Mitigating Capability Degradation in LLM Self-Improvement via Representation Geometry Regularization

On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) has emerged as a popular paradigm for large language model (LLM) self-improvement, allowing models to act as their own teachers by leveraging privileged information such as ground-truth solutions. However, recent findings indicate that OPSD can severely degrade the performance of LLMs on complex reasoning tasks: By forcing the student to imitate an artificially confident reasoning trace conditioned on privileged information, OPSD inadvertently suppresses expressions of uncertainty and penalizes the exploratory, self-corrective behaviors required to solve challenging problems. To address this, we introduce Negative Self-Distillation (NSD), a new framework that optimizes LLMs by diverging from flawed reasoning rather than imitating privileged solutions. Instead of relying on ground-truth answers or external supervision, NSD uses the model itself to generate a question-specific negative condition (eg, acting as a ``careless reasoner'') and pushes the student's distribution away from this self-generated negative teacher. Naively applying unlearning objectives to achieve this divergence is problematic, as flawed reasoning tokens are confounded with basic linguistic tokens; indiscriminately penalizing both risks catastrophically degrading the model's foundational language capabilities. We resolve this by designing a dynamic gating mechanism that automatically identifies and isolates reasoning-critical tokens, ensuring gradient updates target only behavioral flaws while preserving the model's linguistic priors. Empirically, NSD consistently outperforms OPSD and other label-free, self-bootstrapping reinforcement learning (RL) baselines.

Self-distillation bootstraps large language models (LLMs) by training on their own generations. However, existing methods either rely on external signals to curate self-generated outputs (e.g., correctness filtering, execution feedback, and reward search), which are costly and unavailable for the best-performing frontier models, or skip curation entirely and train on all raw outputs, an approach that is often domain-specific and hard to generalize. Both also share a deeper weakness that self-generated outputs entangle task-relevant capability with others, such as stylistic patterns, formatting artifacts, and model-specific errors, diluting the signal for the specific capability one aims to improve. In this paper, we propose Self-Policy Distillation (SPD), which achieves generalizable, capability selective with only minimal external signal (<5% labeled data in each domain). Specifically, SPD extracts a low-rank capability subspace from the model's own gradients on correctness-defining tokens, projects key-value (KV) activations into this subspace during self-generation, and fine-tunes on the resulting raw outputs with standard next-token prediction loss.Through extensive experiments across code generation, mathematical reasoning, and multiple-choice QA, we show that SPD achieves up to 13% improvement over state-of-the-art self-distillation methods and up to 16.3% improvement over pre-trained baselines. Notably,SPD demonstrates superior generalizability, achieving 15.7% better performance under out-of-domain generalization settings.

On-policy (Self-)Distillation (OPD / OPSD) has shown strong potential for post-training large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods still rely heavily on external supervision, including ground-truth signals, environmental feedback, or guidance from larger models, and therefore fall short of genuine "self"-distillation. In this study, we show that on-policy self-distillation can be achieved using only a model's own generations via internal consistency. We propose unsupervised on-policy self-distillation (U-OPSD). U-OPSD first samples multiple rollouts and constructs a pseudo solution by majority vote under a self-consistency threshold. It then conditions the model's distribution on the pseudo-solution and distills itself on the disagreeing completions, allowing the model to correct itself precisely where it is confidently wrong. Across diverse benchmarks, base models, and training settings, U-OPSD consistently improves over the base models and matches or surpasses supervised methods with ground truth (GT) such as OPSD and GRPO. On five mathematical reasoning benchmarks, i.e., AIME24, AIME25, HMMT25, MATH500, and AMC23, U-OPSD improves over the base model by 8.5% and 10.7% on Qwen3 non-thinking mode at 4B and 8B scales, and outperforms OPSD by 3.2% and 2.3% on average, respectively. In thinking mode, U-OPSD stays on par with OPSD, ahead by 0.9% at 4B and level at 8B and surpassing GRPO by 0.7% and 1.1%, respectively. Code is available at https://github.com/williamium3000/u-opsd.