cs.AISep 4, 2026

Gradient-Aligned Pair Selection for Personalized Preference Optimization

Authors: Ruoming Jin, Xinyu Li, Hao Zhou, Jianfeng Zhu, Ruixin Guo, Feodor Dragan, Lei Xu, Haixun Wang, 

Organizations: Kent State University · EvenUp, USA · Auburn University

Abstract

Personalizing large language models (LLMs) requires aligning generation behavior with user-specific preferences rather than aggregate quality. While Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) provides a stable framework for preference learning, its effectiveness in personalized settings critically depends on how preference pairs are selected. Existing approaches typically rely on heuristic criteria, such as likelihood-based extremes, which decouple optimization from explicit user utility and can lead to degraded personalization. We formalize personalized preference learning as a geometry-aligned optimization problem by analyzing the first-order interaction between gradients of expected user utility and DPO update directions. Our analysis reveals that, under off-policy sampling, the DPO update transitions from a purely error-corrective signal to a reinforcement-like update when preference margins are directionally aligned with utility gradients. This perspective exposes pair selection as a geometric decision that governs whether preference optimization advances or hinders personalization. Motivated by this insight, we propose GAP-DPO (Geometry-Aligned Preference DPO), an iterative algorithm that performs utility-aware, geometry-aligned pair selection while controlling distribution shift via epoch-wise regeneration. Experiments on personalized text generation benchmarks show that GAP-DPO consistently improves stylistic fidelity, preference alignment, and generation quality compared to standard DPO variants. Together, our results establish gradient alignment as a unifying principle for personalized preference optimization and demonstrate that pair selection is an intrinsic component of the optimization geometry rather than a heuristic preprocessing step.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables4 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Personalized Group Relative Policy Optimization for Heterogenous Preference Alignment

    Feb 17, 2026Jialu Wang, Heinrich Peters, Asad A. Butt +6LLM AlignmentGroup Relative Policy Optimization

  2. Beyond Uniform Forgetting: A Study of Sequential Direct Preference Optimization Across Preference Settings

    Jun 18, 2026Pranav Bhandari, Nicolas Fay, Amitava Datta +2Continual Learning for LLMsDirect Preference Optimization

  3. AdaDPO: Self-Adaptive Direct Preference Optimization with Balanced Gradient Updates

    May 27, 2026Shaolong Chen, Madalina Ciobanu, Qingqing Mao +1LLM AlignmentDirect Preference Optimization