cs.NEOct 2, 2026

The Investment Acceleration Principle Revisited by means of a Neural Network

Authors: Guido Fioretti

Organizations: Universität Stuttgart Institute for Theoretical Physics and Synergetics Stuttgart, Germany · International Centre for Economic Research Turin, Italy

Abstract

The investment acceleration principle is a heuristic for modelling investment time series out of consumption time series. The model presented herein develops a disaggregated accelerator equation whose coefficients are the weights of a Kohonen neural net that represents firms' decision-making. According to this model, investments take place when managers recognise emerging technological patterns. Furthermore, a technique borrowed from the theory of self-organising systems is used in order to disentangle innovation-driven investments from plant-replication investments.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Jun 27, 2026

FinInvest-GTCN: Explainable Graph-Temporal-Causal Modeling for Risk-Aware Investment Decision Optimization

Venture capital (VC) investment decisions face distinct challenges, such as multi-source heterogeneous data, non-stationary time series, and the demand for explainable predictions in high-stakes, low-data settings. To overcome these issues, we introduce FinInvest-GTCN, a Graph-Temporal-Causal Network that redefines the task from content recommendation to quantitative risk-return assessment. This architecture combines a relational graph encoder to capture the investment ecosystem's topology, a multi-scale temporal fusion module to handle long-term dependencies and non-stationarity, and a causal decision head that generates risk-adjusted predictions with interpretable causal attributions. A core innovation is the Meta-Causal Adaptation (MCA) strategy, which facilitates robust fine-tuning for new, data-scarce sectors by aligning updates with causally-plausible structures derived from meta-pretraining. Comprehensive experiments on proprietary VC datasets show that FinInvest-GTCN delivers state-of-the-art results, markedly lowering the primary Risk-Adjusted Mean Squared Error (RA-MSE) to 2.51 from a baseline of 3.05 and boosting the cumulative return of a simulated portfolio by 18.7%. Ablation studies underscore the essential role of each component, while additional analyses confirm the model's stability, interpretability, and enhanced adaptability. This work pioneers a data-driven, explainable framework for investment decision support.
Jan 20, 2024

Large and Deep Factor Models

We show that a deep neural network (DNN) trained to construct a stochastic discount factor (SDF) admits an additive decomposition separating nonlinear characteristic discovery from the pricing rule that aggregates them. This decomposition yields a linear factor representation governed by the Portfolio Tangent Kernel (PTK), which summarizes the network's learned features. In population, the implied SDF converges to a ridge-regularized version of the true SDF, with the degree of regularization determined by spectral complexity. Empirically, using U.S. equity data, the PTK representation delivers economically and statistically significant performance gains, while rising spectral complexity imposes tighter limits on finite-sample pricing.
Mar 3, 2026

Same Error, Different Function: The Optimizer as an Implicit Prior in Financial Time Series

Neural networks applied to financial time series operate in a regime of underspecification, where model predictors achieve indistinguishable out-of-sample error. Using large-scale volatility forecasting for S&\&P 500 stocks, we show that different model-training-pipeline pairs with identical test loss learn qualitatively different functions. Across architectures, predictive accuracy remains unchanged, yet optimizer choice reshapes non-linear response profiles and temporal dependence differently. These divergences have material consequences for decisions: volatility-ranked portfolios trace a near-vertical Sharpe-turnover frontier, with nearly 3×3\times turnover dispersion at comparable Sharpe ratios. We conclude that in underspecified settings, optimization acts as a consequential source of inductive bias, thus model evaluation should extend beyond scalar loss to encompass functional and decision-level implications.