RIQE: a NIQE-style reference model for Computed Tomography

No-reference image quality assessment (NR IQA) has recently benefited from deep and multimodal models, yet many SOTA systems still violate at least one basic requirement: they either discard critical quality cues via aggressive resizing, fail to generalize across resolutions, cannot be jointly trained on heterogeneous IQA datasets with mismatched MOS scales, or require prohibitive computation. We present \textbf{ReLIQS}, a model for \textbf{Re}solution-agnostic \textbf{L}earning for \textbf{I}mage \textbf{Q}uality with \textbf{S}aliency, which is resolution-agnostic, preserves original-resolution quality cues, learns from multiple subjective studies, and remains computationally efficient and budget-adaptive. ReLIQS is a CLIP-based multiscale patch-driven architecture that learns both \emph{where to look} and \emph{how to judge} quality. Fixed-size patches are sampled across multiple resolutions, including the original resolution, and encoded with a CLIP vision backbone. A lightweight Perceptual Importance Estimator then predicts IQA-specific importance maps to select a small set of informative patches, and a Latent Quality Axis Module aggregates their embeddings into a single image-level score. Across authentic, synthetic, and AIGC benchmarks spanning diverse resolutions and distortions, ReLIQS generalizes better than strong CNN-, CLIP-, and MLLM-based baselines with matching or reduced computational cost.

In abdominal CT imaging, developing a low-dose, no-reference image quality assessment (No-reference IQA) model that mimics doctors' reading habits for evaluating CT image quality has significant practical value. This paper proposes a novel deep learning-based framework, ClinReadNet, whose design aligns with the clinical reading logic of radiologists: first, it introduces the Sobel ordinal quality network (SOQN) module, which can simultaneously focus on edge details highly relevant to image quality and the quality distribution pattern of the entire image, accurately matching the clinical image-reading judgment habit of "considering both local details and overall context"; second, the framework integrates the (shifted) window multi-scale temperature multi-head self-attention ((S)W-MTMSA) module, which further replicates the radiologists' image-reading process of shifting from overall scanning to local focusing, and accurately locks in regions of interest through multi-sharpness attention; third, it designs the hierarchical ranked probability score (HRPS) loss function, which combines the dual logics of coarse classification and fine classification, while paying attention to the distance information between grading labels, effectively improving the performance of image quality assessment. Experiments conducted on the LDCTIQAG2023 dataset show that the proposed method achieves the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance: the values of Pearson's linear correlation coefficient (PLCC), Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient (SROCC), and Kendall's rank-order correlation coefficient (KROCC) reach 0.9507, 0.9554, and 0.8629 respectively, with the sum of their absolute values (Score) being 2.7690, outperforming existing methods.

Comparing CT reconstruction methods fairly is labor-intensive and largely manual, and many benchmarks use idealized data. We ask whether a large language model (LLM) agent can do the labor of reconstruction research on its own, and whether a ranking measured on ideal data predicts behavior under realistic noise. We built an agentic loop: the agent edits a solver, runs a short cluster job, reads one frozen metric, and revises. The metric is a calibrated headroom score against the FBP baseline, inside the field of view; every method shares the same differentiable fan-beam projector. We benchmarked 26 methods on Mayo low-dose CT (noise-limited) and a 128-view sparse-view breast task from the noiseless DL-Sparse-View Challenge, with validation-selected iterations scored on a held-out test set. Every trained breast model was then re-scored on noisy inputs (I_0 = 10^5 photons) without retraining, and separately retrained on matched noise. The agent independently implemented, tuned, and benchmarked all 26 methods, and recombined them into a compact solver of 969 parameters that ties the top Mayo tier at the 1% level using 0.4% of the champion's parameters. Benchmarking gives a tier of statistically indistinguishable top methods, not one winner. Mild input noise nearly inverts the breast ranking: the noiseless champion (a supervised image denoiser, hr 0.89) collapses to 0.00, while a learned primal-dual method rises to champion (0.72 to 0.93). An ideal-data leaderboard therefore does not predict robustness. The inversion is a transfer effect, not a permanent deficit: retraining on matched noise restores much of the clean ranking (Spearman rho 0.04 to 0.61). Noise is only the easiest confounder in an open-ended set (beam hardening, scatter, anatomy, disease), so no single-factor challenge certifies generality. Benchmarks should model a broad spectrum of realistic factors at once.