Ensemble-Based Perceptual Audio Quality Assessment with Confidence Intervals

Mean opinion scores (MOS) are widely used for speech quality assessment, yet scalar labels are sensitive to rater variability and listening test differences. This introduces labeling noise, which limits the reliability of MOS prediction. Preference prediction reduces this variability as listeners compare signals directly, producing cleaner labels. We study MOS-free preference prediction and propose PrefSQA, which incorporates uncertainty-aware logits, an impairment attention head, and a module based on non-matching-reference comparisons. We use and refine five datasets, including MOS-derived and low-noise simulated sets with matching and non-matching content, experiment with human preference sets, and test on unseen data. Experiments show small improvements on MOS-derived data, while other sets reveal clear improvement over the baselines, highlighting the value of high-quality preference data and demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Audio-language models can produce confident answers unsupported by the audio, motivating uncertainty estimates that identify unreliable responses. We compare probability-based, sampling-based, self-verification, evidential, and contrastive measures across four open-weight models and five audio QA benchmarks. In multiple-choice evaluation, first-token measures are strongest overall, with top-1 probability achieving a mean AUROC of .740, compared with .708 for ten-sample discrete semantic entropy, while requiring no additional model calls. Across four benchmarks, shifting from multiple-choice to open-ended evaluation lowers mean accuracy from 57.6% to 36.6%, yet uncertainty remains predictive of errors: semantic entropy, maximum token entropy, and semantic agreement achieve mean AUROCs of .697, .694, and .693, respectively. To test whether uncertainty reflects the evidence available to answer the question, we perform input ablations that remove either the audio or the question. Across top-1 confidence, entropy, and sampling-based measures, removing audio reduces error-detection AUROC by .101 on average, compared with .010 when removing the question. Together, these results establish efficient uncertainty baselines and show that uncertainty in audio-language models depends substantially more on available audio evidence than on question text.

Audio-visual quality assessment (AVQA) is essential for streaming, teleconferencing, and immersive media. In realistic streaming scenarios, distortions are often asymmetric, where one modality may be severely degraded while the other remains clean. Still, most contemporary AVQA metrics treat audio and video as equally reliable, causing confidence-unaware fusion to emphasize unreliable signals. This paper proposes MCM-AVQA, a multimodal confidence-aware AVQA framework that explicitly estimates modality-specific confidence and injects it into a dedicated audio-visual mixer for cross-modal attention. The Audio-Visual Mixer utilizes frame-level, confidence-guided channel attention to gate fusion, modulating feature interaction between modalities so that high-confidence streams dominate while unreliable inputs are suppressed, preserving temporal degradation patterns. A multi-head visual confidence estimator turns frame-level artifact probabilities into temporally smoothed, clip-level visual confidence scores, while an audio confidence module derives confidence from speech-quality cues without requiring a clean reference. Experiments on multiple AVQA benchmarks show that MCM-AVQA, and specifically its confidence-guided Audio-Visual Mixer, improve correlation with human mean opinion scores and yield more interpretable behavior under real-world asymmetric audio-visual distortions.