Revisiting Accent Classification with DistilHuBERT: Speaker-Disjoint Evaluation and Cross-Corpus Generalization
Authors: Xu He, Homayoon Beigi
Organizations: Department of Electrical Engineering Columbia University New York, NY, USA · Mechanical Engineering Dept. and Electrical Engineering Dept. Columbia University, NYC, NY, USA · Recognition Technologies, Inc. South Salem, NY, USA
Recent accent classification systems can achieve high accuracy in standard in-corpus evaluations. However, when speakers overlap between the training and test sets, such results may overestimate model robustness compared with real-world deployment scenarios. This study revisits the robustness of DistilHuBERT-based accent classification by using L2-ARCTIC and multiple external English accent datasets. The comparison covers file-level and speaker-disjoint splits, along with balanced external-data training and teacher-student pseudo-labeling. The large performance gap between in-corpus and external evaluations suggests that file-level evaluation substantially overestimates performance, while speaker-disjoint evaluation can provide a more realistic estimate of the generalization to unseen speakers. In this study, models trained on external data alone do not reliably generalize to L2-ARCTIC. Among the tested configurations, balanced external-data training offers the most promising supervised setting. The pseudo-labeling experiments further indicate that confidence-based filtering alone is insufficient under domain mismatch. Overall, this study suggests that robust accent classification evaluation should simultaneously include speaker-disjoint evaluation and cross-corpus testing.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the speaker-disjoint and cross-corpus evaluation framework. Solid arrows indicate supervised training and evaluation, while dashed arrows indicate the use of external data for balanced training, pseudo-labeling, and held-out external evaluation.
Setting
Speaker overlap
External use
Classes
File-level baseline
Yes
No
6
Speaker-disjoint baseline
No
No
6
Balanced external training
No
Yes
8
Semi-supervised training
No
Pseudo-labels
6/8
Second-level external test
N/A
Held out
8
Table 1: Evaluation and training protocols used in this study.
Model
Internal L2 Acc. (%)
External Acc. (%)
Baseline model
99.76
44.52
Table 2: Internal and external evaluation of the reproduced file-level baseline model.
Model
Labels
Training data
L2 Acc. (%)
Ext. Acc. (%)
Hugging Face baseline
6
L2-ARCTIC
91.65
58.96
File-level baseline
6
L2-ARCTIC
100.00
53.76
Speaker-disjoint baseline
6
L2-ARCTIC
81.40±3.62
61.27±15.49
L2 + external
6
L2-ARCTIC + external
81.09±4.10
100.00±0.00
External only
6
external only
16.35±0.00
100.00±0.00
L2 + external
expanded
L2-ARCTIC + external
83.01±2.80
98.55±1.00
Table 3: Round 1 evaluation results on official L2-ARCTIC and external comparable samples. Fold-based settings are reported as mean ± standard deviation across four folds.
Fold
L2-only (%)
Expanded L2+external (%)
0
86.80
87.10
1
80.15
82.50
2
79.25
80.95
3
79.40
81.50
Mean
81.40
83.01
Table 4: Fold-level official L2 accuracy for the two most relevant Round 1 supervised settings.
Model
Fold
L2 Acc. (%)
Ext. Acc. (%)
Comb. Acc. (%)
L2-Ext. Acc. (%)
Round 2 L2-only
0
86.20
71.05
85.13
42.00
Round 2 L2-only
1
74.60
47.37
72.68
–
Round 2 L2-only
2
80.10
63.16
78.90
–
Round 2 L2-only
3
80.30
67.11
79.37
–
Round 2 L2 + British/Singaporean
0
87.90
–
81.97
68.00
Round 2 L2 + British/Singaporean
1
76.20
–
70.82
–
Table 5: Round 2 evaluation results on L2-ARCTIC, external comparable samples, and the second-level external evaluation set. Dashes indicate settings where the external comparable accuracy is not directly comparable because the label space or test composition differs.
Accent classifiers are typically trained with a fixed label inventory and cannot accommodate new accent categories as new data becomes available. Moreover, accented speech corpora often exhibit substantial class imbalance and/or domain shift due to differences in recording conditions across corpora. We present AccentCL, a class-incremental learning framework for English accent classification that is robust to class imbalance and cross-corpus domain shift. AccentCL extracts multi-layer representations from a frozen Whisper-Large-v3 encoder, optimized with an imbalance-aware cross-entropy loss to reduce bias toward the majority accent classes and a domain mean alignment loss that minimizes distributional mean shift across training corpora. The label space is then expanded via replay-based continual learning, using the frozen base model for knowledge retention and an old-to-new margin loss to reduce overprediction on newly added classes. On a five-class accent classification task, AccentCL achieves 77.1% balanced accuracy and a 76.9% macro-averaged F1 score. We further evaluate the model's ability to incrementally incorporate two new accent categories: Spanish-accented and Chinese-accented English. When adding Spanish-accented English to the pretrained model, AccentCL attains an F1 of 83.3% on the new class while retaining 77.3% balanced accuracy on the base classes. When subsequently adding Chinese-accented English, it achieves 61.8% F1 on the new class while preserving 77.6% balanced accuracy on the previously learned classes. These results show that AccentCL enables robust regional accent classification while allowing new accent categories to be added without full retraining.
Mu-Ruei Tseng, Waris Quamer, Ghady Nasrallah +1
Department of Computer Science and Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77840, USA
ASR systems based on self-supervised acoustic pretraining and CTC fine-tuning achieve strong performance on native speech but remain sensitive to accent variability. We investigate supervised contrastive learning (SupCon) as a lightweight, accent-invariant auxiliary objective for CTC fine-tuning. An utterance-level contrastive loss regularizes encoder representations without architectural modification or explicit accent supervision. Experiments on the L2-ARCTIC benchmark show consistent WER reductions across multiple pretrained encoders, with up to 25 -- 29% relative reduction under unseen-accent evaluation. Analysis using within-transcript cosine dispersion indicates that SupCon promotes more compact and stable representation geometry under accent variability. Overall, SupCon provides an effective and model-agnostic regularization strategy for improving accent robustness.
Van-Phat Thai, Aradhya Dhruv, Duc-Thinh Pham +1
Air Traffic Management Research Institute, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore · Center of AI Research, VinUniversity, Vietnam
Representation learning has attracted great atten- tion and managed to reach good performances as a pretraining method for downstream tasks or as a first step towards unsu- pervised speech modeling. Yet, little is known about how such methods deal with out-of-domain speech and how could they be adapted in a few shot to new domains. This is important especially for accented speech where one observes a long tail of accents that diverge from the standard ones. We introduce ABX- Accent, a benchmark based on the AESRC dataset that features 10 different accents of English. It includes a small (< 10 hours) unlabelled training set in each of the accents and adaptations of the Zero Resources Challenge ABX evaluation metrics to each of the accents. We illustrate this benchmark with a baseline model that uses adaptive domain normalization to fine tune a pretrained Contrastive Predictive Coding model on the accents. This method is first developed on LibriSpeech using a male/female split. When applied to the new benchmark, the proposed method yields a relative improvement of 23.6% on across-speaker ABX scores on average compared to non adapted models. The data and metrics will be open sourced upon paper acceptance