Learning, Compression, and Meta-Complexity

Compression schemes provide a general framework for deriving data-dependent risk bounds for learning algorithms. For learning rules based on preferent compression, existing results upper-bound the risk in terms of a sample-dependent complexity $\boldsymbol{k}$, defined as the cardinality of the compression augmented by the training examples on which the reconstructed hypothesis is inappropriate. These results, however, yield a margin of order $O(\sqrt{\ln N/N})$ above $\boldsymbol{k}/N$. In this paper, we establish that the logarithmic factor is not intrinsic. We prove that, for every fixed confidence level $1-δ$, the risk is bounded with probability at least $1-δ$ by $\frac{\boldsymbol{k}}{N} + O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\right),$ uniformly over all possible values of $\boldsymbol{k}$. Thus, risk estimates for learning algorithms based on preferent compression attain the same law-of-large-numbers rate as the empirical estimate of the probability of a fixed event. We also show that the leading term $\boldsymbol{k}/N$ is necessary and investigate its relation to the empirical risk. In particular, we identify regimes in which the empirical risk retains the $O(1/\sqrt{N})$ convergence rate, as well as regimes in which it converges more slowly or ceases to be consistent, while the complexity-based estimator preserves the $O(1/\sqrt{N})$ rate.

A central question in modern learning theory is what notion of compression, if any, explains why over-parameterized neural networks generalize. Existing answers measure complexity at different levels, ranging from weights to representations; however, estimating the associated quantities either requires held-out data in principle or relies on the challenging (ultra) high-dimensional mutual information estimation. To overcome these challenges, we approach the question through the minimum description length (MDL) principle, and specifically, we propose the prequential regret as a complementary signal that is computable from the training trajectory alone. We establish that, in the (nearly) interpolating regime, the expected prequential regret upper-bounds the description length of the trained parameter under the algorithm-induced distribution, and that this description length translates into a high-probability generalization bound in the PAC-MDL setting. Along the way, we show that the encoder-complexity correction recently added to the algorithm-level information bottleneck (IB) is upper-bounded by an MDL parameter description length, \new{bringing together} the two views of compression from MDL and IB. Empirically, the prequential regret tracks the generalization error on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, with Pearson correlations exceeding 0.9.

Any lossless compression algorithm (like gzip) may be converted into a machine learning method, via either Normalized Compression Distance or the Minimum Description Length principle. Any auto-regressive model may be converted into a lossless compression method via entropy coding. This seemingly circular dependence has unrealized potential in modern artificial intelligence and machine learning, and we survey and formalize the various strategies that have been used to leverage compression for machine learning. We introduce and empirically validate a design framework for compression-based ML, finding compression-based methods competitive with conventional baselines and decisively stronger on malware. We find that varying these design choices yields accuracy gains of up to 0.62.