cs.CRSep 26, 2026

Ask Without Telling: Local SLMs Consult Cloud LLMs Without Revealing Task Intent

Authors: Yanmeng Wang, Yunxuan Li, Shilong Fan, Yuhan Zheng, Tsung-Hui Chang

Organizations: Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, 210023, China · The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518172, China

Abstract

As local small language models (SLMs) increasingly collaborate with more capable cloud large language models (LLMs), a natural privacy question arises: Can a local SLM obtain cloud LLM guidance while protecting user privacy? Existing privacy-preserving SLM-LLM frameworks primarily hide sensitive values while preserving task semantics, which can still expose what the user is trying to accomplish. For example, allocating scarce medical supplies across hospitals may signal an emerging public-health emergency, while rebalancing an investment portfolio may reveal a private investment strategy, even when names and numerical values are hidden. Recent decoy-based methods further obscure task intent by hiding the real request among alternatives, but stronger protection relies on more decoys or semantic abstraction, increasing overhead or risking utility loss. More fundamentally, existing work does not systematically characterize the components of private task intent or how each should be protected. We therefore introduce task-private consultation, which characterizes task intent through two components: task context and task operation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic study of these components and their individual and joint protection in local-cloud SLM-LLM consultation. To realize this setting, we propose PriCon, an end-to-end framework that transforms the task itself through recoverable mathematical reformulation rather than hiding it among alternatives. A local closed-loop refinement mechanism further maintains privacy and recoverability throughout consultation. Experiments on 100 tasks show that PriCon reduces cloud-side task-intent inference Hit@1 to nearly 0%, versus 93-99% under sensitive-value removal and 3-30% under decoy-based protection, while preserving cloud-assisted utility.

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. P2Skill: Privacy Preserving Skill Distillation for Cloud-Local LLM Inference Systems

    Aug 14, 2026Myunghoon Ryu, Geunpyo Park, Sungjoon Lee +2Skill DistillationPrivacy-Preserving Language Models

  2. SharedRequest: Privacy-Preserving Model-Agnostic Inference for Large Language Models

    Jun 3, 2026Peihua Mai, Xuanrong Gao, Youlong Ding +3Privacy-Preserving Language ModelsLLM Inference

  3. Privacy Guard & Token Parsimony by Prompt and Context Handling and LLM Routing

    Mar 30, 2026Alessio LangiuPrivacy Protection for LLM AgentsPrivacy Leakage in Language Models