Organizations: X-LANCE Lab, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China · Shanghai Innovation Institute, China · SJTU Paris Elite Institute of Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China · Nanyang Technological University
Text-to-audio (TTA) generation has advanced rapidly in generation quality and instruction following. However, representative systems often require around a billion parameters, limiting deployment on resource-constrained devices. This paper introduces TinyAudio, a compact flow-matching-based TTA model for low-resource deployment. At its core, TinyAudio uses TA-DiT, a 35M single-stream flow-matching Transformer. TinyAudio also includes TA-CLAP, a 32M audio-aligned text encoder, and TA-VAE, whose 20M decoder reconstructs 44.1 kHz audio from compressed latents. TinyAudio has only 87M parameters in total, over 90% fewer than representative billion-parameter pipelines, and uses 0.48 GB peak GPU memory. TinyAudio achieves competitive generation quality on AudioCaps and TTA-Bench. We further introduce TinyAudio-MF, a MeanFlow-accelerated model that enables real-time generation with a four-core CPU quota. Our results demonstrate a practical quality-footprint trade-off for low-resource TTA deployment.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: AudioCaps quality versus generator size. Bubble labels indicate generator parameters, and lower FD is better. TinyAudio operates in a substantially smaller parameter regime while retaining competitive distributional quality.
Figure 2: Single-stream TA-DiT. Projected text tokens and noised audio latents are concatenated for joint self-attention. The right panel shows layer-shared conditional modulation: shared MLPs combine text, timestep, and block embeddings to produce shift–scale and gate parameters. Only audio tokens predict latent velocity.
Model
Footprint / Efficiency
AudioCaps
TTA-Bench
Gen.
Deploy.
Mem.
NFE
RTF
FAD ↓
FD ↓
KL ↓
IS ↑
CE ↑
CU ↑
PC ↑
PQ ↑
CLAP ↑
AudioLDM-L-Full
739M
953M
3.89 GB
200 × 2
1.190
4.32
29.50
1.68
8.17
3.275
5.137
3.219
5.854
0.441
AudioLDM2-Large
718M
1467M
5.93 GB
200 × 2
4.173
3.45
25.53
1.65
7.98
3.441
5.440
2.957
5.984
0.415
Tango-Full
866M
1295M
5.28 GB
200 × 2
1.880
2.68
15.64
1.24
8.78
3.264
5.151
3.360
5.954
0.440
Tango-2-Full
866M
1295M
5.28 GB
200 × 2
1.879
2.87
15.93
1.20
10.05
3.468
5.196
3.800
5.895
0.467
MeanAudio-L-Full
480M
1032M
4.79 GB
25
0.057
2.59
14.06
1.21
12.46
3.304
5.151
2.995
5.743
0.469
Table 1: Generation quality, deployment footprint, and inference efficiency. Gen. and Deploy. denote generator and total inference-time parameter counts. Mem. (peak GPU memory during inference) and RTF (end-to-end real-time factor) are measured for all systems on a single GPU in FP32 with batch size 1. NFE counts function evaluations; ×2 indicates classifier-free guidance. Bold and underline indicate best and second-best results. TTA-Bench results use the Accuracy subset, with baseline values following the Resonate evaluation. [ 16 ]
Model
OVL ↑
REL ↑
TinyAudio
3.560 ± 0.985
3.520 ± 0.940
TangoFlux
3.505 ± 0.989
3.600 ± 0.992
EzAudio
3.155 ± 1.169
3.190 ± 1.169
AudioLDM
3.015 ± 1.004
2.730 ± 0.962
Table 2: Subjective evaluation of overall quality (OVL) and text relevance (REL). Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Best and second-best scores are shown in bold and underlined.
Setting
FAD ↓
KL ↓
IS ↑
Base
2.494
1.399
10.695
Architecture
Per-block AdaLN
2.658
1.370
10.455
Dual-stream MMDiT
3.168
1.349
10.093
Text Conditioning
w/o CLAP adaptation
4.051
1.593
8.466
Table 3: Component ablations on the AudioCaps test set. All variants are trained for 200K steps on the combined AudioSet and AudioCaps corpus; Base denotes the corresponding complete TA-DiT configuration.
Model
Params
T → A
A → T
R@1
R@5
R@10
R@1
R@5
R@10
LAION-CLAP
200M
35.1
71.9
83.7
44.2
80.8
90.3
TA-CLAP
67M
36.1
70.2
83.0
48.9
80.9
90.6
Table 5: Audio–text retrieval performance of TA-CLAP on AudioCaps test split.
Text-to-Audio Generation creates speech, music, and sound effects from natural-language prompts, aiming to match their content, timing, and acoustic qualities.