Budgeted Cache Repair for Cross-Context KV-Cache Reuse

Cross-request KV caching reduces the prefill cost of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), but conventional prefix caching severely limits cache reuse across requests. Position-Independent Caching (PIC) removes this constraint by reusing independent chunks, but their KV states miss cross-chunk interactions. Existing methods selectively recompute token states to recover these missing interactions, but primarily allocate the recomputation budget to selecting which states to recompute, while fixing the recomputation context to the full causal prefix. We introduce RelaxKV, which formulates selective cache repair as a joint allocation problem over repair targets and recomputation context. Guided by the user query, RelaxKV identifies layer-specific repair targets and restricts their recomputation to a query-relevant context, reducing attention computation. Across four decoder models, RelaxKV at a 15% anchor ratio improves aggregate LongBench performance over ProphetKV on all models. On Qwen3-14B, RelaxKV provides a stronger quality-TTFT trade-off than ProphetKV across a 5%-30% anchor-ratio sweep, and achieves the best selective results on RULER-MV and LV-Eval at 16K and 32K context lengths. Controlled ablations further demonstrate the importance of recomputation context selection.

Reusing key-value (KV) caches speeds up LLM inference by avoiding repeated computation on shared text. Standard prefix caching reuses a KV cache only when the LLM is the same and all preceding text is identical, but real workloads often break both conditions: RAG systems place different documents before the same one, agents with different system prompts read the same file or tool output, multi-agent workflows use specialized LLMs on shared material, and an updated model reads documents cached by its previous version. Because KV caches depend on both the preceding text and the model weights, direct reuse can reduce answer quality. Many methods repair or compress the reused cache, but each paper uses its own tasks, models, and cost measures, and existing benchmarks mainly test long-context processing or reuse of an unchanged prefix. We introduce KVShareArena, a benchmark and open evaluation framework for comparing them under the same conditions. KVShareArena has (1) reuse tests on 2,150 questions from three QA datasets, where the preceding text, the cache-writing LLM, or both change while the answering LLM and input stay fixed; (2) five dense and mixture-of-experts LLMs (4B-30B) and six LLM pairs where one version of an LLM reads caches written by another, for 33 model-dataset settings; (3) 11 repair and compression methods from six method classes; (4) four evaluation perspectives: answer quality, prefill computation, KV-cache memory, and latency; and (5) a common interface for adding new methods and an interactive leaderboard. Experiments yield two findings. First, both the quality loss from reuse and which repairs help depend on the LLM, even between two 8B models. Second, most repairs keep their quality when another LLM version wrote the cache, but a trained repair adapter loses quality in 12 of 18 pair-dataset tests. Code and data: https://github.com/xishi404/KVShare-Arena

Many key-value (KV) caches are compressed before anyone knows what will be asked of them: a document cached for retrieval, a prompt prefix shared across requests, the memory of a long conversation. The prevailing approach scores KV entries by rehearsal: the model rereads the context and keeps the entries it attends to, assuming that the more completely a cache rehearses its context, the better it remembers it. We show that under tight budgets this assumption backfires: rehearse everything, remember nothing. At a 3% keep ratio, rereading the whole context keeps 31.5 of 96.5 points on RULER, and on LongBench's natural-text tasks it falls below methods that rehearse nothing at all. The cause is that a cache keeps what it rehearses: rereading spreads the budget across the whole context, so the answer's own entries survive at little more than chance. Like a student before an exam, a cache remembers more by testing itself than by rereading. Two principles follow: rehearse what will be read, and rehearse as much as there is. We instantiate them as Attic-KV (Attic for short), a training-free rehearsal in which the model quizzes itself with question-answer pairs that quote the context, alongside anchor tokens in a content-adaptive amount. Changing only the rehearsal lifts three hosts that score it in three different ways: Attic alone is the best training-free method in all eight settings we test on RULER and LongBench's natural-text tasks, and plugged into the gradient-based KVgrad and the trained RestoreKV+, it raises them by up to 17.1 and 28.1 points. Its advantage grows as the budget shrinks, reaching 41.9 points over full rereading at a 3% keep ratio, and it compresses faster than rereading the whole context.