Adaptive Power Sampling for LLM Reasoning

Power-sharpened sampling is an inference-time alternative to reinforcement-learning (RL) post-training for enhancing reasoning in large language models (LLMs). High-probability sequences are amplified under the base model without parameter updates or external rewards, avoiding the costly optimization and jagged generalization of RL. However, this approach faces a fundamental exploration--exploitation trade-off, as % strong sharpening restricts exploration, trapping samplers in plausible but incorrect reasoning trajectories, whereas weak sharpening leaves the answer distribution diffuse. To resolve this trade-off, we introduce \textbf{Parallel Power Tempering (PPT)}, instantiating power-sharpened LLM sampling via parallel tempering. Running multiple \emph{interacting} replicas in parallel at different sharpening levels allows lower-power replicas to explore diverse reasoning trajectories and higher-power chains to further exploit higher-likelihood responses favored by the sharpened target. Specifically, we tailor \method{} to inference-time sampling by mitigating a truncation bias, identified in prior power samplers, and investigate effective swap strategies under finite memory and compute budgets. Extensive experimentation shows that \method{} substantially improves single-chain power-sharpened sampling and outperforms RL-post-trained models, producing higher-quality reasoning traces and even achieving performance comparable to frontier models.

Power Sampling sharpens a language model's distribution over complete generation trajectories, offering a verifier-free way to improve reasoning at inference time. It also has the potential to serve as a general-purpose front end for a broad range of downstream sampling methods. However, we uncover a striking paradox: Power Sampling can drive more probability mass toward correct trajectories while degrading the downstream inference it is intended to enhance. Using self-consistency as a representative case, we observe accuracy drops of up to 18.5 percentage points across models and reasoning benchmarks. We trace this paradox to two mismatches. Dose mismatch arises because a fixed exponent induces drastically different amounts of distributional change across problems. Coverage mismatch arises because global sharpening concentrates mass on a narrow set of dominant paths: high pass@k, often interpreted as evidence of preserved diversity, can therefore coexist with the loss of broad reasoning-path support required for downstream aggregation, search, and selection. Guided by this diagnosis, we replace uniform trajectory exponentiation with a deformation-controlled, support-preserving Power target that calibrates sharpening across problems while limiting the suppression of moderate-probability paths. In a same-budget instantiation with weighted self-consistency, the repaired sampler reverses the losses caused by global Power and outperforms standard multi-sample inference across reasoning benchmarks.

Sampling from the sequence-level power distribution $p^α$ elicits RL-level reasoning from base language models without any parameter updates, but the standard Metropolis--Hastings (MH), a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampler, is both expensive and slow-mixing. We trace both to a structural mismatch: $p^α$ mainly departs from $p$ at a sparse, spatially clustered set of high-entropy decision points, yet MH proposes resampling positions uniformly along the prefix -- wasting compute on near-degenerate conditionals while under-mixing precisely where modes diverge. We propose Entropy-Guided Power Sampling (EGPS), a training-free and verifier-free sampler that re-derives its proposal from token-level entropy already in the forward pass. EGPS skips deterministic blocks, localizes each MCMC move to a high-entropy neighborhood, and applies Multiple-Try Metropolis at decision points -- making sampling cost scale with \emph{entropy mass rather than sequence length}. On Qwen2.5-Math-7B, EGPS reaches best or tied-best accuracy on all three benchmarks (MATH500 $75.8\%$, HumanEval $62.2\%$, GPQA $42.4\%$) at up to a $12.6\times$ wall-clock speedup over the MH baseline.