A literature-guided descriptor-based framework for filtering composition search spaces
Organizations: Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Materials Simulation, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44780 Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Abstract
Scientific literature contains latent knowledge about materials behavior, but much of this knowledge is expressed through words, contexts, and recurring associations rather than explicit design principles. This raises a central question: how can large-scale scientific corpora be used for practical problems in materials discovery? Here, we present a literature-guided descriptor-based filtering framework for reducing composition search spaces. For a given performance metric, the framework selects two descriptors from a filtered vocabulary in a literature-trained word embedding model and uses the selected descriptors to construct a Pareto-based filter for candidate compositions. Across the evaluated performance metrics and composition search spaces, the framework filters out an average of 74.27% of the candidate compositions, with an average best-value error of 1.93% relative to experimental measurements. Compared with expert-chosen and random descriptors, our performance metric-dependent descriptors provide a more controlled balance between retained fraction and best-value error. These results show that literature-derived embeddings can support intuitive and reproducible filters for narrowing candidate composition spaces while preserving high-performing compositions.
Figures & tables
| Performance metric | Selected descriptors | Avg. ret. | Avg. err. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current density | cyclability + rhombic | ||
| Onset overpotential | instability + spce | ||
| Resistance | capacity + intermetallic | ||
| Stability | cyclability + rhombic |
| Performance metric | Expert-chosen descriptors | Avg. ret. | Avg. err. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current density | dielectric + conductivity | ||
| Onset overpotential | dielectric + conductivity | ||
| Resistance | dielectric + conductivity | ||
| Stability | dielectric + conductivity |
Appendix figures & tables12 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Composition search space | Applied potential | Selected descriptors | Full count | Retained count | Best/full | Best/retained | Best-value error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag-Au-Pd-Pt-Rh | -300 mV | cyclability + rhombic | 327 | 24 | -1.13 | -1.13 | 0.00 |
| Ag-Au-Pd-Pt-Ru | -300 mV | cyclability + rhombic | 335 | 14 | -1.49 | -1.45 | 2.84 |
| Ag-Pd-Pt | 850 mV | cyclability + rhombic | 341 | 14 | -0.58 | -0.49 | 16.41 |
| Ag-Pd-Pt-Ru | 850 mV | cyclability + rhombic | 341 | 31 | -0.37 | -0.37 | 0.00 |
| Ag-Pd-Ru | 850 mV | cyclability + rhombic | 342 | 33 | -0.67 | -0.67 | 0.00 |
| Composition search space | Selected descriptors | Full count | Retained count | Best/full | Best/retained | Best-value error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe-Co-Ni | instability + spce | 22 | 10 | 394.00 | 394.00 | 0.00 |
| Composition search space | Selected descriptors | Full count | Retained count | Best/full | Best/retained | Best-value error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ir-Pd-Pt-Rh-Ru | capacity + intermetallic | 342 | 94 | 1.49 | 1.49 | 0.00 |
| Composition search space | Time interval | Selected descriptors | Full count | Retained count | Best/full | Best/retained | Best-value error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe-Co-Ni | cyclability + rhombic | 22 | 11 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.00 | |
| Fe-Co-Ni | cyclability + rhombic | 22 | 11 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.00 | |
| Fe-Co-Ni | cyclability + rhombic | 22 | 11 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
| Composition search space | Applied potential | Expert-chosen descriptors | Full count | Retained count | Best/full | Best/retained | Best-value error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag-Au-Pd-Pt-Rh | -300 mV | dielectric + conductivity | 327 | 9 | -1.13 | -1.09 | 3.80 |
| Ag-Au-Pd-Pt-Ru | -300 mV | dielectric + conductivity | 335 | 20 | -1.49 | -1.45 | 2.84 |
| Ag-Pd-Pt | 850 mV | dielectric + conductivity | 341 | 15 | -0.58 | -0.45 | 23.40 |
| Ag-Pd-Pt-Ru | 850 mV | dielectric + conductivity | 341 | 13 | -0.37 | -0.37 | 0.00 |
| Ag-Pd-Ru | 850 mV | dielectric + conductivity | 342 | 14 | -0.67 | -0.67 | 0.00 |
| Composition search space | Expert-chosen descriptors | Full count | Retained count | Best/full | Best/retained | Best-value error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe-Co-Ni | dielectric + conductivity | 22 | 14 | 394.00 | 394.00 | 0.00 |
| Composition search space | Expert-chosen descriptors | Full count | Retained count | Best/full | Best/retained | Best-value error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ir-Pd-Pt-Rh-Ru | dielectric + conductivity | 342 | 30 | 1.49 | 1.47 | 1.67 |
| Composition search space | Time interval | Expert-chosen descriptors | Full count | Retained count | Best/full | Best/retained | Best-value error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe-Co-Ni | dielectric + conductivity | 22 | 14 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.00 | |
| Fe-Co-Ni | dielectric + conductivity | 22 | 14 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.00 | |
| Fe-Co-Ni | dielectric + conductivity | 22 | 14 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
| Performance metric | Seeds | Mean ret. (%) | SD ret. (%) | Mean err. (%) | SD err. (%) | Best err. (%) | Worst err. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current density | 100 | 22.10 | 8.54 | 5.44 | 3.30 | 0.09 | 19.18 |
| Onset overpotential | 100 | 57.00 | 16.51 | 0.76 | 3.79 | 0.00 | 22.08 |
| Resistance | 100 | 15.28 | 10.71 | 2.57 | 4.60 | 0.00 | 20.24 |
| Stability | 100 | 57.00 | 16.51 | 218.02 | 257.04 | 0.00 | 848.22 |