Query-aware routing for Cross-lingual performance gains in Encoders

Multilingual dense retrievers place all languages in one shared space so that a question finds relevant documents, regardless of which language they are written in. We show that the same question, asked in different languages, retrieves substantially different documents, and this disagreement is not because of weak language understanding. Each language performs well on its own and ranks candidates consistently with the other languages; divergence appears only when languages share an index. We trace the mechanism: each language keeps its own ranking, but in the shared index, its correct answers are pushed far down, buried under non-relevant documents that are either in the query's own language or in English, depending on the model. We introduce disagreement-guided steering: for each language, we contrast the documents that other languages agree on for a question against those that language retrieves idiosyncratically, and take the difference of their representations as a language-specific direction, added to that language's queries at inference. Against baselines of language-mean removal, subspace removal, and per-language rotation, it most strongly reduces same-language crowding while remaining competitive on recall, trading off against mean removal, which better preserves ranking quality.

While mixed-language querying is ubiquitous in multilingual communities, the sensitivity of dense retrievers to such queries remains poorly understood. We present a ratio-controlled study on mMARCO that systematically evaluates retrieval performance by varying the mixing proportion of parallel query translations via embedding-level mixing -- constructing mixed queries as an interpolation of monolingual embeddings. Experiments with BGE-M3 demonstrate that an optimal mixing ratio outperforms the best monolingual endpoint in 88/105 cases. We uncover a distinct asymmetry driven by English dominance: mixing is uniformly beneficial when retrieving from non-English document indices, whereas indices containing English are best served by pure English queries. Furthermore, English acts as the strongest mixing partner for every non-English document language. Finally, when controlling for English dominance, mixing gains correlate negatively with typological distance. We conclude that language-mix sensitivity is structured and predictable, and we validate the robustness of these patterns across model families and scales.

Multilingual retrieval increasingly underpins cross-lingual question answering and retrieval-augmented generation. Strong zero-shot scores on multilingual benchmarks are often taken as evidence that current encoders transfer reliably across many languages. We argue that this assumption breaks down for underrepresented, morphologically rich languages, and use Amharic as a diagnostic case. Under a shared passage retrieval protocol covering dense, late-interaction, learned sparse, and cross-encoder paradigms, we compare zero-shot multilingual retrievers, Amharic-fine-tuned multilingual retrievers, and monolingual Amharic retrievers. The strongest zero-shot multilingual retriever underperforms the strongest monolingual Amharic first-stage retriever by 23% relative MRR@10. Fine-tuning two recent multilingual embedding models on the same Amharic supervision yields 32-60% relative MRR@10 gains over zero-shot, but the best Amharic-fine-tuned multilingual model remains below the strongest monolingual Amharic retriever. These findings indicate that zero-shot multilingual retrieval is not a sufficient proxy for equitable information access in the LLM era: for underrepresented languages, retrieval must be evaluated and adapted in-language rather than inferred from aggregate multilingual benchmarks. To foster future research, we publicly release the dataset, codebase, and trained models at https://github.com/rasyosef/amharic-neural-ir.