TS-SP: Learning Speaker-Preserving Representations in Audio Large Language Models
Authors: Junjie Li, Zheng Liang, Zhe Li, Tianchi Liu, Kong Aik Lee
Organizations: Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China · Speech, Language, and Cognition Laboratory, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China · National University of Singapore
Audio large language models (ALLMs) can understand speech content, yet their ability to use speaker identity for verification remains limited. We propose TS-SP (Two-Stage Speaker Preservation), a parameter-efficient framework for learning speaker-preserving representations and making them accessible to an ALLM's language-model component. We instantiate and evaluate TS-SP on Qwen2.5-Omni-7B. First, we adapt the audio encoder with speaker identity supervision. We then freeze the adapted encoder and train the language model to compare speakers. Both stages use low-rank adaptation (LoRA), keeping the pretrained base weights fixed. On Vox1-O, TS-SP reduces the equal error rate (EER) from 7.01% for the Paired Loss Adaptation Baseline to 4.37%. EER remains within 4.31--4.79% under unseen prompts. Cross-domain evaluation on CN-Celeb yields a similar EER to the baseline, but lower accuracy at the native decision threshold. These findings support two-stage adaptation for improving speaker verification on the evaluated backbone.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: TS-SP: Stage 1 learns audio LoRA with intermediate speaker supervision; Stage 2 freezes the adapted audio pathway and trains LM LoRA for speaker comparison. All pretrained base weights remain fixed.
System
Adaptation
EER (%)
minDCF
Target ACC (%)
Nontarget ACC (%)
Overall ACC (%)
IN-DOMAIN EVALUATION
Vox1-O
Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct [ 6 ]
Zero-shot
62.26
1.000
43.44
32.94
38.19
Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct [ 2 ]
Zero-shot
33.39
1.000
100.00
0.00
50.00
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B [ 23 ]
Zero-shot
32.03
1.000
60.99
72.55
66.77
Paired Loss Adaptation Baseline [ 16 ]
Fine-tuned
7.01
0.915
97.99
87.77
92.88
Table 1: SV results on Vox1-O/E/H and CN-Celeb. Only the Paired Loss Adaptation Baseline and TS-SP undergo task-specific fine-tuning (VoxCeleb2); other systems are evaluated zero-shot. CN-Celeb uses 348,430 trials (1,776 target, 346,654 nontarget), without domain adaptation. Lower EER/minDCF and higher ACC are better; ACC uses s=0 . Bold marks the best value per metric and trial list.
ID
Usage
Prompt supplied with the audio pair
Positive
Negative
EER (%)
minDCF
Target ACC (%)
Nontarget ACC (%)
P0
Train/test
Are these two audio segments spoken by the same speaker? Answer only Yes or No.
Yes
No
4.37
0.611
97.49
93.82
P1
Test only
Do these two audio segments belong to the same speaker? Respond only with Yes or No.
Yes
No
4.33
0.611
97.55
93.66
P2
Test only
The two audio segments were produced by the same speaker. Is this statement true or false? Answer only True or False.
True
False
4.39
0.671
97.15
94.33
P3
Test only
Compare the speakers in the two audio segments. Output 1 if they are the same speaker and 2 otherwise.
1
2
4.79
0.824
98.69
90.44
P4
Test only
Are the speakers in the two audio segments the same or different? Answer only Same or Different.
Same
Different
4.31
0.631
96.30
95.16
P5
Test only
这两段音频是否由同一个说话人说出?只回答“是”或“不是”。
是
不是
4.50
0.643
99.88
79.88
Table 2: Prompt-robustness results of TS-SP on the cleaned Vox1-O trial list. P0 is the only prompt used in Stage 2 training, while P1–P5 are unseen test-time prompts. Positive and negative verbalizers correspond to same-speaker and different-speaker trials, respectively. Target and nontarget accuracies use the native threshold sv=0 .
Speech-aware large language models (LLMs) can accept speech inputs, yet their training objectives largely emphasize linguistic content or specific fields such as emotions or the speaker's gender, leaving it unclear whether they encode speaker identity. First, we propose a model-agnostic scoring protocol that produces continuous verification scores for both API-only and open-weight models, using confidence scores or log-likelihood ratios from the Yes/No token probabilities. Using this protocol, we benchmark recent speech-aware LLMs and observe weak speaker discrimination (EERs above 20% on VoxCeleb1). Second, we introduce a lightweight augmentation that equips an LLM with ASV capability by injecting frozen ECAPA-TDNN speaker embeddings through a learned projection and training only LoRA adapters. On TinyLLaMA-1.1B, the resulting ECAPA-LLM achieves 1.03% EER on VoxCeleb1-E, approaching a dedicated speaker verification system while preserving a natural-language interface.
Thomas Thebaud, Yuzhe Wang, Laureano Moro-Velazquez +2
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA · Human Language Technology Center of Excellence, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Recent advances in text-to-speech and voice cloning make high-quality spoofing inexpensive and scalable, threatening voice authentication systems, especially automatic speaker verification (ASV). Existing defenses mainly address this threat through binary countermeasures (CMs) for deepfake detection or spoofing-aware speaker verification (SASV), where current systems are dominated by modular ASV-CM fusion and cascaded pipelines. Although large audio language models (LALMs) have shown promise on related audio tasks, including CM and ASV, their use for SASV remains unexplored, despite their capacity to produce natural-language rationales for auditing and robustness beyond discriminative predictions. This work systematically evaluates LALMs for SASV against conventional pipelines under zero-shot prompting, supervised adaptation, reasoning-oriented training, and reinforcement-learning-based optimization. Our results show that pretrained LALMs are near chance in the zero-shot setting, confirming that they are not natively suited to SASV, but that task-specific adaptation closes this gap. We further find that competitive SASV performance can be achieved through several distinct routes. These findings position LALMs as a promising and auditable foundation for unified SASV, while clarifying where conventional cascade systems still lead.
As audio-first agents become increasingly common in physical AI, conversational robots, and screenless wearables, audio large language models (audio-LLMs) must integrate speaker-specific understanding to support user authorization, personalization, and context-aware interaction. This requires modeling who is speaking, how the voice sounds, and how recording conditions affect speaker cues. Conventional speaker verification systems provide strong scalar scores but little linguistic evidence, while current audio-LLMs and speaker-aware language models have limited ability to organize speaker information beyond binary labels or descriptive profiles. We present SpeakerLLM, a speaker-specialized audio-LLM framework that unifies single-utterance speaker profiling, recording-condition understanding, utterance-pair speaker comparison, and evidence-organized verification reasoning within a natural-language interface. We construct verification-reasoning targets and a decision-composition policy that separate profile-level evidence from the final same-or-different decision and organize recording condition, profile evidence, and the decision into a structured trace. At its core, SpeakerLLM uses a hierarchical speaker tokenizer designed to capture multiple granularities of speaker evidence. Utterance-level speaker embeddings summarize identity and profile-level cues, whereas frame-level speaker features preserve fine-grained acoustic descriptors. Experiments show that SpeakerLLM-Base improves speaker-profile and recording-condition understanding over general audio-LLMs, while SpeakerLLM-VR preserves strong generated-verdict accuracy and produces decision traces grounded in the supervised verification reasoning schema. We will release the metadata-enriched supervision dataset and target-construction code for reproducibility.
KiHyun Nam, Jungwoo Heo, Siu Bae +2
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) · University of Seoul