SHAMS: An Audio-Grounded Pronunciation Benchmark for Levantine Arabic

Arabic speech technology has largely focused on Modern Standard Arabic, leaving the living dialects spoken by hundreds of millions under-served. We introduce ALMIEYAR, a culturally grounded ASR benchmark covering 17 Arabic dialects across six families, built entirely from newly recorded speech unseen by existing models. Dialect-community coordinators selected culturally relevant images across 10 topics, and native speakers described them through five structured scenarios, yielding approximately 50 minutes per dialect (13.7 hours total). We benchmark 12 state-of-the-art ASR systems zero-shot, including GPT-4o-transcribe, Voxtral-Mini-4B, Fanar-STT-LF, Whisper, SeamlessM4T-v2, and wav2vec2-based models. GPT-4o-transcribe achieves the lowest overall WER at 35.0%, followed by Voxtral-Mini-4B, Fanar-STT-LF, and Whisper-Large-v3 at 41.1%, 45.9%, and 49.5%, respectively, indicating substantial remaining errors across Arabic dialect communities. Performance varies considerably across dialect groups, with no model performing uniformly best across all groups. WER alone also obscures dialectal ASR behaviour: wav2vec2-based models show large WER/CER gaps, where character-level agreement remains much higher than word-level accuracy, motivating joint WER/CER reporting. ALMIEYAR provides a unified benchmark for culturally grounded Arabic ASR evaluation, including the first published benchmark for Ahwazi Arabic.

We present Cardamom, a micro-dialectal Arabic speech dataset designed to support fine-grained evaluation and adaptation of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. Community-curated by native speakers familiar with the represented varieties, Cardamom contains approximately 40 hours of transcribed YouTube speech spanning 21 micro-dialects across Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Mauritania, Palestine, and Saudi Arabia. Each segment is annotated with one or more operational micro-dialect labels, code-switching information, and utterance-level perceived gender, enabling analysis of sub-country variation that is obscured by conventional country-level labels. We describe the collection and annotation process, motivate the micro-dialect inventory linguistically, and benchmark four multilingual ASR systems in zero-shot and adapted settings. The strongest zero-shot system obtains 43.47% aggregate WER, with particularly high error rates on Mauritanian and Lebanese varieties; adaptation on Cardamom reduces its WER to 35.21%. Audio-based identification experiments further show that the annotations provide a learnable prediction target, with a dedicated classifier reaching 85.57% accuracy on 21-way micro-dialect identification. Cardamom provides a resource for studying localized dialectal variation and developing Arabic speech systems with broader regional coverage.

While different stakeholders are trying to leverage Arabic Language Models (ALMs), safety alignment in ALMs remains largely underexplored, hindering their mainstream adoption. Existing safety benchmarks are predominantly English-centric and evaluate Arabic only in its standardized form, obscuring fine-grained safety vulnerabilities in Arabic NLP systems. This paper introduces SalamahBench, a unified benchmark of 8{,}270 human-verified harmful prompts across ML Commons hazard categories, each rendered in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and five regional Arabic varieties, namely Egyptian, Syrian, Saudi, Lebanese, and Moroccan, for a total of 49{,}620 paired instances. To analyze the resulting data, we introduce two complementary metrics, namely Dialect Shift, which measures a model's aggregate change in safety under dialectal reformulation, and Category-Specific Dialect Deviation, which isolates harm categories whose change departs from that aggregate trend. Evaluating models such as Fanar 2, ALLaM 2, and Karnak 1 under multiple safeguard configurations, we find that cross-variety robustness is strongly model dependent, and that aggregate scores can conceal category-level divergence. Our findings highlight the necessity of evaluating Arabic model safety jointly across linguistic varieties and harm domains rather than relying on aggregate scores or MSA alone.