Compute-optimal data scaling for neural surrogates via multi-fidelity training

Neural operators are widely used as surrogate solution maps for partial differential equations (PDEs), but full-size models can be costly to store, deploy, and evaluate in many-query scientific workflows. This work introduces Operator Boosting, a stagewise residual-learning framework for constructing compact neural-operator surrogates directly, rather than training a large model and compressing it afterward. Starting from the empirical mean predictor in normalized output coordinates, the method trains a sequence of tiny same-family neural operators on residual fields and incorporates each correction through validation-selected shrinkage. We instantiate the framework with Fourier neural operators (FNOs), DeepONets, and convolutional neural operators (CNOs), and compare boosted tiny stacks against full-size monolithic baselines across one-, two-, and three-dimensional PDE benchmarks from PDEBench, APEBench, and The Well. Across 30 dataset-architecture pairs, 21 show positive mean accuracy gains and 17 have positive confidence intervals, while all boosted stacks reduce trainable parameter count by approximately 72-95%. Best-model comparisons show empirical Pareto improvements on 7 of 10 completed PDE benchmarks, including two-dimensional Navier-Stokes, shallow-water dynamics, Darcy flow, one-dimensional transport and reaction systems, and three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes. These results show that Operator Boosting often improves the empirical accuracy-parameter Pareto frontier of neural PDE surrogates, while also exposing PDE- and architecture-dependent regimes where residual boosting fails to offset compression.

We consider the problem of constructing surrogate operators for parameter-to-solution maps arising from parametric partial differential equations, where repeated forward model evaluations are computationally expensive. We present a systematic empirical comparison of neural operator surrogates, including a reduced-basis neural operator trained with $L^2_μ$ and $H^1_μ$ objectives and the Fourier neural operator, against polynomial surrogate methods, specifically a reduced-basis sparse-grid surrogate and a reduced-basis tensor-train surrogate. All methods are evaluated on a linear parametric diffusion problem and a nonlinear parametric hyperelasticity problem, using input fields with algebraically decaying spectral coefficients at varying rates of decay $s$. To enable fair comparisons, we analyze ensembles of surrogate models generated by varying hyperparameters and compare the resulting Pareto frontiers of cost versus approximation accuracy, decomposing cost into contributions from data generation, setup, and evaluation. Our results show that no single method is universally superior. Polynomial surrogates achieve substantially better data efficiency for smooth input fields ($s \geq 2$), with convergence rates for the sparse-grid surrogate in agreement with theoretical predictions. For rough inputs ($s \leq 1$), the Fourier neural operator displays the fastest convergence rates. Derivative-informed training consistently improves data efficiency over standard $L^2_μ$ training, providing a competitive alternative for rough inputs in the low-data regime when Jacobian information is available at reasonable cost. These findings highlight the importance of matching the surrogate methodology to the regularity of the problem as well as accuracy demands and computational constraints of the application.

Neural PDE surrogates are trained on numerical solver outputs that contain both physical evolution and solver-specific discretization errors. Because surrogates are also evaluated against held-out trajectories from the same solver, standard benchmarks cannot distinguish fidelity to the exact evolution from imitation of the numerical scheme. We introduce an empirical Fourier-symbol diagnostic that probes a trained surrogate's linearized one-step operator with individual Fourier modes and compares it with both exact-evolution and training-scheme references. To address architectural spectral bias, we train identical networks on schemes with orthogonal dissipative and dispersive signatures and compare their learned operators. In linear advection, the learned surrogates reproduce the training schemes' amplitude and phase errors, with the twin-scheme difference reaching more than 99.8% of the analytically predicted full-imitation ceiling. The same behavior occurs for a non-local Fourier neural operator and at the operator level for nonlinear Burgers dynamics. These results show that agreement with solver-generated test data does not by itself establish fidelity to the exact evolution. Fourier-symbol measurements provide a direct diagnostic of numerical provenance.