Adaptive Look, Flexible Thought: Learning How and How Long to Think in Multimodal Reasoning
Authors: Quanlin Chen, Xiuwei Chen, Kun Xiang, Zehua Ma, Chunjin Ye, Boqiang Guo, Xianming Liu, Xiaodan Liang
Organizations: Sun Yat-sen University · Shenzhen Loop Area Institute · Beijing Zhongguancun Academy · Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd · Harbin Institute of Technology
The introduction of long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning and external tools has substantially improved the performance of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on general and reasoning tasks. However, existing fast-slow reasoning paradigms mainly regulate textual reasoning length, while visual computation introduced by external tools or visual tokens is often treated as an auxiliary component. This separation prevents MLLMs from jointly optimizing visual perception and textual reasoning. To address this issue, we propose L2T (adaptive Look, flexible Thought), a unified reasoning framework that jointly optimizes the form and depth of computation. L2T first discretizes tool-produced visual states into visual tokens, bringing visual perception and textual reasoning into a shared autoregressive space. Based on this unified representation, L2T introduces a modality-aware routing reward to select appropriate reasoning modes and a difficulty-aware fast-slow strategy to adapt reasoning depth according to task complexity. Experiments on general perception and reasoning-intensive tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of L2T. Compared with explicit tool-calling approaches, L2T maintains competitive performance while achieving 1.7--3.6 times higher throughput.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of modality-aware routing and difficulty-aware fast-slow optimization.
Figure 2: Throughput and generation length comparison.
Models
Visual-Centric Perception
Reasoning-Centric Understanding
V ∗
HR4K
HR8K
MME-Lite
MMMU-Pro
MMMU-Pro-V
MathVista
MMVet
AVG
Open-Source Models
Qwen2.5-VL-3B ( Qwen Team, 2025 )
74.9 †
66.1 †
63.5 †
42.4
31.6
28.5 †
62.3
61.8
53.9
Qwen2.5-VL-7B ( Qwen Team, 2025 )
76.4 †
68.4 †
64.6 †
44.9
38.3
35.6 †
68.2
67.1
57.9
Textual Reasoning Models
Vision-R1-7B ( Huang et al., 2026 )
80.6 †
75.6 †
70.5 †
51.5 †
38.5 †
35.3 †
72.1
76.4 †
62.6
Table 1: Performance comparison across perception and reasoningcentric multimodal benchmarks. The best result is shown in bold , and the second-best result is underlined . For benchmark results reported in prior papers, we directly cite the published numbers.For missing entries, we evaluate the corresponding models under the same environment and mark these results with † .
Category
standard (%)
w/o route reward (%)
w/o fast-slow
Ration of Visual Token
Visual-Centric
31.8
21.9 (-9.9)
–
Reasoning-Centric
11.56
11.03 (-0.53)
–
Average Length of CoT
Visual-Centric
206.8
292.6 (+85.8)
234.7 (+27.9)
Reasoning-Centric
416.2
547.0 (+130.8)
469.9 (+53.7)
Table 2: Ablation on Route Reward and Difficulty-aware fast-slow.
Components
Visual-Centric
Reasoning-Centric
Total Δ
w/o visual token
70.6
55.4
-1.7
w/o two-stage rl
69.3
56.1
-2.3
standard
71.2
56.5
–
Table 3: Ablation on visual token and two-stage rl.
Appendix figures & tables14 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Models
SeePhys
SeePhysPro
AVG
Vanilla
Vision-only
Level 2
Level 1
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
11.7
8.5
11.5
12.0
10.9
FAST-7B
13.4
10.1
11.5
13.0
12.0
PAPO-7B
11.6
9.7
9.0
12.0
10.6
Thyme-RL
10.7
7.6
11.0
11.5
10.2
Monet
11.1
5.8
15.0
12.5
11.1
Appendix
Table 4: Performance on SeePhys-family physics reasoning benchmarks.
Figure 3: Pareto analysis of our method and slow-thinking RLVR Baseline.
Figure 4: VQ-VT converts tool-produced intermediate visual states into discrete visual-token sequences, enabling visual and textual reasoning to share a unified autoregressive token space for adaptive reasoning depth.
Image condition
Similarity
Repeated original
90.2%
Same image, 2 × upscale
84.0%
stretch
83.0%
Horizontal flip
72.8%
Noise + small mask
69.6%
Paired HRBench8K image
67.6%
Appendix
Table 5: VQ code similarity to the original 4K image.
Components
Visual-Centric
Reasoning-Centric
Total Δ
w/o threshold
70.5
56.0
-1.2
standard
71.2
56.5
–
Appendix
Table 6: Ablation on thresholds.
Figure 5: Difficulty-dependent reasoning length and benchmark-level CoT statistics.
Category
standard (%)
overtraining (%)
Δ
Average Length of CoT
Visual-Centric
206.8
10
+196.8
Reasoning-Centric
416.2
10
+406.2
Accuracy
Visual-Centric
71.2
68.6
+2.6
Reasoning-Centric
56 .5
44.3
+12.2
Appendix
Table 7: Ablation on Route Reward
Outcome / failure mode
n
Mean
Median
Correct-all
4,573
277.3
214
Correct-Perception
2,370
200.6
198
Correct-Reasoning
2,203
359.9
260
Perception failure
1,758
241.9
216
Knowledge failure
517
430.0
281
Reasoning-process failure
724
505.8
304.5
Appendix
Table 8: Mean and median CoT length for each answer outcome and failure mode.
Figure 6: Successful case study of our method.
Figure 7: Successful case study of our method.
Figure 8: Failed case study of our method.
Figure 9: Case study on Collapsed CoT.
Figure 10: Pie chart of the datasets.
Figure 11: Remaining ratio of informative rollout groups after online filtering during RL training.
Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) requires both fine-grained visual perception and rigorous logical deduction. Explicit text-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is computationally expensive and prone to visual hallucinations, while existing latent reasoning methods typically require costly training. Furthermore, directly adapting training-free LLM reasoning mechanisms to the multimodal setting yields unstable performance. We identify that this failure stems from their reliance on token-level entropy, which fundamentally conflates perceptual ambiguity (e.g., unclear visual details) with logical uncertainty (e.g., complex reasoning steps). To overcome this bottleneck, we present a novel training-free inference strategy for MLLMs that explicitly decouples perception and reasoning. We propose a novel metric, the vision-to-text attention ratio, to dynamically gauge the model's cognitive focus. Guided by this metric, our proposed framework, Attention-Guided Switching (AGS), adaptively triggers latent reasoning for perceptual tokens to preserve high-fidelity visual information in the continuous space, while enforcing explicit text generation for logical tokens to maintain structural anchoring. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, significantly improving both accuracy and inference efficiency by reducing autoregressive steps and latency. Code is released at https://github.com/swordAndSnow/MM26-AGS.
Haoqian Kang, Liupeng Li, Kuofeng Gao +5
Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen Shenzhen, China · Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University Shenzhen, China · Peng Cheng Laboratory Shenzhen, China +1
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has enabled multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) to tackle complex visual reasoning tasks by generating explicit intermediate reasoning steps in natural language. However, this text-based reasoning paradigm is inherently slow at inference time with even thousands of tokens and fundamentally constrained by the expressiveness of natural language. In this paper, we propose CoLT, (Chain of Latent Thoughts), a novel framework that teaches multi-modal models to reason through a chain of latent thought representations instead of verbose text tokens, which can perform thinking with as few as 3 steps. Naively forcing the model to think with latent states easily produces meaningless semantics and makes training unstable. To effectively regulate the latent reasoning process, we introduce a lightweight external decoder that provides step-level supervision for each latent reasoning step in two complementary directions: a forward mode that decodes latent thoughts into the textual reasoning of the next step, and a backward mode that aligns decoder hidden states with the model's latent thoughts given preceding textual context. We further incorporate internal supervision that encourages coherent step-by-step latent transitions. The decoder and internal supervision are removed during inference to maintain high efficiency of latent reasoning. Extensive experiments on eight benchmarks demonstrate that CoLT not only outperforms existing latent reasoning methods such as CODI and SIM-CoT, but also surpasses latent visual reasoning approaches that rely on auxiliary images with costly annotation requirements. Compared to text CoT methods, CoLT can notably reduce the inference time by 10.1× and text decoding time by 22.6×. Code is released at https://github.com/hulianyuyy/CoLT.
Lianyu Hu, Shengqian Qin, Zeqin Liao +4
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore · Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China · NKIARI, Shenzhen Futian, China +2
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has proven effective for enhancing problem-solving in large language models. However, when applied to multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), existing CoT approaches suffer from a fundamental limitation: they perform reasoning entirely in text without accessing visual features during the reasoning process. After initial visual encoding, image information becomes inaccessible, forcing models to reason based solely on whatever was captured in the initial description, which forms a `vision-blind reasoning' paradigm that limits fine-grained visual extraction, error verification, and adaptive attention. We propose Text-Visual Interleaved Chain-of-Thought (TVI-CoT), a framework that enables explicit interleaving of textual reasoning and visual feature access through learnable control tokens <THINK>, <LOOK> and <ANSWER>. These tokens allow dynamic switching between reasoning and visual grounding, attending to relevant image regions conditioned on the evolving reasoning state. Experiments on eight benchmarks demonstrate state-of-the-art results among MLLM-based CoT methods and notable performance boost compared to the baseline: +6.1% on MMMU, +3.8% on MathVerse, +3.4% on MathVista, and +3.4% on ScienceQA. Code is available at https://github.com/hulianyuyy/TVI-CoT.
Lianyu Hu, Xiaoyu Ma, Zeqin Liao +1
College of Computing and Data Science of Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.