Signal-Noise Factorization Isolates Nuisance Variation into Removable Subspaces

Noise injection is a well-known technique in stochastic optimization. We report its surprising effectiveness with an interleaved (on-off-on-off...) rather than the usual monotonic decay schedule. We present a theoretical analysis of noise injection, which confirms that corruption by impulse noise approximates a Jacobian regularization, whereas Gaussian noise acts as a curvature penalty. This regularization behavior has been invoked to explain why noise injection increases model robustness. But the interleaved nature of our proposed schedule produces superior results even for the optimization objective: mixing phases of noisy data permits the optimizer to escape local minima and increase exploration without the risk of catastrophically forgetting the important features from the clean data. To stabilize this training scheme against the rapid changes of the loss when switching between clean and noisy data, we introduce a gradient-norm stabilization technique that scales noisy updates based on clean gradient magnitudes. We compare this method with other common augmentation methods and find substantial improvements in corruption tolerance and robustness to real-world distribution shifts on CIFAR-100-C, ImageNet-C, and ImageNet-R for ResNet and ViT architectures, with the best results being achieved by stacking our method on top of other augmentations. Through saliency and attention maps we show that the effect of interleaved noise injection stems from penalizing the failure modes encouraged by the inductive bias of the models: impulse noise works against the locality bias of convolutional (ResNet) architectures, and Gaussian noise reduces the tendency of attention-based models to pick up large-scale spurious features. Interleaved noise injection is therefore an effective tool to improve the test performance on clean, noisy, and out-of-distribution data at essentially zero computational cost.

Deep neural networks (DNNs) experience significant performance degradation when processing noisy labels, primarily due to overfitting on mislabeled data. Current mainstream approaches attempt to mitigate this issue by passively filtering clean samples during training. However, simple sample filtering within feature spaces degraded by noise struggles to distinguish between challenging samples and noisy samples, creating a bottleneck for model performance. We highlight for the first time the fundamental importance of actively reshaping feature space geometry for learning from noisy data. We propose a novel Geometry-aware Manifold Regularization Paradigm whose core idea is to explicitly construct energy barriers between data manifolds by actively synthesizing virtual outlier samples. By imposing geometric constraints that promote intra-class compactness and inter-class separation, this approach enhances the discriminability between hard and noisy samples, leading to the learning of more robust representations. Our regularization mechanism exhibits high universality, with effectiveness independent of any prior assumptions about noise patterns. It can be integrated as a standalone mechanism into existing sample selection frameworks, providing stronger robustness against diverse noisy environments. Experiments demonstrate that our paradigm achieves performance surpassing current state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods on multiple benchmarks, including CIFAR-10, with particularly pronounced advantages under more challenging asymmetric noise conditions. Furthermore, this paradigm significantly enhances the model's capability in Out-of-Distribution (OOD) detection, ensuring superior reliability and safety for deployment in open-world scenarios.

We present a large-scale empirical study isolating the contributions of the Derivative Regularization penalty (DREG). Across a fully-crossed factorial sweep of 960 experiments spanning 4 activations, 6 regularizers, 8 datasets, and 5 random seeds, we ask: when, where, and why does DREG work? Our results establish three principal findings. First, DREG achieves the highest overall and clean-regime accuracy among all regularizers evaluated (significantly so against the unregularized baseline, Weight Decay, and IGPen; Wilcoxon $p \leq 0.031$). It ranks second in noise robustness behind Spectral Normalization (SN) - the only two layer-wise regularizers in the study. Second, DREG is globally the best-performing regularizer under GELU, the default activation in modern transformer architectures, particularly on both messy vision and messy NLP benchmarks, suggesting direct applicability to frontier deep learning settings. Third, DREG's advantage over competing regularizers is most pronounced under data scarcity, consistent with its role as a geometric inductive bias that substitutes for the regularizing effect of data volume. Throughout, DREG is applied with a single fixed hyperparameter $λ= 10^{-2.5}$ and no per-dataset tuning, supporting its characterization as a plug-and-play regularizer for neural networks with nontrivial Jacobian structure. These findings are consistent with DREG's design: concentrating regularization pressure on layers where the activation derivative is largest, rather than constraining the network uniformly.