In abdominal CT imaging, developing a low-dose, no-reference image quality assessment (No-reference IQA) model that mimics doctors' reading habits for evaluating CT image quality has significant practical value. This paper proposes a novel deep learning-based framework, ClinReadNet, whose design aligns with the clinical reading logic of radiologists: first, it introduces the Sobel ordinal quality network (SOQN) module, which can simultaneously focus on edge details highly relevant to image quality and the quality distribution pattern of the entire image, accurately matching the clinical image-reading judgment habit of "considering both local details and overall context"; second, the framework integrates the (shifted) window multi-scale temperature multi-head self-attention ((S)W-MTMSA) module, which further replicates the radiologists' image-reading process of shifting from overall scanning to local focusing, and accurately locks in regions of interest through multi-sharpness attention; third, it designs the hierarchical ranked probability score (HRPS) loss function, which combines the dual logics of coarse classification and fine classification, while paying attention to the distance information between grading labels, effectively improving the performance of image quality assessment. Experiments conducted on the LDCTIQAG2023 dataset show that the proposed method achieves the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance: the values of Pearson's linear correlation coefficient (PLCC), Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient (SROCC), and Kendall's rank-order correlation coefficient (KROCC) reach 0.9507, 0.9554, and 0.8629 respectively, with the sum of their absolute values (Score) being 2.7690, outperforming existing methods.
Medical image quality plays a critical role in diagnostic accuracy, especially in X-ray-based imaging modalities such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), where image quality must be balanced against radiation dose. While expert visual evaluation remains the clinical standard for image quality evaluation, it is time-consuming, subjective and affected by inter-observer variability, emphasizing the need for reliable quantitative image quality assessment (IQA) methods. However, the development and validation of such IQA methods have been limited by the lack of publicly available CBCT datasets with expert image quality annotations. In this study, we provide the first open-access CBCT IQA dataset containing 1,764 annotated image slices acquired using systematic variations in image acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Three clinical experts graded the overall image quality and a predefined regions of interest (ROI) using a four-level scoring scheme. In addition, we benchmark 26 full reference- and no reference-based IQA measures against expert annotations and introduce an exploratory IQA measure-based ranking capable of distinguishing subtle image quality differences. This dataset introduced a standardized benchmark for future CBCT IQA research and provides a valuable resource for the development and validation of new IQA methods, enabling reproducible research and advancing CBCT IQA.
Sepideh Hatamikia, Anna Breger, Clemens Karner +14
With the development of deep learning, medical image processing has been widely used to assist clinical research. This paper focuses on the denoising problem of low-dose computed tomography using deep learning. Although low-dose computed tomography reduces radiation exposure to patients, it also introduces more noise, which may interfere with visual interpretation by physicians and affect diagnostic results. To address this problem, inspired by Cycle-GAN for unsupervised learning, this paper proposes an end-to-end unsupervised low-dose computed tomography denoising framework. The proposed framework combines a U-Net structure for multi-scale feature extraction, an attention mechanism for feature fusion, and a residual network for feature transformation. It also introduces perceptual loss to improve the network for the characteristics of medical images. In addition, we construct a real low-dose computed tomography dataset and design a large number of comparative experiments to validate the proposed method, using both image-based evaluation metrics and medical evaluation criteria. Compared with classical methods, the main advantage of this paper is that it addresses the limitation that real clinical data cannot be directly used for supervised learning, while still achieving excellent performance. The experimental results are also professionally evaluated by imaging physicians and meet clinical needs.
Portable CT scanners may support earlier stroke assessment, but reduced photon counts introduce noise that affects image quality and may alter automated classification. We compared direct classification of simulated low-dose slices with residual U-Net denoising followed by the same fixed classifier. Poisson noise was generated at photon-count scaling factors of 1, 5, 10, 20, and 40 using three deterministic seeds. The held-out set contained 809 slices, including 242 positive and 567 negative slices. Direct classification reached its highest mean ROC-AUC at a scaling factor of 20 (0.937 +/- 0.002). Denoising followed by classification reached 0.842 +/- 0.005 at a scaling factor of 1 and declined to 0.655 +/- 0.002 at a scaling factor of 40. Meanwhile, reconstruction quality rose steadily from 21.92 to 40.91 dB PSNR and from 0.761 to 0.987 SSIM. Both pathways had poor sensitivity at a fixed 0.5 cutoff because their classification scores were concentrated near zero. Patient-level analysis was limited by the test-set composition: all 10 patients were positive under the mask-derived patient label, preventing estimation of patient-level AUC and specificity. Overall, higher reconstruction fidelity did not translate into better discrimination by the fixed classifier except at the lowest photon-count setting.