$Δ$Representation: Geometry Supervised Representation Learning of Phenotypes via Counterfactual Reasoning for Medical VLMs

Medical vision-language models (VLMs) have shown increasing potential for clinical image interpretation. However, these models still struggle to interpret multi-phenotype lesions whose diagnosis requires the joint assessment of multiple pathological phenotypes. Existing vision-language alignment methods produce visual representations that fail to preserve anatomical hierarchies and relationships among phenotypic subclasses. This stems from their reliance on semantic supervision, which lacks geometric constraints to preserve these relationships in the visual embedding space. Moreover, the sparsity of lesion-related anatomical and phenotypic representations makes it difficult for medical VLMs to capture important diagnostic evidence. To address these limitations, we propose \textbf{PureVision}, a geometry-supervised visual representation learning framework for multi-phenotype lesion interpretation in medical VLMs. It combines a geometry-supervised representation learning module, \textbf{PureEyes}, and an anatomy-guided evidence aggregation module, \textbf{PureNeurons}. PureEyes provides geometric supervision through ideal spatial distributions that encode anatomical hierarchies and phenotypic subclass relationships. PureNeurons projects visual representations into the learned latent space, using their positions to selectively aggregate lesion-specific anatomical and phenotypic evidence. Experiments on \textit{LIDC-IDRI}, \textit{CBIS-DDSM}, and \textit{3DReasonKnee} demonstrate that PureVision improves lesion grounding and phenotype characterization in visual question answering and radiology report generation. Code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/purevision-06C2.

Medical vision-language models (VLMs) have shown increasing potential for clinical image interpretation, including lesion detection and report generation. However, their practical utility remains limited by insufficient sensitivity to subtle lesions, whose visual evidence is often sparse, low-contrast, and embedded within complex anatomical context. As local visual tokens are aggregated, these weak lesion cues can become underrepresented in global image representations, making them difficult for medical VLMs to recognize. Existing efforts to improve lesion sensitivity mainly rely on medical-domain vision-encoder pre-training, clinical-term-guided alignment, or trainable pathological representation enhancement. Although effective, these approaches usually require additional training or model-specific adaptation and may overfit to particular disease morphologies, limiting their applicability to frozen medical VLMs. To address these limitations, we propose EasyLens, a training-free plug-and-play subtle-lesion representation amplifier for medical VLMs. EasyLens first constructs EasyBank, a pathology-anatomy prototype space that provides lesion-related prototypes and anatomy-aware normal references for comparing suspicious patches against both pathological and normal anatomical patterns. To avoid blindly amplifying normal tissues, EasyTag selects lesion-relevant patches through counterfactual prototype reasoning. To counteract the dilution of subtle lesion cues in global image representations, EasyAmplifier strengthens the selected lesion-relevant patch representations through morphology-guided residual enhancement, thereby increasing their contribution to the global image embedding. Experiments on multiple medical image datasets and frozen medical VLM backbones show that EasyLens improves subtle-lesion detection and outperforms existing encoder-enhancement baselines.

Large vision language models (VLMs) report strong accuracy on medical question-answering, yet it remains unclear whether they reason from visual evidence or exploit textual shortcuts. We introduce a counterfactual evaluation framework that decouples visual and textual contributions by substituting input images with controlled surrogates blank, pixel-shuffled, image-absent, and CLIP-retrieved hard negatives and derive a suite of grounding metrics including the Visual Reliance Score (VRS) and Visual Hallucination Rate (VHR). We further introduce CORAL (COntrastive Retrieval-Augmented Learning), a 7B-parameter LoRA fine-tune of Qwen2.5-VL-7B trained with a Contrastive Grounding Objective (CGO) that penalises answer invariance under hard-negative image swaps. On a paired controlled evaluation across four closed-form medical VQA benchmarks (PathVQA, PMC-VQA, SLAKE, VQA-RAD; n=400 total), CORAL improves macro accuracy by +6.7 pp (P(Delta>0)=0.988) and reduces VHR by 8.0 pp (P<0.001) over the matched Qwen2.5-VL-7B base; neither MedVLThinker RL variant achieves a significant gain on either metric. Cross-domain diagnostics further reveal that image substitution costs only <=6.5 pp on medical benchmarks versus 48-61 pp on general-domain tasks, situating the grounding gap that CGO targets. We discuss evaluation limitations openly including train/eval benchmark overlap and underpowered secondary metrics and release our framework, training code, and model weights to support reproducible grounding audits of medical VLMs.