AgentMemGate: Addressing Speculation Contamination in Conversational Assistant Memory

Personalized conversational AI relies on long-term memory systems that extract facts from user utterances and store them in persistent vector stores. Despite progress in retrieval, deduplication, and lifecycle management, the formation stage, the moment a fact is first written to storage has received almost no principled attention. We identify this as the binding constraint on memory quality in production systems. Critical contextual signals, such as the distinction between a permanent user attribute and a transient situation, exist only in the original utterance and are irreversibly lost the moment extraction produces a subject-relation-object triple. No downstream process can recover them. We propose Gated Memory, a lightweight, modular formation framework that interposes two decision checkpoints between conversation and storage: an admission gate that evaluates every candidate fact against the full utterance context before extraction runs, and a conditional enrichment stage that grounds admitted facts through an entity scope taxonomy with privacy constraints. The gate evaluates only the current exchange while using prior turns as read-only reference context, and produces a structured formation record. Admitted content is decomposed into atomic facts, each categorized, tagged with provenance (directly stated versus inferred), scoped to its condition of applicability, and grounded in resolved time and place, subject to a constraint that no entity absent from the context may be asserted. On the LoCoMo-10 benchmark with atypical emotional density in utterance data, Gated Memory achieves an overall +2.6% relative improvement in LLM-judge accuracy over a strong baseline with identical retrieval and generation, establishing formation quality as a measurable constraint on memory performance.

LLM agents that operate over many turns accumulate facts in an external memory store and reuse them as premises for downstream reasoning. A hallucinated fact written at one step therefore persists as a false premise for every subsequent step, a failure mode we call memory contamination. Existing memory management addresses retrieval and capacity but not write-time correctness; this admission problem cannot be solved by utility- or recency-based criteria, and uncontrolled contamination compounds across long trajectories. We propose ConsistencyGate, a write-time admission gate that, before committing a candidate fact m extracted from context c, queries the LLM K times for a soft support score and admits m only when the average exceeds a threshold. The mechanism is model-agnostic, requires no fine-tuning, and reduces to a single forward pass in a log-probability variant for latency-sensitive deployments. To measure the effect on natural data, we construct two real-conversation benchmarks (LoCoMo-Contam and MSC-Contam) by planting controlled single-detail corruptions in long-term conversations from LoCoMo and MSC, and complement them with a structured synthetic corpus (MemContam) that isolates a near-oracle upper bound. Across four LLM backbones, ConsistencyGate reduces contamination on every benchmark relative to a write-everything baseline, with the cost concentrated on facts that are stated only implicitly in the source context. We release all three benchmarks together with the gate implementation.

AI agents require memory that preserves information across user-agent exchanges, user-to-user conversations, and group conversations with or without agent participation, while supporting updates as evidence changes or is removed. We present Stashbird, an agent memory system that links source episodes to derived memory state through explicit provenance. Stashbird organizes memory into episodic records, semantic relations, community summaries, and persisted graph state, with lifecycle operations for incremental updates and episode-level deletion. We evaluate question-answering accuracy and model-facing workload across four long-term memory benchmarks. On LoCoMo, Stashbird uses 76.4x fewer ingestion prompt tokens than Graphiti. Compared with reproduced Hindsight on the same benchmark, it uses 8.1x fewer retrieval prompt tokens, with accuracy 1.6 percentage points lower. It achieves higher accuracy than Hindsight on LongMemEval-S and GroupMemBench and comparable accuracy on EverMemBench.