Decoding Affective Nuances: Enhancing MLLMs via Hierarchical Emotion Reasoning and Contrastive Discriminative Pruning

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown remarkable progress in visual reasoning and understanding tasks but still struggle to capture the complexity and subjectivity of human emotions. Existing approaches based on supervised fine-tuning often suffer from limited generalization and poor interpretability, while reinforcement learning methods such as Group Relative Policy Optimization fail to align with the intrinsic characteristics of emotional cognition. To address these challenges, we propose Reflective Reinforcement Learning for Emotional Reasoning (EMO-R3), a framework designed to enhance the emotional reasoning ability of MLLMs. Specifically, we introduce Structured Emotional Thinking to guide the model to perform step-by-step emotional reasoning in a structured and interpretable manner, and design a Reflective Emotional Reward that enables the model to re-evaluate its reasoning based on visual-text consistency and emotional coherence. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EMO-R3 significantly improves both the interpretability and emotional intelligence of MLLMs, achieving superior performance across multiple visual emotional understanding benchmarks.

Reinforcement Learning has significantly advanced the complex reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. However, prevailing RL algorithms suffer a severe failure in emotion reasoning tasks. These methods heavily rely on deterministic hard-label supervision and point-wise isolated evaluation, creating a fundamental gap with the inherently subjective and continuously distributed nature of human emotions. Furthermore, unlike explicit physical objects, emotional states are deeply implicit within visual cues. This abstract nature exacerbates visual hallucinations in MLLMs, leading to plausible yet ungrounded emotional evidence. To address these limitations, we propose Diversity-Aware Subjective Policy Optimization (DSPO), a reinforcement learning framework that jointly promotes subjective affective coverage and visual grounding. First, we construct a context-grounded emotional distribution prior in the VAD space by combining the lexical prior of the annotated emotion with image-specific contextual information. Based on this prior, we introduce a Distribution-Aligned Emotional Diversity Reward (DEDR), which measures the leave-one-out marginal contribution of each candidate emotion within a rollout. DEDR rewards candidates whose inclusion brings the predicted affective set closer to the context-grounded prior, thereby preserving plausible subjective interpretations without encouraging unconstrained dispersion. We further develop Counterfactual Visual Intervention Gating (CVIG), which masks the visual region highlighted in the reasoning process and uses the resulting candidate-wise probability changes to reduce the weights of interpretations unsupported by visual evidence. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DSPO achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple public benchmarks, especially on the cross-domain performance, i.e., improving +10.8% on average cross-domain accuracy than EMO-R3.

Comprehensive affective analysis is challenging for two reasons: it spans heterogeneous prediction tasks with continuous, ordinal, and multi-label outputs, and affective meaning is context-dependent, requiring conflicting cues to be reconciled rather than mapped directly to labels. Existing methods learn this mapping directly and do not model the reconciliation explicitly. We recast the task as a complex-reasoning problem, which yields one output interface across heterogeneous label spaces and a trajectory over which a verifiable reward can be optimised; to our knowledge, this is the first such treatment covering both sentiment and emotion. The obstacle is on the data side: affective reasoning traces must be synthesised, and generic synthesis is misaligned with the targets, tolerances, and phenomena of affect, and discards or leaks its failure cases. We propose NTDH, which addresses these four failures. Naturalisation sets the training answer to the gold label, so it is correct by construction. A Tolerance-aware gate checks each answer against the task's own scoring margin. Domain-aware strategies refine the reasoning using ideas from affective science. Directional Hints report only the type and direction of an error, without exposing the target. We train Qwen3-8B with SFT and then GRPO under the same tolerance used for verification (up to a more permissive construction gate on the multi-label subtask), and a component ablation quantifies the data-quality effect of each part. Using 16,302 training records, about 14x fewer than comparable instruction-tuned systems, the final policy improves over its SFT checkpoint on five of six official-test metrics and achieves the strongest EI-reg result among the compared systems, at a Pearson correlation of 0.862.