Diversity-Aware Ensemble of Quantum-Classical Models via Combinatorial Fusion
Authors: Jingyan Xu, Yuanhong Wu, Samuel Yen-Chi Chen, Sean Patten, Christina Schweikert, D. Frank Hsu
Organizations: Laboratory of Informatics and Data Mining, Department of Computer and Information Science, Fordham University, New York, NY, USA · Wells Fargo, New York, NY, USA · Division of Computer Science, Mathematics and Science, St. John’s University, Queens, NY, USA
Variational quantum circuits (VQCs) are highly sensitive to circuit architecture, yet most quantum machine learning pipelines select a single best design and discard the remaining candidates. This paper addresses whether the structural diversity across quantum circuit search spaces can be used to produce stronger predictions through model fusion. We apply Combinatorial Fusion Analysis (CFA), a model fusion framework that selects and combines multiple scoring systems using rank-score function (RSF) and cognitive diversity (CD), to a pool of 29 architecturally diverse classical models and quantum circuits. Using a diversity-aware model selection method, we identify subsets of maximally diverse models and combine them with both score and rank combination. Experiments on four binary classification benchmarks covering different domains demonstrate that CFA-based hybrid classical-quantum fusion consistently outperform the best individual model on every dataset considered with improvements up to 6.03% in accuracy. When comparing with relevant literatures, the CFA framework further achieves superior performance across all four datasets.
Figures & tables
Dataset
#Obs.
#Feat.
Majority class ratio
Description
Heart disease
270
13
0.556
Heart-related clinical data; predict presence vs absence of heart disease.
Ionosphere
351
34
0.641
Radar returns; predict good vs bad ionospheric signals.
Pima Diabetes
768
8
0.651
Medical measurements; predict diabetes outcome (0/1).
Spambase
4601
57
0.606
Email contents; classify spam vs non-spam.
TABLE I : Summary of the four benchmark datasets used in our paper. The majority-class ratio is the proportion of samples in the most frequent class.
Fig. 1 : VQC architecture.
Fig. 2 : Representative circuit architectures on n=4 qubits, illustrating three design philosophies in the 8-circuit pool. (a) StrongEnt; (b) TTN; (c) IQP. The remaining five circuits (BasicEnt, TwoDesign, Random, QAOA, MPS) follow one of these three philosophies and are described in the text.
Fig. 3 : Workflow of combining quantum and classical models using CFA.
Fig. 5 : Diversity rank-score functions for the four datasets.
Fig. 4 : Relationship among score function sA , rank function rA , and rank-score function fA .
Fig. 6 : Rank-score function graphs on the test sets of the four datasets (quantum models are highlighted in maroon).
Datasets
Best single model
Best combined model
Model
Performance
Model
Comb. type
Performance
Improvement
Heart disease
TTN
AUC: 0.9106
AdaBoost+ TTN +
ASC/WSCP
AUC: 0.9444
3.38%
H_RY_cyc + QAOA
Ionosphere
GBM or
Acc: 0.9434
H_RZ_std +GBM+
WSCDS
Acc: 0.9811
3.77%
SVM_RBF
SVM_RBF+AdaBoost
Pima diabetes
Adaboost or
Acc: 0.7845
AdaBoost+ StrongEnt
ASC/WSCP
Acc: 0.8448
6.03%
TABLE II : Best single-model and best CFA-based combined-model results on four benchmark datasets. For each dataset, we report the strongest individual model and its performance, together with the best-performing combined model selected by the proposed CFA framework, the corresponding combination type, and the relative improvement over the best single model. Maroon text denotes quantum models.
Dataset
Category
Models
Heart disease
Quantum
TTN, QAOA, H_RY_cyc
Classical
AdaBoost, GBM
Ionosphere
Quantum
H_RZ_std
Classical
RF, GBM, SVM_RBF, AdaBoost
Pima diabetes
Quantum
StrongEnt, BasicEnt, H_RX_cyc
Classical
AdaBoost, SVM_RBF
TABLE III : List of selected models per dataset
Dataset
Paper
Year
Model
Performance
Heart disease
Qi et al. [ 66 ]
2021
Cost-sensitive ensemble (RF+LR+SVM+ELM+KNN, full features)
AUC: 0.8799
Mukherjee et al. [ 67 ]
2017
SVM
AUC: 0.8985
Heidari et al. [ 68 ]
2022
Hybrid quantum neural network and random forest (HQRF)
AUC: 0.9164
Our method (CFA)
2026
AdaBoost+ TTN + H_RY_cyc + QAOA
AUC: 0.9444
Ionosphere
Santucci [ 69 ]
2017
Quantum nearest mean classifier (QNMC)
Acc: 0.8350
Tychola et al. [ 70 ]
2023
Quantum SVM
Acc: 0.8400
TABLE IV : Benchmark comparison of the proposed method vs. recent reported results on four datasets. For each dataset, three studies are listed with publication year, model, and reported performance. The final row for each dataset shows the proposed classical-quantum combined model and its performance. Maroon text denotes quantum circuits from our framework.
Variational quantum circuits (VQCs) are a leading approach to quantum machine learning on near-term devices, yet it remains unclear which circuit architecture yields the best accuracy-parameter trade-off on classical tabular data. We present a systematic empirical comparison of four VQC families -- multi-layer fully-connected (FC-VQC), residual (ResNet-VQC), hybrid quantum-classical transformer (QT), and fully quantum transformer (FQT) -- across five regression and classification benchmarks. Our key findings are: \textbf{(i)}~FC-VQCs achieve 90-96% of the R2 of attention-based VQCs while using 40-50% fewer parameters, and consistently outperform equal-capacity MLPs (mean R2=0.829 vs.\ MLP720's 0.753 on Boston Housing, 3-seed average); \textbf{(ii)}FC-VQC's Type4 inter-block connectivity provides partial cross-token mixing that approximates the role of attention -- explicit quantum self-attention yields only marginal gains on most datasets while significantly increasing parameter count; \textbf{(iii)}expressibility saturates at circuit depth≈3, explaining why shallow VQCs already cover the Hilbert space effectively; \textbf{(iv)}~LayerNorm on the fully quantum transformer improves classification accuracy, suggesting normalization is important when all operations are quantum; \textbf{(v)}~in our noise study on Boston Housing, FQT degrades gracefully under depolarizing noise while QT collapses. All results are validated across three random seeds. These findings provide practical architectural guidance for deploying VQCs on near-term quantum hardware.
Chi-Sheng Chen, En-Jui Kuo
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA · Department of Electrophysics National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu, Taiwan
Quantum machine learning (QML) is increasingly recognized as one of the most promising near-term applications of quantum computing, viewed as a next-frontier candidate beyond purely classical approaches. Hybrid quantum-classical models operationalize this potential by embedding a parameterized quantum circuit within a model where all other components remain classical-a design already applied to chemistry simulation, financial modeling, and image classification. However, their deployment in privacy-sensitive, multi-party settings is constrained by the need to avoid centralizing raw data and by the requirement that modern quantum circuits remain parameter-efficient to stay trainable at scale. In this paper, we address these constraints by evaluating federated learning (FL) as a means of combining a hybrid quantum-classical active party with a classical passive party, using Sherpa.ai's Blind Vertical FL (SBVFL) protocol to avoid centralizing raw data, while drastically reducing communication. We construct the split multiplicative periodic parity (SMPP) benchmark, following common QML design practice. On this task, our simulations show that SBVFL raises accuracy from 0.7227 to 0.8757 compared to local training, closely approaching non-private centralized accuracy, and that the hybrid quantum-classical model achieves this with substantially fewer trainable parameters than the classical neural networks and random forest alternatives. These results show that FL enables high-performing, privacy-preserving quantum-classical collaboration without centralizing raw data.
Carlos Cano, Daniel M. Jimenez-Gutierrez, Diego Sal +4
Variational quantum circuits (VQCs) are parameterized quantum circuits optimized classically. We propose a hybrid variational quantum circuit (HVQC) extending VQCs with a classical affine post-measurement layer, enabling vector-valued regression without the linear overhead of independent scalar circuits. Theoretically, we show that elementary one-and two-qubit circuits can approximate quadratic functions and products via data re-uploading and entanglement, providing the foundations of the full architecture. Experimentally, on two synthetic image reconstruction datasets and the Friedman1 benchmark (40,568 test samples), our HVQC matches Gaussian Process Regression and outperforms XGBoost and Random Forest. An ablation study confirms that both quantum and classical components are essential, and results highlight the central role of the feature map in hybrid quantum-classical models.