Organizations: Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit complementary capabilities, yet selecting the most suitable expert for a given image-question query remains challenging due to heterogeneous multimodal inputs and varying expert strengths. Existing routing approaches rely on text-based cues or static model profiles, failing to capture fine-grained visual evidence and expert-specific failure patterns. To address this, we propose MHR-Router, a multimodal heterogeneous retrieval-enhanced adaptive routing framework for VLM inference. It accurately dispatches each multimodal query to the most suitable VLM expert via local retrieval evidence. MHR-Router consists of two stages: (1) Multimodal Routing Representation, which fuses frozen multimodal features into a comprehensive query representation; and (2) Heterogeneous Retrieval-Enhanced Adaptive Routing, which retrieves expert-specific success and failure memories as local evidence and employs a shared scorer to adaptively select the optimal expert. Experiments show that MHR-Router effectively achieves heterogeneous modality routing and consistently improves accuracy over traditional baselines.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Comparison between text-only LLM routing and multimodal VLM routing. (a) A text-only router selects an LLM expert primarily from prompt semantics. (b) A multimodal router selects a VLM expert by jointly considering visual evidence and question intent.
Figure 2: Overview of MHR-Router. (a) Frozen multimodal features form the routing representation. (b) Expert-specific success and failure memories provide local retrieval evidence for a shared scorer. The selected expert receives the original query.
Figure 3: Overall and ability-wise routing accuracy across input modalities and representation sources.
Method
Acc. (%)
Gain (pp)
Random Router
51.21
-13.00
Best Single (dev-selected)
64.21
+0.00
Per-ability Dev Selection †
67.70
+3.48
Per-task Dev Selection †
67.70
+3.48
Multimodal Query Router
70.36±0.38
+6.14
MHR-Router (Ours)
71.58±0.02
+7.36
Table 1: Main routing accuracy and gains over the development-selected Best Single baseline.
Ability
N
MHR-Router
Dev-best
Gain (pp)
Counting
480
96.88±0.00
96.88
+0.00
Defect anomaly
480
27.71±0.75
19.17
+8.54
Fine-grained recog.
480
72.43±0.43
50.83
+21.60
Object recog.
480
11.39±0.32
11.04
+0.35
OCR understanding
467
77.02±2.55
79.44
-2.43
Small-object detection
480
98.33±0.00
97.71
+0.62
Table 2: Ability-wise routing accuracy relative to the development-selected expert for each ability.
Figure 4: Parameter sensitivity analysis of MHR-Router.
Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin, China · Harbin Institute of Technology Shandong Key Laboratory of Digital Service Computing Technology and Systems Harbin, China