The Privacy Fallacy of Crowdsourced Fine-Tuning: Extracting Proprietary Data via Topic-Based Poisoning

Large Language Models are increasingly trained on proprietary or sensitive data, from private healthcare and financial records to user conversations containing secrets. Ensuring the privacy of such data against extraction attacks has become a central concern. In this paper, we ask whether an attacker who can poison a portion of the training data can facilitate the leakage of a separate target record they have no access to. We answer in the affirmative and show that such leakage can be induced by a poisoning mechanism that reshapes the model's local loss landscape around the target completion. Our key insight is that poisoning to create a sharp loss minimum at the target, surrounded by elevated loss on nearby alternatives, forces the model to memorize the target as the unique low-loss solution in its neighborhood. The attack requires no architectural changes, and generalizes across centralized and federated learning settings. We demonstrate that the attack amplifies privacy leakage across language (up to 100% successful extraction), and vision-language models (up 90% successful extraction). We show that the attack is thwarted when the model is trained to be differentially private. However, we introduce a new attack that directly probes the loss landscape bypassing even differential privacy defenses.

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) can exhibit problematic memorization of individual training examples. Empirical privacy auditing (EPA) quantifies this risk by measuring realistic data leakage on membership inference (MI) or reconstruction attacks. A key challenge in EPA is designing ``canary'' examples that are mixed with the privacy-sensitive training data. We propose generating synthetic canaries via high-temperature sampling ($T \geq 0.8$) from LLMs, using prompts tailored to the privacy-sensitive training data. These canaries act as high-influence outliers, ensuring high identifiability and hence strong audits. Further, since the canaries are themselves non-private, they are inspectable and can be inserted with repetition without jeopardizing the privacy of the real data. An important use of models fine-tuned on privacy-sensitive data is the generation of synthetic data. This also comes with privacy risk. We introduce a powerful synthetic data audit based on fine-tuning an auxiliary model on the synthetic data. Auditing the auxiliary model for the original canaries then provides a strong estimate of the privacy leakage through the synthetic data. Finally, leveraging our strong auditing methodologies, we perform a systematic investigation into the interacting effects of model capacity and canary entropy on memorization.

Large language models (LLMs) are commonly adapted to downstream tasks through fine-tuning, but fine-tuning data often contains sensitive information that may be leaked by the resulting model. Differential privacy (DP) offers formal protection against such leakage, yet DP fine-tuning of LLMs still suffers from substantial utility degradation due to gradient clipping and noise injection. Existing work improves this trade-off by combining DP with parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods such as LoRA, which constrain the form of updates. In this work, we study a complementary direction: selective fine-tuning, which constrains where updates are applied. We propose DP-SelFT, a framework for differentially private selective fine-tuning of LLMs. DP-SelFT addresses three DP-specific challenges in parameter selection: avoiding repeated privacy cost, improving stability under noisy estimates, and selecting parameters that remain useful under clipped and noisy updates. It first constructs a lightweight DP synthetic dataset and performs selection only on this synthetic data, so the selection stage incurs no additional privacy cost. It then conducts layer-level selection by temporarily training candidate layer subsets on a synthetic training split and evaluating them on a synthetic validation split. Crucially, this temporary training is performed under a perturbation regime matched to downstream DP fine-tuning, with worst-case perturbations of the same scale as DP noise. This favors layer subsets that are not only learnable but also robust to noisy private updates. Experiments on benchmark tasks show that DP-SelFT consistently improves the privacy--utility trade-off over existing DP fine-tuning baselines under the same privacy guarantees.