cs.LGSep 28, 2026

Manifold-Stable Flow Matching

Authors: Amirhossein Nazerian, Ali Pezeshki, Jianguo Zhao

Organizations: Department of Mechanical Engineering Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA · Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA

Abstract

Flow matching (FM) learns generative dynamics through velocity regression. Geometric FM variants commonly assume a prior supported on the data manifold, requiring geometric knowledge that is often unavailable. Without such knowledge, low regression error alone does not guarantee manifold adherence. Adherence keeps generated samples within valid configurations and is empirically associated with better task performance. We introduce manifold-stable flow matching (MSFM), which can start from an arbitrary ambient prior, not necessarily supported on the manifold. Using tools from nonlinear dynamics, namely contraction theory, MSFM combines learned tangential transport with prescribed normal contraction. The construction uses analytical projectors for known manifolds and local affine proxies estimated by principal component analysis for unknown data geometry. By implementing contraction theory in both cases of known and unknown manifolds, we guarantee manifold invariance and transverse convergence to the manifold within a desired time window (e.g., one second). We derive a family of compatible probability paths and decompose the training loss into a learnable tangential term and a normal residual. An ellipse experiment attains a mean terminal off-manifold error of order 10−610^{-6}. In Push-T robotic experiments, MSFM raises success from 74%74\% to 82%82\%. In the Robomimic Square task, success increases from 60%60\% to 72%72\%, while rotation-manifold deviation decreases from order 10−210^{-2} to 10−710^{-7}. The MSFM terminal geometric errors are controlled by the chosen numerical tolerance. These results demonstrate stronger geometric adherence and higher observed task performance, supporting prescribed normal contraction as a complement to learned generative transport.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Let the Dynamics Flow: Stable Flow Matching Dynamical Systems

    Jun 2, 2026Rodrigo Pérez-Dattari, Francisco Leiva, Andrea Testa +3Imitation LearningMultimodal Action Distributions

  2. ConFlow: Constraints-Guided Learning with Flow Matching for Motion Generation

    Jul 15, 2026Nutan Chen, Jianxiang Feng, Marvin Alles +1Contrastive Flow MatchingHuman Motion Generation

  3. Mean Flow Distillation: Robust and Stable Distillation for Flow Matching Models

    Jun 9, 2026An Zhao, Shengyuan Zhang, Zhongjian Sun +5Contrastive Flow MatchingDataset Distillation