Data Fusion for Errors-in-Variables

Huali Zhao; Molei Liu; Tianying Wang

stat.MLOct 5, 2026

Data Fusion for Errors-in-Variables

Authors: Huali Zhao, Molei Liu, Tianying Wang

Abstract

We study errors-in-variables problems in which a target study contains only a single error-prone surrogate of an unobserved exposure, while an external source study provides repeated surrogate measurements from a different population. The measurement error distribution is allowed to depend on the observed error-free variables, and the error-free variable distribution itself may differ between studies. We introduce a conditional transportability assumption that enables the use of external repeated measurements under source-target heterogeneity. Together with additional replicate-error conditions, it identifies the target conditional measurement-error distribution. Building on this identification result, we develop a data-fusion estimator for a broad class of target functionals. The estimator combines conditional deconvolution, flexible nuisance estimation, and orthogonal correction that reduces first-order sensitivity to nuisance estimation. For the proposed estimator, we develop a unified spectral theory covering both diffuse-spectrum and finite atomic-spectrum target functionals, derive a general asymptotic expansion, and establish consistency and target-specific convergence-rate bounds. The resulting convergence-rate bounds depend jointly on the spectral properties of the measurement error, the latent exposure, and the target functional. For finite atomic-spectrum targets, we further establish joint Gaussian and bootstrap limits, yielding inference for smooth moment transformations under an additional centering condition. In the reported simulations, Fuse-EIV has small bias for the primary exposure-related coefficient. Applications to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey illustrate how accounting for population heterogeneity and error heteroscedasticity can change empirical conclusions.

Explore similar work

Oct 8, 2026stat.ML

Prediction-Powered Data Fusion for Treatment Effect Estimation

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identify treatment effects without confounding but are often small, whereas observational studies (OBS) are large but may be confounded. Many estimators combining a small RCT with a large OBS have been developed for the average treatment effect (ATE) and the conditional ATE (CATE). However, existing ATE estimators either make assumptions on the OBS or do not borrow enough power from them. The CATE has been studied less than the ATE. Existing CATE methods either assume the OBS are unconfounded, rely on a model of the confounding function, or accept bias in exchange for lower variance. We therefore propose a framework that, without special assumptions on the OBS, fuses the OBS and the RCT by preserving the unbiasedness of RCT-based estimation while borrowing power from the large OBS to boost precision. Applying this principle, we build an ATE estimator, AIPW-Fusion, with closed-form weights and confidence intervals, and two CATE learners, DR-Fusion and R-Fusion. Experiments corroborate our findings.

Yonghan Jung, Shu Yang

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · North Carolina State University

Causal Effect Estimation Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation Prediction-Powered Inference

Ask PDF

Aug 30, 2026cs.AI

When Prediction Error Is Not Enough: Evaluating Nuisance-Function Prediction for Causal Estimation

Prediction error is widely used to evaluate nuisance-function estimators in causal inference, but its relationship with causal estimator performance may differ across performance measures. We studied this question in a partially linear model using Monte Carlo simulations. We compared ordinary least squares (OLS), generalized additive models (GAMs), XGBoost, and Double Machine Learning with XGBoost (DML-XGBoost), evaluating nuisance-function prediction error, bias, RMSE, and 95% confidence interval coverage. We also examined a simple joint-error measure based on the absolute cross-product of estimation errors from the exposure and outcome nuisance functions. Across the simulated settings, XGBoost had the lowest RMSE among the non-oracle methods, while DML-XGBoost generally provided better confidence interval coverage. Prediction error did not consistently track causal bias across methods and settings, and the method with the best point-estimation performance did not necessarily have the best confidence interval coverage. The joint-error measure was only weakly associated with causal bias and did not provide a useful standalone measure of causal performance. These results suggest that prediction error is useful for assessing nuisance-function estimation, but it should not be treated as a direct measure of the quality of the resulting causal estimator.

Cong Cao

Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA

Semiparametric Inference Causal Effect Estimation Debiased ML

Ask PDF

Jul 30, 2026stat.ML

Doubly Robust Functional Representation Learning for Longitudinal Causal Inference with Irregular Histories

Longitudinal causal studies often record histories as irregular functional fragments: laboratory values, physiologic signals, sensor streams, and image-derived summaries measured at unequal and informative times. Standard doubly robust estimators usually require scalar summaries, whereas sequence learners optimize prediction losses that need not stabilize the efficient influence function. We propose Doubly Robust Functional Representation Learning (DR-FRL), a cross-fitted workflow that turns irregular histories into estimand-targeted states for observed-history regimes. Functional and temporal encoders map point clouds and prior histories into states; nuisance heads estimate outcome, treatment, and censoring functions; and EIF-targeted validation, calibration, overlap, tail, and ablation diagnostics assess whether the state supports the estimating equation. If the selected state preserves the nuisance information needed by the EIF, representation error enters the same second-order product remainder as ordinary nuisance error, and the mean estimator is asymptotically linear under explicit rate, overlap, calibration, and stability conditions. Catoni aggregation is treated separately as a bounded-influence point estimator, not a replacement for Wald inference. Simulations show gains when functional confounding is high-dimensional, measurement is informative, support is weak, or pseudo-outcomes are heavy-tailed. A VitalDB audit shows that DR-FRL can use irregular laboratory point clouds and deliver a useful negative finding: for this ICU-disposition endpoint, scalar laboratory summaries already carry much endpoint-relevant information.

Mengfei Ran, Yifeng Shen, Ruijie Guan

Academy of Life and Natural Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China · Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Causal Representation Learning Causal Inference Doubly Robust Estimation

Ask PDF