1
0.438
6.6
w/o EAVE
42.0
57.8
0.401
7.0
w/o BACR
44.6
60.5
0.423
6.8
TempQ-Jail
48.9
65.4
0.469
6.3
Table 3: Ablation study of the three core modules in TempQ-Jail.
Category
DACA
T2V-OptJail
SceneSplit
SPARK
TFM
BSB
TempQ-Jail
Violence
49
47
21
19
13
24
57
Gore
7
41
4
0
5
8
27
Self-harm
49
43
11
30
16
33
56
Illegal Activity
66
50
23
29
21
43
61
Disturbing Content
50
40
6
6
14
28
38
Pornography
53
40
0
33
0
20
67
Table 4: Category-wise TP-ASR@5 performance across six security risk categories.
College of Science, Mathematics and Technology, Wenzhou-Kean University · AI Security Lab · State Key Laboratory of Complex & Critical Software Environment, Beihang University
May 3, 2026·Quanchen Zou, Nizhang Li, Wenxin Zhang +4T2V Generation
AI Security Lab, Beijing, China · Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China +3