YOUDrive: Driving Style as a Composable Direction for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Driving style refers to the behavioral preferences that drivers maintain during driving, shaped by their diverse experiences, habits, and needs, and is typically reflected in varying levels of aggressiveness. If humans choose to use autonomous driving systems, they would expect the driving style of the systems to closely resemble their own habit. However, this is challenging for current industrial autonomous driving systems. To address this, we developed a style controllable action generation method, STAGE, for driving tasks. Its training process is based on imitation learning, incorporating both style value and latent value action modality encoding. Preference learning is then used to identify the user's driving style as a continuous, monotonic style value. And to reduce the cost of human involvement in the preference training process, we also developed a set of rules to compare driving style in data pairs. Then, during inference, the user inputs the style value to control the generated action patterns, dynamically meeting the user's expectations. Using the STAGE method, we verified that the style-controlled action generation results in several typical road scenarios significantly align with human expectations. Furthermore, through comparisons between the STAGE method and various other approaches, we reveal the unique functionalities of STAGE, including its style controllability, style continuity, driving style alignment capability and driving safety. The code for this work is available at: https://github.com/CarlDegio/STAGE

Traditional end-to-end autonomous driving frameworks frequently suffer from the "style-averaging" dilemma when trained on high-variance human demonstrations, yielding homogenized, style-uncontrollable, and even kinematically unsafe policies. To overcome this limitation, we present D$^3$-MoE (Dual Disentangled Diffusion Mixture-of-Experts), which disentangles trajectory modeling along two complementary axes. On the behavioral axis, generation is decoupled from selection: a style-conditioned diffusion process synthesizes multi-style candidate trajectories in parallel within a single scene, allowing a downstream module to select the optimal trajectory based on user preference or an evaluation score. On the physical axis, decoupled longitudinal and lateral routers activate their respective experts during inference time, trained without manual labels using self-supervised targets from orthogonal ground-truth kinematics. These activated experts, architected as Diffusion Transformers (DiT) and equipped with style-conditioned AdaLN and asymmetric lateral-fusion cross-attention, independently predict their corresponding physical state before being reassembled into a unified, kinematically coherent trajectory. Extensive evaluations on the challenging NAVSIM benchmark demonstrate that D$^3$-MoE achieves state-of-the-art planning performance, reaching 88.2 PDMS and 84.3 EPDMS by default. Moreover, our Best-of-Three ensemble strategy effectively broadens the multi-modal solution space, raising performance to 91.3 PDMS and 87.5 EPDMS. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses jointly confirm the framework's advantages in planning quality and style controllability.

Vision Language Models (VLMs) bridge visual perception and linguistic reasoning. In Autonomous Driving (AD), this synergy has enabled Vision Language Action (VLA) models, which translate high-level multimodal understanding into driving behaviors, typically represented as future trajectories. However, existing VLA models mainly generate generic collision-free trajectories. Beyond collision avoidance, adapting to diverse driving styles (e.g., sporty, comfortable) is essential for personalized driving. Moreover, many methods treat trajectory generation as naive token prediction, which can produce kinematically infeasible actions. To address these limitations, we present StyleVLA, a physics-informed VLA framework for generating diverse and physically plausible driving behaviors. We introduce a hybrid loss that combines a kinematic consistency constraint with a continuous regression head to improve trajectory feasibility. To train StyleVLA, built on Qwen3-VL-4B, we construct a large-scale instruction dataset with over 1.2k scenarios, 76k Bird's Eye View (BEV) samples, and 42k First Person View (FPV) samples, with ground-truth trajectories for five driving styles and natural-language instructions. Experiments show that our 4B-parameter StyleVLA significantly outperforms proprietary models (e.g., Gemini-3-Pro) and state-of-the-art VLA models. Using a composite driving score measuring success rate, physical feasibility, and style adherence, StyleVLA achieves 0.55 on BEV and 0.51 on FPV, versus 0.32 and 0.35 for Gemini-3-Pro. These results show that a specialized, physics-informed, lightweight model can surpass closed-source models on domain-specific tasks.