Organizations: Department of Artificial Intelligence, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad · Centre for Responsible AI, Wadhwani School of Data Science & AI, Indian Institute of Technology Madras
Audio-visual dataset distillation aims to synthesize a small dataset from a large paired audio-visual dataset, while nearly preserving the training utility for neural networks. Existing approaches such as DM and AVDD face two critical limitations: 1) they are memory-intensive, making them difficult to scale to complex architectures and higher samples-per-class (SPC) settings, and 2) they often fail to preserve strong cross-modal semantic correspondence. To tackle these issues, we propose X-AVDD, a cross-attention-based distillation method that explicitly captures inter-modal relationships during synthesis. By decoupling cross-modal alignment from joint optimization, X-AVDD is substantially more memory-efficient, reducing end-to-end synthesis cost by ∼8× GPU-hours, while producing highly aligned synthetic data. Empirically, X-AVDD significantly outperforms other audio-visual distillation methods. On VGGSound, an audio-visual dataset of short YouTube clips, X-AVDD improves top-1 test accuracy from 8.2%→24.0% at SPC=10 and 9.8%→26.5% at SPC=20. Furthermore, X-AVDD improves cross-architecture generalization (e.g., 25.5%→35.3% for a ViT target on AVE dataset at SPC =50) and successfully scales to complex architectures such as AudioCLIP, achieving 62.3% accuracy using only 5.65% of the full dataset, against the full dataset accuracy of 72.4% while completing in 9× lower training time compared to the full dataset.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Accuracy on the VGGSound dataset under different samples-per-class settings. X-AVDD consistently outperforms DM and AVDD ( Kushwaha et al., 2024 ) .
Figure 2: Modality gap (class-wise ℓ2 distance between audio and visual class centers in the feature space) on the AVE dataset, and datasets distilled by AVDD and X-AVDD using AudioCLIP network. X-AVDD achieves a consistently lower modality gap.
Figure 3: Overview of the bi-directional cross-attention mechanism for Audio-Visual event recognition.
ConvNet
ResNet-18
ViT
Dataset
SPC
Ratio (%)
DM
AVDD
X-AVDD
SRe 2 L
X-AVDD
SRe 2 L
X-AVDD
VGGS-10K
1
0.11
36.5 ± 2.5
40.4 ± 1.8
37.6 ± 0.8
21.7 ± 0.6
30.0 ± 1.5
16.7 ± 0.9
20.2 ± 0.5
10
1.13
43.8 ± 1.7
55.0 ± 1.7
57.2 ± 0.9
46.9 ± 2.0
54.5 ± 0.7
25.4 ± 0.5
30.0 ± 0.7
20
2.26
49.0 ± 2.4
58.0 ± 1.7
62.7 ± 0.5
52.7 ± 0.5
61.5 ± 0.8
26.1 ± 1.8
35.9 ± 0.8
50
5.65
-
-
66.1 ± 0.3
60.4 ± 0.9
66.7 ± 0.9
30.2 ± 1.2
42.1 ± 1.2
Full
74.7
77.4
62.1
Table 1: Comparison of accuracy (%) on synthetic datasets for various architectures with the ensemble fusion method. For the ConvNet architecture, comparisons are carried out against DM and AVDD, while for ResNet-18 and ViT, comparisons are carried out against a multimodal implementation of SRe 2 L. SPC denotes samples per class. Bold indicates best performance within each architecture group. - indicates Out-of-Memory (OOM) errors.
VGGSound-10K
AVE
SPC
Ratio (%)
Accuracy (%)
Train time (Hrs.)
Ratio (%)
Accuracy (%)
Train time (Hrs.)
1
0.11
24.8 ± 0.6
0.28
0.1
44.0 ± 1.2
0.43
10
1.13
33.7 ± 0.3
0.56
1.0
74.5 ± 0.9
1.31
20
2.26
46.8 ± 0.9
1.16
2.0
76.8 ± 1.1
2.66
50
5.65
62.3 ± 0.8
2.74
5.0
81.3 ± 0.9
6.43
Full
100
72.4 ± 0.7
25.30
100
85.6 ± 1.1
72.12
Table 2: Test accuracy obtained by synthetic data generated by X-AVDD on VGGSound-10K and AVE datasets with AudioCLIP architecture. Ratio is the percentage of the condensed image as compared to the full dataset. With a fraction of the time taken to train the model on the full dataset, distilled images can achieve comparable generalization accuracy, underscoring the role of distillation for training audio-visual datasets with SOTA architectures.
VGGSound-10K
AVE
Music-21
Target
SPC
SRe 2 L
X-AVDD
SRe 2 L
X-AVDD
SRe 2 L
X-AVDD
VGG-11
1
14.6 ± 3.7
20.4 ± 2.3
6.2 ± 2.5
11.4 ± 0.7
18.2 ± 1.9
22.3 ± 1.2
10
34.8 ± 1.3
41.3 ± 2.2
21.8 ± 0.4
29.9 ± 0.7
39.7 ± 1.6
47.3 ± 2.6
20
44.0 ± 2.4
51.5 ± 0.8
29.1 ± 0.3
35.6 ± 0.6
42.8 ± 1.1
58.7 ± 1.9
50
53.2 ± 0.2
59.4 ± 0.2
35.0 ± 0.7
42.4 ± 0.3
48.5 ± 0.5
64.3 ± 1.1
ViT
1
13.9 ± 1.1
23.3 ± 0.9
12.6 ± 0.8
13.9 ± 0.1
10.0 ± 0.5
14.4 ± 1.8
Table 3: Comparative analysis of cross-architecture generalization performance of the distilled dataset generated using the ResNet-18 architecture for both audio and video modality. We experimented with two target architectures: VGG11 and ViT. For both, the synthetic dataset generated by X-AVDD achieves higher generalization accuracy than that generated by the SRe 2 L adaptation. Results are provided for the Ensemble fusion method.
ImageBind
AST + SigLIP2
SPC
AVDD
X-AVDD (C)
SRe 2 L
X-AVDD (R)
AVDD
X-AVDD (C)
SRe 2 L
X-AVDD (R)
1
20.1 ± 0.4
25.7 ± 0.8
25.2 ± 0.6
28.3 ± 0.4
23.1 ± 1.3
24.3 ± 0.3
18.1 ± 1.2
37.3 ± 0.5
10
26.4 ± 0.9
40.9 ± 0.6
40.1 ± 0.8
58.4 ± 0.5
36.1 ± 1.0
42.2 ± 0.7
49.8 ± 0.7
58.7 ± 0.9
20
33.2 ± 0.5
43.1 ± 0.4
43.7 ± 0.3
64.3 ± 0.5
37.7 ± 1.3
49.1 ± 1.6
51.2 ± 1.2
65.6 ± 0.6
50
-
48.3 ± 0.3
56.7 ± 0.6
67.1 ± 0.3
-
51.7 ± 1.1
56.5 ± 0.7
73.5 ± 0.3
Full
79.8
81.3
Table 4: Performance analysis of distilled dataset for transfer learning with frozen backbone of SOTA models. X-AVDD (C) and X-AVDD (R) denote the synthetic datasets generated by ConvNet and ResNet- 18 , respectively. With only 50 samples per class, synthetic data generated by the ResNet-18 architecture and X-AVDD achieves performance comparable to that of training on the full dataset.
Method
VGGSound-10K
AVE
MUSIC-21
VGGSound
AVDD
165
471
363
5342
X-AVDD
23
51
45
628
Table 5: GPU-Hour comparison between AVDD and our proposed method for various datasets.
Figure 4: Impact of α on test accuracy. The left panel shows results for the VGGSound- 10 K dataset and the ResNet-18 architecture, while the right panel shows results for AVE and ResNet-18.
Table 10Table 11
Appendix figures & tables8 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Symbol
Description
V
Original large-scale training dataset
S
Distilled synthetic dataset
τa
Tokenization operator for audio data
τv
Tokenization operator for image data
Ta
Audio → image branch of bi-directional cross-attention block
Tv
Image → audio branch of bi-directional cross-attention block
Appendix
Table 10: Notation
Dataset
Method
Vendi ↑
Similarity ↓
Coverage ↑
VGGSound-10k
SRe 2 L
1.26
0.89
0.05
X-AVDD
1.65
0.87
0.15
Music-21
SRe 2 L
2.13
0.81
0.03
X-AVDD
3.04
0.77
0.13
VGGSound
SRe 2 L
1.23
0.81
0.05
X-AVDD
1.71
0.77
0.11
Appendix
Table 11: Comparative analysis of diversity metrics. Synthetic data generated by X-AVDD performs better across all three diversity metrics as compared to the baseline multimodal adaptation of SRe 2 L.
Description
Value
GPU
32 GB Tesla V100
OS
Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Python
3.11.7
Pytorch
2.4.1
NumPy
1.24.3
Appendix
Table 12: Details of the computing infrastructure.
Table 15
AVDD
X-AVDD
Steps
Time
Steps
Time
Buffer creation
1 hr
teacher training & embedding storage
65 mins.
synthesis
9 hrs.
synthesis
12 mins.
Total
10 hrs.
Total
1.3 hrs.
Appendix
Table 15: Timing comparison of AVDD and our X-AVDD on VGGSound-10k dataset for synthesis of SPC= 20 . Kindly note that, while the synthesis stage in AVDD is a recurring process, in our proposed method, training the teacher network and storage of the embeddings are one-time requirements, and only the synthesis stage is the recurring step for generating synthetic samples across various SPC settings.
Figure 5: Comparison of modality gap observed in the real dataset, synthetic data generated by AVDD, and our proposed method. As shown, our proposed method achieves a lower modality gap consistently across all classes in the VGGSound-10K dataset.
Figure 6: Impact of temperature on test accuracy. Results are provided for VGGSound-10K with ResNet-18 for SPC= 10 and SPC= 20 . We can see that accuracy increases with temperature till it reaches a maximum and then decreases, signifying the importance of the temperature parameter during soft label generation.
Dataset
SPC= 1
SRe 2 L
X-AVDD
VGGSound-10K
1
20.8 ± 1.5
26.8 ± 0.7
10
47.2 ± 0.7
55.4 ± 0.7
20
49.6 ± 0.2
65.1 ± 0.2
50
64.4 ± 1.2
69.5 ± 0.3
AVE
1
18.0 ± 0.1
21.2 ± 0.4
10
41.5 ± 0.6
51.6 ± 0.4
Appendix
Table 16: Test set accuracy comparison for various datasets with ‘concat’ fusion method.
Recent audio-visual generation models can synthesize synchronized video and sound in a unified diffusion process, but their inference cost remains high because long video token sequences require repeated attention computation across denoising steps. A variety of acceleration techniques have been developed for video generation models, including low-bit quantization, attention sparsification, and feature caching. However, since these methods are originally designed for video generation, directly applying them to audio-visual models overlooks the interactions between the audio and video branches and may therefore disrupt audio-video synchronization. We present a synchronization-aware acceleration framework for efficient audio-visual generation. Our key observation is that bidirectional audio-video cross-attention reveals structured interactions between the two branches, with high responses often concentrated on a few sound-related visual and temporal regions. Guided by this interaction pattern, we introduce a protected sparse attention strategy that preserves high-fidelity computation for synchronization-critical tokens while sparsifying redundant attention interactions. By explicitly accounting for cross-modal dependence during acceleration, our method improves inference efficiency while keeping video quality, audio quality, and audio-video synchronization.
Shengchuan Gao, Teng Hu, Bohao Feng +4
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Alibaba Token Hub, Alibaba Group · Alibaba Cloud Computing
Diffusion-based audio-visual generation methods typically perform joint denoising of audio and video latents throughout the entire sampling trajectory, repeatedly executing modality-specific denoising branches and cross-modal attention at every timestep. However, we observe that such uniform joint computation is not always necessary. The key is a modality-asymmetric recoverability: audio-side drift introduced by mid-stage caching can be substantially reduced by only a few terminal joint denoising steps, whereas video-side degradation caused by caching leads to persistent loss of motion and temporal details. This asymmetry suggests that inference acceleration should selectively cache recoverable audio-side computation while preserving full video refinement. Motivated by this observation, we propose Convergence-Adaptive Audio-Visual Cache (CAVC), a training-free modality-asymmetric caching framework. CAVC adopts a sandwich-structured computation allocation: after detecting that audio denoiser outputs enter a cache-tolerant regime, it caches and reuses the audio denoiser output to bypass audio denoising and cross-modal attention in the middle stage, while the video branch continues independent spatio-temporal refinement; a few joint steps are then restored at the end to reduce accumulated cross-modal drift and improve synchronization. Experiments across multiple public benchmarks demonstrate that CAVC achieves 1.10--1.35x wall-clock acceleration, improves several visual dynamics and temporal statistics, and maintains competitive audio fidelity and audio-visual alignment.
Lifan Jiang, Yibo Zhao, Senlin cheng +6
State Key Lab of CAD&CG, Zhejiang University · Ant Group
Recent advances in multimodal learning have achieved remarkable success across diverse vision-language tasks. However, such progress heavily relies on large-scale image-text datasets, making training costly and inefficient. Prior efforts in dataset filtering and pruning attempt to mitigate this issue, but still require relatively large subsets to maintain performance and fail under very small subsets. Dataset distillation offers a promising alternative, yet existing multimodal dataset distillation methods require full-dataset training and joint optimization of image pixels and text features, making them architecture-dependent and limiting cross-architecture generalization. To overcome this, we propose a learning-free dataset distillation framework that eliminates the need for large-scale training and optimization while enhancing generalization across architectures. Our method uses CLIP to extract aligned image-text embeddings, obtains prototypes, and employs an unCLIP decoder to synthesize images, enabling efficient and scalable multimodal dataset distillation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms optimization-based dataset distillation and subset selection methods, achieving state-of-the-art cross-architecture generalization.
Junhyeok Choi, Sangwoo Mo, Minwoo Chae
Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology