cs.SDSep 26, 2026

Whisper-Flash: Acoustically Conditioned Parallel Drafting for Faster Whisper Decoding

Authors: Huapeng Zhou, Huayu Wang, Junkai Wu, Kangqi Wang, Xinyu Wang

Organizations: Boson AI · University of Washington · Independent Researcher · McGill University

Abstract

Whisper is a widely used encoder-decoder model for speech recognition. Its encoder reads an utterance in one parallel pass, but its decoder writes the transcript one token at a time, which dominates inference time. Speculative decoding shortens such loops without changing their output: a small drafter guesses several upcoming tokens, and the original model verifies them all in one forward pass. We present Whisper-Flash, a two-layer drafter built on a property of speech recognition: the words still to be written have already been spoken. It reads Whisper's encoded audio and accepted decoder states and proposes eight tokens in a single forward pass. On the complete LibriSpeech test sets, Whisper-Flash processes 3.16×/2.85×3.16\times/2.85\times as much audio per second as greedy decoding with identical outputs, and it remains faster at batch sizes up to 96 and under temperature sampling. Ablations show that direct access to the audio matters most.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables7 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Mar 6, 2026

Whisper-CD: Accurate Long-Form Speech Recognition using Multi-Negative Contrastive Decoding

Long-form speech recognition with large encoder-decoder models such as Whisper often exhibit hallucinations, repetition loops, and content omissions. These errors can accumulate and be further amplified when the previous segment's transcription is used as decoding context. We propose Whisper-CD, a training-free contrastive decoding framework that contrasts clean-audio logits against negative logits computed from three acoustically motivated perturbations: Gaussian noise injection, silence signal, and audio temporal shift. We aggregate these negatives via the log-sum-exp operator, building a unified multi-negative objective for token-by-token decoding. Across five English long-form benchmarks, Whisper-CD reduces WER by up to 24.3pp on CORAAL and shows 48% faster token generation throughput than beam search. Because Whisper-CD operates purely at inference time, it can be applied as a drop-in replacement to already-deployed Whisper systems without retraining.
Sep 29, 2026

LongSpark: Efficient speculative decoding with a fixed-cost parallel drafter

Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive inference by verifying multiple draft tokens in a single target forward pass. However, as the context grows, existing state-of-the-art drafters become increasingly expensive, eroding the very efficiency advantage they are designed to provide. We argue that this scaling is unnecessary. A standalone language model must grow with its prefix because it is solely responsible for every token it produces. A drafter, by contrast, only proposes candidates; the target catches and corrects every error before any token is committed. The drafter's decoding cost can therefore be made entirely independent of the prefix length. We introduce LongSpark, a block-diffusion drafter that achieves this by extracting fixed-size, multiscale views from the target's verification pass, thereby eliminating the need for a growing persistent state. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that LongSpark achieves state-of-the-art end-to-end efficiency across multiple model scales and realistic serving conditions. Notably, it delivers the lowest time-per-output-token on long-context tasks while reducing the drafter's context state by several orders of magnitude.
Aug 13, 2026

Alignment Drift in Single-Model Speculative Decoding for ASR: Mechanism, Correction, and Cost

Speculative decoding speeds up generation by letting a cheap draft propose several tokens that a target model checks in one pass. In the single-model form, the draft is a lightweight module attached to the target rather than a separate model. Applying this design to Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) introduces an extra problem. The draft can read the whole audio at every step, yet its proposals get worse as it runs on its own. Access is not localization. The accepted text keeps the transcript position explicit, but the draft must also track the changing audio position. In the primary matched comparison, per-step audio access changes the first proposal modestly but roughly doubles later-proposal acceptance. Fixed-width windows show that the audio position explains part of this gap. A correctly placed window recovers continuation, while an equally narrow window at the wrong position reduces it. Late-draft median error reaches 21 frames in the hardest reported condition, while target attention during verification stays within a 2-frame median. We test two ways to reduce this drift. The first reads the audio position from verification attention and uses it to guide the next draft round. It saves time only when the extra accepted tokens offset the readout cost. The second is AnchorDraft, which teaches the draft to track the audio position during training without changing the inference graph. The trained draft improves end-to-end speed at both tested target scales. These results show that ASR self-speculation depends on token prediction, audio-position tracking, and draft cost.