Early Memory Selection for Balanced Adam

Recent evidence suggests that Adam performs robustly when its momentum parameters are tied, $β_1=β_2$, reducing the optimizer to a single remaining parameter. However, how this parameter should be set remains poorly understood. We argue that, in balanced Adam, $β$ should not be treated as a dimensionless constant: it defines a statistical memory horizon $H_β=(1-β)^{-1}$. In terms of the effective learning horizon $T_{\mathrm{ES}}$, estimated from the validation trajectory, we study the refresh count $R_β=(1-β)T_{\mathrm{ES}}$, which measures how many times Adam renews its internal statistics during the useful phase of training. Across 11 vision and language experiments, we find that choosing $β$ so that $R_β\approx1000$ selects different $β$ values depending on the training scale, yet improves robustness over the best fixed-beta baseline. Compared with the strongest fixed choice $β=0.944$, the refresh rule improves worst-case robustness, reducing the maximum relative gap in validation loss by 33.4%, while bringing all 11 runs within 1% of their validation oracle. These results suggest that the remaining hyperparameter of balanced Adam is more naturally viewed as a memory-scale variable than as a fixed constant. This provides a simple budget-aware perspective on optimizer scaling and opens a path toward treating Adam's momentum as part of the learning dynamics rather than as a static default.

Adam has been at the core of large-scale training for almost a decade, yet the role of its two momentum parameters remains poorly understood. Recent work shows that tying $β_{1}=β_{2}$ can preserve Adam's strong performance despite collapsing two memory scales into one, raising a basic question: what becomes dynamically special when the memories are tied? We identify a concrete mechanism. In the continuous-time limit, each normalized-update coordinate decomposes into a sign component, an explicit magnitude-lag term proportional to the difference between the two memory times, and additional transition, curvature, and nonlinear ratio terms. This lag channel vanishes exactly when $β_{1}=β_{2}$, making the diagonal the unique regime in which this mismatch-induced response is structurally absent. A full-history discrete decomposition on real training gradients recovers this change in composition: tied updates are sign-dominated, whereas the lag term becomes substantial off the diagonal and leaves a comparatively small residual. Across six vision and language tasks, tied configurations also typically exhibit smoother update-norm trajectories. Overall, our results identify memory-scale mismatch as a concrete source of magnitude sensitivity in Adam and provide a mechanistic account of why tied momentum is dynamically distinctive.

Adam and its variants dominate neural network training, but a single run only reveals whether a configuration works well after most of its budget is spent, a poor fit for hyperparameter or architecture search, where configurations must be ranked cheaply and pruned early. We introduce EvE (Evolutionary Explorer), a steady-state, population-of-four differential evolution (DE) optimizer with a targeted Adam fallback: each iteration proposes one candidate via DE, running a short burst of gradient descent only if the DE step fails to improve on the incumbent. Selection is greedy, so on a deterministic objective the best-so-far value is provably monotone non-increasing, and since gradients are used only as a targeted rescue, per-iteration cost stays within a constant factor of a single Adam step regardless of dimension. Under a fixed, evaluation-cost-matched budget, EvE wins or ties Adam on 76% of 70 (problem, dimension) cells across seven scalable benchmarks up to one million variables. On three real neural-network tasks (an MLP on MNIST, and LoRA fine-tuning of a 1.5B-parameter language model on two datasets) EvE finishes the same charged budget 1.7-3.9x faster, at a modest cost in final quality (about one accuracy point on MNIST, 9-11% higher relative test loss on the two fine-tuning tasks; on GSM8K, Adam is about 5 accuracy points more accurate, and fine-tuning lowers accuracy below the base model for both). Inside successive halving on UCI Adult, EvE completes hyperparameter and architecture searches 3.1-3.5x faster, ranking configurations about as consistently with Adam as Adam does with itself across seeds (Kendall's tau 0.66-0.69). EvE is not a total replacement for Adam as a final-stage trainer, but a fast, gradient-aware proxy for the search-heavy, budget-constrained regime one level up.