cs.LGSep 26, 2026

Beyond the Manifold Hypothesis: Hybrid Spectral Parameterizations for Flow Matching

Authors: Ségolène Martin, Anne Gagneux, Quentin Bertrand, Rémi Emonet, Mathurin Massias

Organizations: Inria, ENS de Lyon, CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, LIP UMR 5668, 69342 Lyon Cedex 07, France · ENS de Lyon, CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inria, LIP UMR 5668, 69342 Lyon Cedex 07, France · Université Jean Monnet Saint-Étienne, CNRS, Institut d’Optique Graduate School, Inria, Laboratoire Hubert Curien UMR 5516, F-42023 Saint-Étienne, France · Institut Universitaire de France

Abstract

Flow matching and diffusion can be trained to predict different quantities, most commonly the data x1x_1, the source noise x0x_0, or the velocity~vv. Although theoretically equivalent, these can lead to substantially different performances. We identify two main drivers for these differences: the source--data signal-to-noise ratio, and the information bottleneck induced by the neural architecture. We show that, beyond intrinsic data dimension, the factor affecting the optimal parametrization the most is a certain signal-to-noise ratio in each data covariance direction. From this analysis, we introduce new spectral hybrid parameterizations that adapt across time and data covariance directions; we show that these are optimal for Gaussian data. We also show that architecture-induced compression changes which parameterization is easier to learn, with vv-prediction being more sensitive to discarded directions than x1x_1-prediction. Experiments across architectures and source scales show that our spectral parameterizations are robust across regimes, can substantially accelerate optimization, while incurring essentially no additional training cost compared with standard parameterizations.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables11 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Mar 6, 2026

Training Flow Matching: The Role of Weighting and Parameterization

We study the training objectives of denoising-based generative models, with a particular focus on loss weighting and output parameterization, including noise-, clean image-, and velocity-based formulations. Through a systematic numerical study, we analyze how these training choices interact with the intrinsic dimensionality of the data manifold, model architecture, and dataset size. Our experiments span synthetic datasets with controlled geometry as well as image data, and compare training objectives using quantitative metrics for denoising accuracy (PSNR across noise levels) and generative quality (FID). Rather than proposing a new method, our goal is to disentangle the various factors that matter when training a flow matching model, in order to provide practical insights on design choices.
Mar 2, 2026

Preconditioned Flow Matching

Flow matching (FM) learns vector fields by regressing stochastic velocity targets along intermediate distributions ptp_t. We identify a geometric optimization bottleneck in this regression problem: when the covariance ΣtΣ_t of ptp_t is ill-conditioned, gradient-based training rapidly fits high-variance directions while making slow progress along low-variance ones. In an exactly solvable Gaussian setting, we prove that the excess risk is weighted by ΣtΣ_t, and that both gradient descent and stochastic gradient descent inherit condition-number-dependent convergence. We then extend the analysis to Gaussian mixtures, showing that multimodality does not average away this effect; instead, the slowest and worst-conditioned component can control optimization. Motivated by this analysis, we propose preconditioned flow matching\textit{preconditioned flow matching}, a precondition-then-match framework that transforms the target distribution into a more isotropic representation, trains the main flow in the transformed space, and maps generated samples back through the inverse transformation. We show theoretically that preconditioning reshapes the intermediate FM path and improves its conditioning. Across controlled Gaussian and Gaussian-mixture experiments, latent MNIST and other high resolution image datasets up to 512×512512{\times}512 resolution, preconditioning improves path-conditioning diagnostics, low-eigenvalue recovery, FID, MMD, precision, and recall. Compute-matched baselines and preconditioner-quality ablations further show that the gains are not explained merely by additional preconditioner parameters, but by improved geometry of the downstream flow matching problem. GitHub: https://github.com/ahxmeds/preconditioned-flow-matching.git.
Mar 14, 2026

Spectral Edge Dynamics of Training Trajectories: Signal--Noise Geometry Across Scales

Despite hundreds of millions of parameters, transformer training trajectories evolve within only a few coherent directions. We introduce Spectral Edge Dynamics (SED) to quantify this structure: a rolling-window SVD of parameter updates reveals a sharp boundary -- the spectral edge -- between coherent optimization directions and stochastic noise, identified via the maximum consecutive singular value ratio σk/σk+1σ_k / σ_{k+1}. Across a 51M-parameter TinyStories model (4 seeds) and GPT-2 124M under distribution shift, the spectral edge exhibits a universal three-phase pattern (rise, plateau, collapse). The effective signal rank adapts to task complexity (k∗=2k^* = 2 at 51M, k∗=3k^* = 3 at 124M), and the directional coupling between spectral geometry and validation loss reverses with window size -- a lag flip reflecting the timescale of trajectory integration. Johnson--Lindenstrauss projection to d=10Wd = 10W dimensions (e.g., d=100d = 100 for W=10W = 10) preserves the spectral gap within 5.7%5.7\%, making the framework applicable to models of arbitrary scale. In companion work, the same spectral geometry provides early-warning signals of grokking -- predicting generalization 600600--1,7001{,}700 steps before it occurs across modular arithmetic, Dyck languages, and the SCAN benchmark.