cs.CLOct 13, 2026

When Does an ASR Error Matter? Task-Role Diagnostics for Tool-Using Voice Agents

Authors: Xiaolong Wang, Shijie Su, Naqi Xiong

Organizations: Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany

Abstract

In cascaded voice agents, ASR errors can have markedly different downstream consequences: a small transcription error may leave a tool call unchanged or alter its intent or arguments. Conventional word error rate (WER), however, does not capture these differences. We introduce SpeechEvalX, a paired diagnostic protocol that evaluates how task roles affected by ASR errors influence structured tool calls. Controlled edits are matched by source utterance, edit count, and operation, while task-role labels are compared with lexical severity, BERT cosine distance, Semantic-WER, and binary criticality. Across 594 source utterances, joint call accuracy falls from 82.3% with reference transcripts to 71.9-74.9% across three ASR front ends. Number and negation edits cause 21.9-25.7 percentage-point losses, versus 1.4-2.9 points for control edits. Detailed task-role labels improve source-grouped ROC-AUC from 0.73 to 0.78 over binary criticality, showing that downstream impact depends strongly on the task role affected.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Mar 26, 2026

Back to Basics: Revisiting ASR in the Age of Voice Agents

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems have achieved near-human accuracy on curated benchmarks, yet still fail in real-world voice agents under conditions that current evaluations do not systematically cover. Without diagnostic tools that isolate specific failure factors, practitioners cannot anticipate which conditions, in which languages, will cause what degree of degradation. We introduce WildASR, a multilingual (four-language) diagnostic benchmark sourced entirely from real human speech that factorizes ASR robustness along three axes: environmental degradation, demographic shift, and linguistic diversity. Evaluating seven widely used ASR systems, we find severe and uneven performance degradation, and model robustness does not transfer across languages or conditions. Critically, models often hallucinate plausible but unspoken content under partial or degraded inputs, creating concrete safety risks for downstream agent behavior. Our results demonstrate that targeted, factor-isolated evaluation is essential for understanding and improving ASR reliability in production systems. Besides the benchmark itself, we also present three analytical tools that practitioners can use to guide deployment decisions.
Sep 30, 2026

Talk2Agent: Benchmarking Voice Interfaces for Text Agents

Large language model (LLM) computer-use agents are typically evaluated with clean written instructions, despite speech being an increasingly popular interface for interacting with such systems. Speech input introduces an additional failure point: transcription errors can alter task-critical entities, constraints, or targets before the agent begins reasoning, while conventional ASR metrics do not directly measure whether the information required for successful execution has been preserved. We introduce Talk2Agent, a benchmark for evaluating how effectively voice interfaces convey human-spoken instructions to LLM-based computer-use agents. Talk2Agent builds human-spoken versions of tasks from WildClawBench and OSWorld and evaluates a range of voice interfaces, including dedicated ASR models, audio-capable LLMs, contextual biasing, and LLM-based ontology repair. Because repeatedly executing long-horizon computer-use tasks is costly and stochastic, we further propose an execution-free, task-conditioned evaluation framework that projects the original task grader onto prompt-addressable intentions and measures how much task-relevant information is retained after the voice interface. On WildClawBench, Talk2Agent's execution-free native projection provides a practical, execution-grounded measure of voice-interface quality, correlating with downstream task completion and improving Pearson correlation by 0.246 over WER/CER on 32 hours of real human speech.
May 17, 2026

Analyzing Error Propagation in Korean Spoken QA with ASR-LLM Cascades

We analyze how automatic speech recognition (ASR) errors propagate through ASR-LLM cascades in Korean spoken question answering (SQA), focusing on downstream semantic failures that conventional ASR metrics cannot fully capture. Our analysis shows that the relative downstream degradation caused by ASR errors is consistent across LLMs with different absolute performance, suggesting that cascade degradation largely tracks ASR-stage information loss. We further identify single-character Korean ASR errors as a Korean-specific loss channel, where even a minimal transcription difference can change the intended question and degrade downstream QA performance. Finally, an auxiliary comparison shows that a large audio language model outperforms an ASR-LLM cascade with an approximately matched language backbone in noisy Korean SQA, indicating the potential of direct audio input to mitigate transcript-induced information loss.