cs.SDOct 2, 2026

DriftTTS: Few-Step Text-to-Speech Without Distillation via Distribution-Matching Drift

Authors: Mohammad Nur Hossain Khan, Subrata Biswas, Bashima Islam

Organizations: University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA · Worcester Polytechnic Institute, MA, USA

Abstract

Few-step neural text-to-speech models often rely on short- ened diffusion or flow-matching schedules, or on distillation from pretrained multi-step teachers. To avoid these depen- dencies, we present DriftTTS, a few-step mel-spectrogram generator trained without a generative teacher, distillation, or adversarial discrimination. DriftTTS uses a distribution- matching drift objective in a mel-domain feature space defined by raw mels and a frozen masked-autoencoder encoder pretrained on the same LJSpeech training split. On-policy rollout trains the decoder on its own interme- diate states and supports inference up to the trained roll- out depth. On LJSpeech, DriftTTS at NFE=4 achieves 3.87 dB MCD and 3.7% WER, compared with 3.85 dB and 3.4% for Matcha-TTS. In a fully paired blind listen- ing test, DriftTTS obtains 4.18 MOS, compared with 3.96 for Matcha-TTS and 4.22 for ground truth. These results demonstrate competitive few-step synthesis without a pre- trained generative teacher. Code can be found at https: //github.com/BASHLab/driftTTS.git

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Oct 16, 2026

DriftTTS: One-stage Single Step Text-to-Speech via Generative Drifting

Text-to-speech models built on score matching and flow matching produce natural speech, but only by calling the decoder many times, which makes synthesis slow. Existing ways to cut the number of calls either distill from a multi-step teacher or add a stage on top of a pretrained model, leaving single-step TTS without a pretrained TTS model unexplored. We question whether pretraining a TTS model is necessary, and propose DriftTTS, which adopts generative drifting, an objective that moves iterative sampling from inference into training. Drifting assumes samples of fixed shape, whereas speech has variable length; we address this issue with segment drifting. On LJSpeech, DriftTTS matches the multi-step quality of Matcha-TTS and RapFlow-TTS in a single decoder call, while being faster. To our knowledge, this is the first application of generative drifting to text-to-speech.
Sep 28, 2026

Distill Locally, Schedule Globally: Flow Maps for Few-Step Text-to-Speech

Flow-matching text-to-speech (TTS) models achieve high synthesis quality but require many neural function evaluations (NFEs) to integrate their generative trajectories. Recent few-step flow-map distillation approaches for TTS construct targets from numerically integrated teacher trajectories, creating a trade-off between target accuracy and training cost. We propose Local Flow-Map Distillation (LFMD), which adapts Eulerian Map Distillation to conditional TTS and avoids teacher trajectory integration during target construction. For inference, we derive a sampling schedule (TD-DP) from teacher dynamics and consistency of the learned maps, with a single cost graph supporting multiple NFE budgets without external audio-metric evaluation. Because scheduling offers no flexibility at one NFE, we refine this regime with alignment-aware temporal self-distillation using soft-DTW. Across Seed-TTS and LibriSpeech-PC, LFMD improves low-NFE synthesis over a matched integral-distillation baseline. On Seed-TTS, the refined student reaches 1.80% WER with 1-NFE, compared with 1.76% for its 32-NFE teacher.
Jul 7, 2026

Fréchet Distance Loss on Speech Representations for Text-to-Speech Synthesis

Few-step diffusion and flow-matching text-to-speech (TTS) models are usually trained with local objectives, such as conditional flow matching, reconstruction, and stop prediction. These losses provide stable optimization, but they never ask whether sampled speech follows the distribution of high-quality speech. We propose Speech Representation Fr'echet Distance loss (SR-FD), a training-time distributional regularizer for tokenizer-free flow-matching autoregressive TTS. During fine-tuning, the model synthesizes speech with the same few-step sampler used at deployment, and SR-FD matches the mean and covariance of frozen Whisper and CTC features of this speech to reference statistics computed offline from three complementary content targets. The loss requires no discriminator and no inference-time computation. On Seed-TTS English, four-step SR-FD fine-tuning reduces WER from the original four-step VoxCPM2 baseline's 2.2279% to 1.4147%, a 36.5% relative reduction, and also surpasses the original ten-step baseline at 1.7366%; both gains are significant under an utterance-level paired bootstrap. Speaker similarity and objective quality proxies are preserved at the ten-step level, and an error analysis shows the gain comes from content substitutions across all prompt lengths. SR-FD is thus an intelligibility-improving distributional regularizer for few-step TTS.