Hamiltonian Metric Learning and Energy-Based Training: A Dissipative Geometric Framework for Optimization

Adaptive optimizers carry hidden states that change how visible gradients become parameter motion. We develop optimization geometrodynamics as a variational theory of this hidden geometry. Infimal pushforward eliminates all hidden states realizing the same action and composes across optimizer hierarchies. Under smooth nondegeneracy, it yields hidden susceptibility and the Schur-complement curvature seen after relaxation. For affine pre-reduction perturbations, the induced interaction curvature is the negative-semidefinite operator $-G^*H^{-1}G$, whose mixed entries integrate to finite mechanism contrasts. Our main realization is the determinant-one affine-invariant SPD action map $P\mapsto PA$. We prove a global analytic bundle with closed totally geodesic fibers and a unique analytic nearest-controller section. A strongly convex fiber theorem and an explicit logarithmic action residual give a globally linearly convergent solver from every feasible initializer, together with nonasymptotic value, controller-distance, and residual bounds and observable posterior stopping certificates. A conditional inexact result propagates supplied rigorous residual-error and radius majorants. The dense spectral kernel is confined to an active subspace of dimension $r\le 2m$, yielding an explicit spectral-arithmetic operation bound and a strict dimensional reduction when $r<d$. For nested shape-normalized quadratic actions, canonical multi-secant projections satisfy an exact CAT(0) Pythagorean decrease and recover the determinant-one inverse Hessian shape at the sharp rank threshold $d-1$, provided the scalar gauge $c_H=(\det H)^{1/d}$ is known. These results turn the action bundle into an exact iterative computation with posterior certificates and a finite-identification theory.

Hessian spectral properties are a standard tool in analysing neural-network training, with eigenvalues linked to sharpness, generalization, and optimization dynamics. Eigenvalues quantify curvature magnitude, while eigenvectors identify which parameters generate that curvature. In this work, we study how the leading Hessian eigenvectors evolve during training and how they affect the learning trajectories. We track the training dynamics of multilayer perceptrons on a classification problem and measure eigenvector dynamics through two complementary statistics: (i) displacement over time, inspired by analyses of glassy systems, and (ii) localization via the inverse participation ratio. The metrics are compared against a random null model of the Hessian induced by the architecture. Our results reveal clear optimizer-dependent behaviour. SGD leads to progressively more stable leading curvature directions, while Adam exhibits substantially stronger reorganization of eigenvectors throughout training. We also observe a localization phenomenon under Adam, where a small subset of parameters contributes disproportionately to the leading curvature directions. These results suggest that Hessian eigenvector dynamics capture key differences in optimizer behaviour and the resulting training trajectories.

The choice of Riemannian metric can strongly influence the convergence of gradient-based optimization over covariance matrices. Euclidean, Bures-Wasserstein and affine-invariant metrics are common choices, but their relative effectiveness depends on the objective. We introduce a two-parameter family defined by $X^{p}LX^{q}+X^{q}LX^{p}=U$, solved for $L$ at each tangent vector $U$, that contains all three as exact members, at $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(1,1)$, and extends past them. We treat the choice of member as a particular way of preconditioning for a given problem. To this end, we analyze the conditioning of the Riemannian Hessian at the solution. We show that it obeys a lower bound that depends on $(p,q)$ only through the exponent $r=p+q$. When the Euclidean Hessian is a pure power that mixes no eigendirections, the member $p=q=r/2$ attains that bound, and a closed-form criterion identifies the other members that do. We discuss ways to tune $r$ for a given problem. Experiments on real covariance data confirm the predicted conditioning and the benefit of tuning $r$. A task covariance example shows a further gain from tuning the shape.