Capturing Dynamics: The 4D Facial Expression Intensity Dataset
Authors: Zesheng Wang, Alexandre Bruckert, Pierre Lebreton, Patrick Le Callet, Yante Li, Guoying Zhao
Organizations: École Centrale Nantes, CNRS, LS2N, UMR 6004 Nantes Université, France · Center for Machine Vision and Signal Analysis University of Oulu, Finland
The estimation and analysis of facial expression intensity play a crucial role in affective communication and human-computer interaction. Previous research has primarily focused on detecting and estimating facial expression intensity from frame-level 2D representations. However, this limitation restricts a comprehensive understanding of real-world facial expressions, as they are inherently 3D and temporally continuous. This paper investigates the perception of facial expression intensity by introducing the 4D Facial Expression Intensity Dataset (4DFEID). We employ a parametric face model and compile a total of 2,869 mesh sequences with controlled geometric variations, generating 4D data instances with diverse peak intensities and identity attributes. Using a Likert scale, we collect more than 90,000 subjective intensity perception ratings via a crowdsourcing platform. We explore various architectures and aggregation methods to establish baselines for episode intensity estimation on the new dataset, revealing that spatial-temporal graph models consistently outperform traditional frame-aggregation methods. In contrast to existing datasets that rely on 2D static imagery, the proposed 4D-FEID dataset provides the community with a unique and vital resource for investigating the perception of facial expression intensity through the use of dynamic 3D stimuli. By offering high-fidelity, spatio-temporally coherent facial data, 4D-FEID establishes a new foundation for research into more nuanced and naturalistic expression analysis, thereby addressing a gap in the current landscape of affective computing and human-computer interaction studies. The dataset is available at link.
Figures & tables
Dataset
Modality
Granularity
Intensity Type
MultiEmoVA [ 16 ]
2D
Frame-level
Arousal
HAPPEI [ 6 ]
2D
Frame-level
Happiness
DISFA [ 15 ]
2D
Frame-level
AUs-based
BP4D [ 25 ]
4D
Frame-level
AUs-based
4DME [ 13 ]
4D
Sequence-level
None (Categorical)
4D-FEID (Ours)
4D
Sequence-level
Global Expression
TABLE I: The previous expression-intensity and 4D-expression datasets
Fig. 1: Example of intensity-based pruning on a sample sequence from the dataset. Each colored curve corresponds to one of the preserved expression-parameter dimensions.
Fig. 2: Examples of rendering outputs, displaying peak-frame results of various facial expressions under progressively increasing intensities. The overlaid heatmaps qualitatively verify that the expression intensity strengthens from left to right.
Fig. 3: Interface of subjective experiment.
Session
Reliability(ICC)
Session
Reliability(ICC)
1
0.97
8
0.97
2
0.97
9
0.98
3
0.98
10
0.97
4
0.98
11
0.97
5
0.97
12
0.97
6
0.97
13
0.97
TABLE II: Inter-observer consistency measured by ICC for each session.
Model
MAE ↓
ICC ↑
PCC ↑
CCC ↑
FLAME-based
0.192
0.946
0.946
0.943
Video-CNN
0.289
0.960
0.960
0.911
4D-Vertex
0.139
0.975
0.975
0.974
TABLE III: Test-set performance of the baseline methods in the standard set. Symbols ↑ and ↓ indicate that higher and lower values are better, respectively.
Model
MAE ↓
ICC ↑
PCC ↑
CCC ↑
FLAME-based
0.204
0.942
0.942
0.939
Video-CNN
0.282
0.962
0.961
0.917
4D-Vertex
0.146
0.973
0.973
0.970
TABLE IV: Test-set performance of the baseline methods in the cross-identity set. Symbols ↑ and ↓ indicate that higher and lower values are better, respectively.