cs.AIOct 5, 2026

CuratorMAS: Automating Dataset Curation via Multi-Agent Orchestration

Authors: Yixin Zhang, Wenjie Feng

Abstract

High-quality datasets are essential for reliable machine learning, but dataset curation remains costly and hard to generalize across domains. Existing methods typically rely on manually designed heuristics or model-dependent signals, limiting their applicability across tasks and user queries. To address these limitations and automate data curation, we propose \textbf{CuratorMAS}, a multi-agent collaboration framework that orchestrates agents to evaluate and curate high-quality datasets. To achieve the goal of flexible curation, CuratorMAS decomposes the complex curation process into five programmable execution stages and forms a parallelizable workflow. Specifically, CuratorMAS first performs dataset exploration to collect contextual information such as file structures and constraint cues, thereby developing a comprehensive understanding of the given task. In order to acquire up-to-date information, CuratorMAS retrieves domain knowledge from online sources to augment the evaluation process. Next, CuratorMAS derives the necessary evaluation criteria and computes the corresponding metrics. Based on these results, CuratorMAS executes filtering accordingly. Finally, an evolution module summarizes the evaluation outcomes and updates the relevant skills. Extensive and comprehensive experiments demonstrate that CuratorMAS significantly reduces the noise rate by up to 36.03 percentage points (pp) while also improving the F1 score of downstream models by up to 8.88 pp.

Explore similar work

Jun 2, 2026cs.AI

Can Generalist Agents Automate Data Curation?

Curating training data is among the most consequential yet labor-intensive parts of modern AI development: practitioners iteratively propose, implement, evaluate, and revise data policies against noisy benchmark feedback. We ask whether generalist coding agents can automate this data-curation loop. We introduce Curation-Bench, an agent-centric benchmark that fixes the model, training recipe, and evaluation suite while giving agents command-line access to inspect data, implement policies, submit them to a fixed training/evaluation pipeline, and revise. In a vision-language instruction-tuning instantiation, out-of-the-box agents reach strong published data-selection baselines within ten iterations. However, trajectory analysis reveals a persistent execution-research gap: agents mainly tune local policy variants rather than explore new policy families, even when given strategy guides and paper references. Scaffolds requiring each iteration to cite, instantiate, and adapt a prior method shift agents toward method-guided exploration. The scaffolded agent autonomously composes -- without human design input -- a data-selection policy that outperforms strong published baselines at one-tenth their data budget. Overall, current agents can run the curation loop, but reliable data research requires scaffolded method adaptation, not open-ended prompting alone. Code and benchmark are open-sourced.
Jul 7, 2026cs.CL

CurateEvo: Data-Curation Evolving for Agentic Post-Training

Large language model (LLM) agents require post-training methods that can improve long-horizon decision making from environment feedback. However, existing agentic post-training pipelines often treat data curation as a fixed preprocessing step, focusing mainly on data augmentation while neglecting filtering, refinement, and adaptation to downstream failures. We propose CurateEvo, a failure-driven dynamic evolution framework for agentic post-training data curation. CurateEvo represents the curation strategy as executable code and iteratively rewrites it using failed trajectories from a held-out development set. At each epoch, the evolved strategy transforms a fixed raw corpus into supervised fine-tuning data, reinforcement learning data, and an inference-time memory bank. The evolution process first improves effectiveness by diagnosing recurring failure modes and augmenting, filtering, or refining data accordingly, and then improves efficiency by pruning redundant or low-utility training turns under a cost-aware objective. Experiments on ACEBench-Agent, BFCL-V4, and τ^2-Bench under both labeled and wild-data settings show that CurateEvo consistently outperforms prior curation methods, improving average scores by 3.2 and 2.7 points, respectively. Further analyses demonstrate that CurateEvo is compatible with different post-training recipes and substantially reduces curation overhead.
Aug 11, 2026cs.AI

Agentic Instruction Data Selection: Let DataMaster Interpret Your Intent

Although existing instruction data selection methods have introduced various metrics, the inherent complexity of real-world datasets makes it impractical for any single metric to generalize across all scenarios. Developers are thus often forced to manually inspect data and craft heuristic rules for each new application---a tedious and error-prone process. In this paper, we propose a paradigm shift from manual configuration to automated orchestration via the Instruction Data Selection Agent (DataMaster), which interprets user intent and autonomously composes optimal selection strategies. By allowing users to specify data needs through natural language descriptions, DataMaster simplifies data curation and removes the burden of manual strategy design. Extensive experiments across the math, medical, and code domains show that DataMaster outperforms static baselines in most settings and surpasses full-pool training in a substantial number of cases. The implementation of DataMaster and the scripts needed to reproduce the reported pipeline are publicly available at https://github.com/nju-websoft/DataMaster.