cs.CROct 2, 2026

SecJev: Bringing Security Expertise to System One Decision Models

Authors: Zheng Chen, Fei Yu, Haohao Huang, Yang Li, Anlong Chen, Lei Chen

Organizations: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · National Key Laboratory of Security Communication

Abstract

Security workflows need models that turn complex observations and explicit policies into decisions. System One models introduced by Jev return typed predictions and probabilities; security specialization supplies the domain expertise behind those predictions. We introduce SecJev, to our knowledge the first family of Jev-style decision models specialized for security, spanning 0.8B to 9B parameters. Built on Kev's single-pass candidate scorer, SecJev learns Boolean, choice, and ordered decisions from text, telemetry, and observation histories. We develop SecJev-Corpus to unify source-label prediction and explicit-policy evaluation across 14 tasks and eight sources. It covers tool outputs, traffic, federated updates, consensus, authentication, and vehicle messages. Scene-weighted training adapts the models across these domains while preserving a shared typed decision interface. Security specialization improves every model in the family; SecJev-0.8B outperforms general Kev-9B by 20.51 percentage points in task-macro accuracy. At 0.8B and 4B, SecJev achieves accuracy and latency close to answer-only generative fine-tuning with lower peak allocated GPU memory. SecJev-4B improves on Kev-4B and security-trained generation in prompt-injection and traffic transfer tests. We release adapters, decision heads, SecJev-Corpus, and training and inference code.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables11 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Sep 27, 2026

Evaluating System One Models for Agent Security Decisions: Reliability, Calibration, and Selective Automation

Agentic software connects language models to tools that modify files and interact with external services. Developers use model-based security checks to screen external content and user requests before agents act. System One models answer developer-defined questions with probabilities over predefined answers such as safe or unsafe, but classification accuracy alone does not establish whether these probabilities support reliable automation. We evaluate Jev, Laya, Decider, and Bespoke Nimble against specialized classifiers and language-model judges across prompt-injection detection, interaction-risk judgment, and harmful-request screening, examining decision accuracy, calibration, and selective automation. (1) High overall accuracy and low average calibration error can conceal attacks classified as safe with high confidence within particular groups. Developers should test candidate models on the intended security task and examine errors within relevant attack groups. (2) Policies selected under strict miss limits allow few test inputs automatically, and choosing allow and block thresholds separately increases automation mainly through additional blocks. Developers should verify limits on missed unsafe inputs and blocked benign inputs on independent data, and report the allowed and blocked fractions separately. (3) Comparing predictions on the same inputs shows that a language-model judge can detect unsafe inputs missed by a System One model, but can also repeat the System One model's confident mistakes and falsely flag benign inputs. Developers should test which missed unsafe inputs their review rule forwards, then measure the review model's misses and benign false alarms on those inputs.
Sep 29, 2026

Evaluating and Benchmarking the System One Model Jev

Jev is a commercial System One model from TypeSafe AI that does not generate text: given a state and typed questions, it returns a choice from fixed options, a position on a rubric, or the probability that a statement is true, with probabilities the vendor describes as calibrated. Such models target small decisions in information access pipelines, such as routing queries, checking grounding, moderating content, or rating against a rubric. We evaluate Jev (jev-1.13.0) zero-shot on 37 datasets spanning classification, routing, natural language inference, reading comprehension, commonsense reasoning, moderation, legal clause analysis and rubric scoring, with one frozen template per dataset and full evaluation splits: 346,009 requests for under USD 10. For reference, we score Qwen3.8-27B and Gemma-4-E4B on identical requests via their exact next-token probabilities over the options. Jev reaches 95-99% accuracy on IMDB, SST-2, HellaSwag and ARC and 86.7% on Belebele across 122 languages. It beats Qwen on 27 of 37 datasets, with none of Qwen's nine leads outside the bootstrap intervals, and Gemma on all 37. All three models degrade on low-resource languages, fine-grained or noisy labels, and rubric-based quality judgments. Jev's choice probabilities are well calibrated and support selective prediction. Binary probabilities rank well but are poorly placed relative to a fixed 0.5 threshold; thresholds tuned on training data raise micro-F1 on UNFAIR-ToS from 0.50 to 0.75. Jev answers MMLU's calculation-heavy questions more accurately than other MMLU questions (94% vs. 91%), whereas both open models, and all three on C-Eval, find them harder. Rotating the options leaves Jev's accuracy unchanged and withholding the question drops it to near chance, ruling out shallow memorization but not memorized question-answer pairs. We release the code, harness and all raw responses.
Oct 24, 2026

Benchmarking System One Models for Time-Series Decision Making: A Case Study of Jev

Time-series tasks require both accurate predictions and fast decisions. Advances in large models have introduced decision-oriented models that directly output answers and their probabilities, which we call Structured System 1 models. Their applicability to time-series tasks remains underexplored. Using Jev 1.13.0 as a case study, we evaluate time-series classification, event type prediction, oil temperature direction and stock movement prediction, converting continuous forecasting targets into discrete decisions to fit the model interface. We establish a unified evaluation framework using accuracy and AUC. Results show stronger performance on selected explicit temporal patterns and event type prediction, but near-chance discrimination on many numerical sequence classification tasks and stock movement prediction. Some datasets also reveal a gap between ranking quality and final decision accuracy. These findings motivate improvements in temporal representation, domain adaptation, and decision-score alignment. Standardized sample construction, model calls, and result recording support extending the evaluation to future models.